Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2011

01-08-2011

How reliable is laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for octogenarians?

Authors: Rodrigo A. Pinto, Dan Ruiz, Yair Edden, Eric G. Weiss, Juan J. Nogueras, Steven D. Wexner

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Due to the current increased longevity in the elderly population and the increased size of that population, major abdominal intervention is more frequently performed among octogenarians. This study aimed to compare the surgical and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resections with those of open surgery in the octogenarian population.

Methods

Retrospective analysis based on a prospectively maintained database of octogenarians who underwent laparoscopic or open elective colorectal resections from 2001 to 2008 was performed. Diagnosis, comorbidities, operative data, and early postoperative complications are analyzed in this report.

Results

Colon resection was performed for 199 octogenarians, using laparotomy for 116 patients (group 1) and laparoscopic surgery for 83 patients (group 2). The mean age was 84.3 years for the laparotomy patients and 84.7 years for the laparoscopic patients. The American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores was comparable between groups 1 and 2. Colorectal adenoma was the most common indication for surgery in both groups: for 77.6% of the group 1 patients and 54.2% of the group 2 patients. Right colectomy was the most frequently performed operation in group 2: for 57.8% of the group 2 patients and 31% of the group 1 patients (p = 0.0003). Open resections had a higher mean blood loss in both group 1 (286 ml) and group 2 (152 ml) (p = 0.0002), and more patients required intraoperative transfusions (p = 0.005) despite similar operative times. The conversion rate in the laparoscopic group was 25.3%. The patients in the laparoscopic group had less morbidity, both overall and clinically, than the open group (p < 0.05). The median hospital stay was 8 days in group 1 and 6 days in group 2 (p = 0.0065). The rate of major surgical complications was similar in the two groups of patients: 6% in group 1 and 4.8% in group 2. The reoperation rate was 2.6% in group 1 and 3.6% in group 2 (p > 0.05). The mortality rate was 3.4% in group 1 and 2.4% in group 2.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic colorectal resection was effective and safe for octogenarians, with less blood loss and faster postoperative recovery. The morbidity rate is lower than for traditional laparotomy.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL (2005) Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 85:1–18PubMedCrossRef Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL (2005) Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 85:1–18PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332PubMedCrossRef Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PH (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195:768–773PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PH (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195:768–773PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075PubMedCrossRef Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929PubMedCrossRef Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941PubMedCrossRef Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938–941PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Feng B, Zheng MH, Mao ZH, Li JW, Lu AG, Wang ML, Hu WG, Dong F, Hu YY, Zang L, Li HW (2006) Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:191–195PubMed Feng B, Zheng MH, Mao ZH, Li JW, Lu AG, Wang ML, Hu WG, Dong F, Hu YY, Zang L, Li HW (2006) Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:191–195PubMed
11.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138:252–256PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138:252–256PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Frasson M, Braga M, Vignalli A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300PubMedCrossRef Frasson M, Braga M, Vignalli A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fielding LP, Philips RK, Hittinger R (1989) Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients. Lancet 1:595–597PubMedCrossRef Fielding LP, Philips RK, Hittinger R (1989) Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients. Lancet 1:595–597PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Payne JE, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT (1986) Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum 29:733–737PubMedCrossRef Payne JE, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT (1986) Surgery for large bowel cancer in people aged 75 years and older. Dis Colon Rectum 29:733–737PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cheung HYS, Cung CC, Fung JTK, Wong JCH, Yau KKK, Li MKW (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910PubMedCrossRef Cheung HYS, Cung CC, Fung JTK, Wong JCH, Yau KKK, Li MKW (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildirim C, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in old patients: do indications and outcomes differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332PubMedCrossRef Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildirim C, Lippert H, Köckerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in old patients: do indications and outcomes differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Person B, Cera SM, Sands DR, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2007) Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 22:401–405PubMedCrossRef Person B, Cera SM, Sands DR, Weiss EG, Vernava AM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2007) Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 22:401–405PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference De Santis L, Frigo F (2006) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Bio-Medica de I Ateneo Parmense 76:24–26 De Santis L, Frigo F (2006) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Bio-Medica de I Ateneo Parmense 76:24–26
19.
go back to reference Shawki S, Bashankaev B, Denoya P, Seo C, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2009) What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 23:2321–2326PubMedCrossRef Shawki S, Bashankaev B, Denoya P, Seo C, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (2009) What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 23:2321–2326PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
How reliable is laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for octogenarians?
Authors
Rodrigo A. Pinto
Dan Ruiz
Yair Edden
Eric G. Weiss
Juan J. Nogueras
Steven D. Wexner
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1631-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2011 Go to the issue