Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012

Open Access 01-03-2012

Evaluation of magnetic scope navigation in screening endoscopic examination of colorectal cancer

Authors: Miroslaw Szura, Krzysztof Bucki, Andrzej Matyja, Jan Kulig

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer is the most common cancer in Europe. Early diagnosis and treatment gives the patient a chance for complete recovery. Screening colonoscopies in the symptom-free patients are currently performed on a wide scale. The examinations are performed under local anesthesia which does not eliminate all discomfort and pain related to the examination. The aim of this study was to evaluate magnetic scope navigation in screening endoscopic examinations performed to detect early-stage colorectal cancer.

Methods

The study group consisted of 200 patients, aged 40–65 years, who were free from colon cancer symptoms. All patients underwent complete colonoscopy under local anesthesia. The equipment could be fitted with the scope that allows three-dimensional observation of instrument localization in the bowel. The examination was performed by three experienced endoscopists, each of whom performed over 5,000 colonoscopies. The patients were randomized to two groups: those whose equipment did not have 3D navigation (group I) and those whose equipment did have 3D navigation (group II). Each group consisted of 100 cases matched by gender, age, and BMI. The authors compared the duration of introducing instrument to cecum, the pulse rate before the examination and at the time the instrument reached the cecum, and subjective pain evaluation by the patient on the visual analog scale.

Results

Group I consisted of 54 women and 46 men with a mean age of 54.6 years and mean BMI of 27.8 kg/m2, and group II had 58 women and 42 men, mean age of 55.1 years and mean BMI of 26.4 kg/m2. The average time it took for the instrument to reach the cecum was 216s in group I and 181s in group II (P < 0.05). Pain measured on the 10-point VAS scale was 2.44 in group I and 1.85 in group II (P < 0.05). The results showed a significantly shorter time for the instrument to reach the cecum in group II and significantly lower pain intensity during the examination was reported by the group II patients. No significant differences were found in the pulse measurements between the groups (P = 0.5).

Conclusions

3D navigation during colonoscopy decreases the time for the instrument to reach the cecum and lowers pain intensity subjectively reported by the patients. The use of 3D and the possibility to observe instrument localization and maneuvers brings more comfort to the patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Niv Y, Hazazi R, Levi Z, Fraser G (2008) Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic people: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 53(12):3049–3054PubMedCrossRef Niv Y, Hazazi R, Levi Z, Fraser G (2008) Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic people: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 53(12):3049–3054PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sun L, Wu H, Guan YS (2008) Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging. World J Gastroenterol 14(6):853–863PubMedCrossRef Sun L, Wu H, Guan YS (2008) Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging. World J Gastroenterol 14(6):853–863PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Pachlewski J, Orlowska J, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2006) Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355(18):1863–1872PubMedCrossRef Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Pachlewski J, Orlowska J, Nowacki MP, Butruk E (2006) Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355(18):1863–1872PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M, Sakumoto K (2005) Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 48(6):1295–1300PubMedCrossRef Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M, Sakumoto K (2005) Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 48(6):1295–1300PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hsieh YH, Tseng KC, Chou AL (2010) Patient self-administered abdominal pressure to reduce loop formation during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 55(5):1429–1433PubMedCrossRef Hsieh YH, Tseng KC, Chou AL (2010) Patient self-administered abdominal pressure to reduce loop formation during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 55(5):1429–1433PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bladen JS, Anderson AP, Bell GD, Rameh B, Evans B, Heatley DJ (1993) Non-radiological technique for three-dimensional imaging of endoscopes. Lancet 341(8847):719–722PubMedCrossRef Bladen JS, Anderson AP, Bell GD, Rameh B, Evans B, Heatley DJ (1993) Non-radiological technique for three-dimensional imaging of endoscopes. Lancet 341(8847):719–722PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Saunders BP, Bell GD, Williams CB, Bladen JS, Anderson AP (1995) First clinical results with a real time, electronic imager as an aid to colonoscopy. Gut 36(6):913–917PubMedCrossRef Saunders BP, Bell GD, Williams CB, Bladen JS, Anderson AP (1995) First clinical results with a real time, electronic imager as an aid to colonoscopy. Gut 36(6):913–917PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Heigh RI, DiBaise JK, Prechel JA, Horn BJ, San Miguel S, Heigh EG, Leighton JA, Edgelow CJ, Fleischer DE (2009) Use of an electromagnetic colonoscope to assess maneuvers associated with cecal intubation. BMC Gastroenterol 9:24PubMedCrossRef Heigh RI, DiBaise JK, Prechel JA, Horn BJ, San Miguel S, Heigh EG, Leighton JA, Edgelow CJ, Fleischer DE (2009) Use of an electromagnetic colonoscope to assess maneuvers associated with cecal intubation. BMC Gastroenterol 9:24PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brown GJ, Saunders BP (2005) Advances in colonic imaging: technical improvements in colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17(8):785–792PubMedCrossRef Brown GJ, Saunders BP (2005) Advances in colonic imaging: technical improvements in colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17(8):785–792PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Syed G, Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC, Williams CB (2000) Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 52(1):1–8CrossRef Syed G, Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC, Williams CB (2000) Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 52(1):1–8CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bell GD, Rowland RS, Rutter M, Abu-Sada M, Dogramadzi S, Allen C (1999) Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: assessing the routine use of a stiffening sigmoid overtube to speed up the procedure. Med Biol Eng Comput 37(5):605–611PubMedCrossRef Bell GD, Rowland RS, Rutter M, Abu-Sada M, Dogramadzi S, Allen C (1999) Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: assessing the routine use of a stiffening sigmoid overtube to speed up the procedure. Med Biol Eng Comput 37(5):605–611PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Williams CB, Saunders BP (2002) Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy 34(6):435–440PubMedCrossRef Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Williams CB, Saunders BP (2002) Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy 34(6):435–440PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ambardar S, Arnell TD, Whelan RL, Nihalani A, Forde KA (2005) A preliminary prospective study of the usefulness of a magnetic endoscope locating device during colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 19(7):897–901PubMedCrossRef Ambardar S, Arnell TD, Whelan RL, Nihalani A, Forde KA (2005) A preliminary prospective study of the usefulness of a magnetic endoscope locating device during colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 19(7):897–901PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kaminski MF, Regula J (2007) Colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy—current issues. Digestion 76(1):20–25PubMedCrossRef Kaminski MF, Regula J (2007) Colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy—current issues. Digestion 76(1):20–25PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Dahler S, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Seip B, Moritz V (2007) Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2(7):885–889CrossRef Hoff G, Bretthauer M, Dahler S, Huppertz-Hauss G, Sauar J, Paulsen J, Seip B, Moritz V (2007) Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2(7):885–889CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jess P, Bulut O, Almasi A, Waaddegaard P (2009) The usefulness of a magnetic endoscope locating device in colonoscopy in daily practice: a prospective case-controlled study. Surg Endosc 23(6):1353–1355PubMedCrossRef Jess P, Bulut O, Almasi A, Waaddegaard P (2009) The usefulness of a magnetic endoscope locating device in colonoscopy in daily practice: a prospective case-controlled study. Surg Endosc 23(6):1353–1355PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Franciosi JP, Mascarenhas M, Semeao E, Flick J, Kelly J, Mamula P (2009) Randomised controlled trial of paediatric magnetic positioning device assisted colonoscopy: a pilot and feasibility study. Dig Liver Dis 41(2):123–126PubMedCrossRef Franciosi JP, Mascarenhas M, Semeao E, Flick J, Kelly J, Mamula P (2009) Randomised controlled trial of paediatric magnetic positioning device assisted colonoscopy: a pilot and feasibility study. Dig Liver Dis 41(2):123–126PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of magnetic scope navigation in screening endoscopic examination of colorectal cancer
Authors
Miroslaw Szura
Krzysztof Bucki
Andrzej Matyja
Jan Kulig
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1930-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012 Go to the issue