Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2011

01-05-2011

Advantages of the hand-assisted versus the open approach to elective colectomies

Authors: Sean B. Orenstein, Heidi L. Elliott, Louis A. Reines, Yuri W. Novitsky

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy has been introduced as an alternative to standard laparoscopy. However, to date, it has not been established whether intraabdominal placement of a hand abrogates the benefits of minimally invasive techniques. The authors hypothesized that the hand-assisted approach confers advantages of minimal access surgery over traditional open colectomy.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing elective open (OC) and hand-assisted (HALC) colon resections were retrospectively reviewed. Open colectomies performed by the laparoscopic surgeons were excluded. Outcome measures included patient demographics, operative time, perioperative complications, operative and total hospital charges, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed with a p value less than 0.05 considered significant.

Results

The study identified and reviewed 323 consecutive elective OCs and 66 consecutive elective HALCs. Of these, 228 OCs (70.6%) and 52 HALCs (78.8%) were left-sided. The two groups were similar in age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The mean operative time was longer in the HALC group (202 vs 160 min; p < 0.05). No major intraoperative complications occurred in either group, and no conversions from HALC to OC were performed. Postoperatively, 14 OC patients (3.8%) required blood transfusion versus no HALC patients. The rate of wound infections also was higher in the OC group (3.4%, n = 11) than in the HALC group (1.5%, n = 1) (p = 0.04). All seven mortalities (2.3%) occurred in the OC group. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the HALC group (5.3 vs 8.4 days; p < 0.001). The total hospital charges were significantly lower in the HALC group ($24,132 vs $33,150; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is a safe alternative to traditional open colonic resection. In this series, it was associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Despite longer operative times, the use of the hand-assisted techniques significantly reduced the hospital stay and decreased the total hospital charges. Overall, in the elective setting, hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy appears to be advantageous over the traditional open colectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kelly JJ, Kercher KW, Gallagher KA, Litwin DE, Arous EJ (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass versus open bypass for occlusive disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:339–343PubMedCrossRef Kelly JJ, Kercher KW, Gallagher KA, Litwin DE, Arous EJ (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass versus open bypass for occlusive disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:339–343PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, Rosa MI, Stein AT (2009) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004751 Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, Rosa MI, Stein AT (2009) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD004751
3.
go back to reference Schietroma M, Carlei F, Franchi L, Mazzotta C, Sozio A, Lygidakis NJ, Amicucci G (2004) A comparison of serum interleukin-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1595–1599PubMed Schietroma M, Carlei F, Franchi L, Mazzotta C, Sozio A, Lygidakis NJ, Amicucci G (2004) A comparison of serum interleukin-6 concentrations in patients treated by cholecystectomy via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1595–1599PubMed
4.
go back to reference Alpay Z, Saed GM, Diamond MP (2008) Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod Med 26:313–321PubMedCrossRef Alpay Z, Saed GM, Diamond MP (2008) Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod Med 26:313–321PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lamvu G, Zolnoun D, Boggess J, Steege JF (2004) Obesity: physiologic changes and challenges during laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:669–674PubMedCrossRef Lamvu G, Zolnoun D, Boggess J, Steege JF (2004) Obesity: physiologic changes and challenges during laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:669–674PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Young-Fadok TM, HallLong K, McConnell EJ, Gomez Rey G, Cabanela RL (2001) Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 15:450–454PubMedCrossRef Young-Fadok TM, HallLong K, McConnell EJ, Gomez Rey G, Cabanela RL (2001) Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn’s disease: improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 15:450–454PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 249:596–601PubMedCrossRef Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 249:596–601PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Stulberg JJ, Byrnes J, Delaney CP (2009) A national comparison of laparoscopic vs open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data. Dis Colon Rectum 52:183–186PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Stulberg JJ, Byrnes J, Delaney CP (2009) A national comparison of laparoscopic vs open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data. Dis Colon Rectum 52:183–186PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shabbir A, Roslani AC, Wong KS, Tsang CB, Wong HB, Cheong WK (2009) Is laparoscopic colectomy as cost beneficial as open colectomy? ANZ J Surg 79:265–270PubMedCrossRef Shabbir A, Roslani AC, Wong KS, Tsang CB, Wong HB, Cheong WK (2009) Is laparoscopic colectomy as cost beneficial as open colectomy? ANZ J Surg 79:265–270PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kusminsky RE, Boland JP, Tiley EH, Deluca JA (1995) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:463–467PubMed Kusminsky RE, Boland JP, Tiley EH, Deluca JA (1995) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:463–467PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ballaux KE, Himpens JM, Leman G, Van den Bossche MR (1997) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for hydatid cyst. Surg Endosc 11:942–943PubMedCrossRef Ballaux KE, Himpens JM, Leman G, Van den Bossche MR (1997) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for hydatid cyst. Surg Endosc 11:942–943PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Litwin DE, Novitsky Y, Kercher KW, Sandor A, Yood SM, Kelly JJ, Meyers WC, Gallagher KA (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Technol Int IX:43–46PubMed Litwin DE, Novitsky Y, Kercher KW, Sandor A, Yood SM, Kelly JJ, Meyers WC, Gallagher KA (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Technol Int IX:43–46PubMed
13.
go back to reference Study Group HALS (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 14:896–901CrossRef Study Group HALS (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 14:896–901CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Targarona EM, Gracia E, Rodriguez M, Cerdan G, Balague C, Garriga J, Trias M (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 138:133–141 discussion 141PubMedCrossRef Targarona EM, Gracia E, Rodriguez M, Cerdan G, Balague C, Garriga J, Trias M (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 138:133–141 discussion 141PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, Foglia C, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2004) Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique. Surg Endosc 18:582–586PubMedCrossRef Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, Foglia C, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2004) Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique. Surg Endosc 18:582–586PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Anderson J, Luchtefeld M, Dujovny N, Hoedema R, Kim D, Butcher J (2007) A comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assist and open sigmoid resection in the treatment of diverticular disease. Am J Surg 193:400–403 (discussion 403)PubMedCrossRef Anderson J, Luchtefeld M, Dujovny N, Hoedema R, Kim D, Butcher J (2007) A comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assist and open sigmoid resection in the treatment of diverticular disease. Am J Surg 193:400–403 (discussion 403)PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ, van Bodegraven AA, Bemelman WA (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240:984–991 (discussion 991–982)PubMedCrossRef Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ, van Bodegraven AA, Bemelman WA (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240:984–991 (discussion 991–982)PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhang LY (2006) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs open total colectomy in treating slow transit constipation. Tech Coloproctol 10:152–153PubMed Zhang LY (2006) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs open total colectomy in treating slow transit constipation. Tech Coloproctol 10:152–153PubMed
19.
go back to reference Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, Tang WL, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Li MK (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733PubMedCrossRef Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, Tang WL, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Li MK (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Aalbers AG, Doeksen A, VANBH MI, Bemelman WA (2009) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 12:287–295PubMedCrossRef Aalbers AG, Doeksen A, VANBH MI, Bemelman WA (2009) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 12:287–295PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, Yeh CC, Hsiao CW, Lee TY, Jao SW (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18:577–581PubMedCrossRef Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, Yeh CC, Hsiao CW, Lee TY, Jao SW (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18:577–581PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kurian MS, Patterson E, Andrei VE, Edye MB (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an emerging technique. Surg Endosc 15:1277–1281PubMedCrossRef Kurian MS, Patterson E, Andrei VE, Edye MB (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an emerging technique. Surg Endosc 15:1277–1281PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Meijer DW, Bannenberg JJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 14:891–895PubMedCrossRef Meijer DW, Bannenberg JJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 14:891–895PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Noblett SE, Horgan AF (2007) A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 21:404–408PubMedCrossRef Noblett SE, Horgan AF (2007) A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 21:404–408PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Advantages of the hand-assisted versus the open approach to elective colectomies
Authors
Sean B. Orenstein
Heidi L. Elliott
Louis A. Reines
Yuri W. Novitsky
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1368-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2011 Go to the issue