Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011

01-04-2011

Validation of a novel laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator

Authors: Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, James D. Adair, Tansel Halic, Mark A. Gromski, Zhonghua Lu, Woojin Ahn, Daniel B. Jones, Suvranu De

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Morbid obesity accounts for more than 90,000 deaths per year in the United States. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is the second most common weight loss procedure performed in the US and the most common in Europe and Australia. Simulation in surgical training is a rapidly advancing field that has been adopted by many to prepare surgeons for surgical techniques and procedures. The aim of our study was to determine face, construct, and content validity for a novel virtual reality laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator.

Methods

Twenty-eight subjects were categorized into two groups (expert and novice), determined by their skill level in laparoscopic surgery. Experts consisted of subjects who had at least 4 years of laparoscopic training and operative experience. Novices consisted of subjects with medical training but with less than 4 years of laparoscopic training. The subjects used the virtual reality laparoscopic adjustable band surgery simulator. They were automatically scored according to various tasks. The subjects then completed a questionnaire to evaluate face and content validity.

Results

On a 5-point Likert scale (1 = lowest score, 5 = highest score), the mean score for visual realism was 4.00 ± 0.67 and the mean score for realism of the interface and tool movements was 4.07 ± 0.77 (face validity). There were significant differences in the performances of the two subject groups (expert and novice) based on total scores (p < 0.001) (construct validity). Mean score for utility of the simulator, as addressed by the expert group, was 4.50 ± 0.71 (content validity).

Conclusion

We created a virtual reality laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator. Our initial results demonstrate excellent face, construct, and content validity findings. To our knowledge, this is the first virtual reality simulator with haptic feedback for training residents and surgeons in the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ritter E, McClusky D, Lederman A, Gallagher A, Smith C (2003) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 7(7):871–878PubMedCrossRef Ritter E, McClusky D, Lederman A, Gallagher A, Smith C (2003) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 7(7):871–878PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference van Dongen K, Tournoij E, van der Zee D, Schijven M, Broeders I (2007) Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21(8):1413–1417PubMedCrossRef van Dongen K, Tournoij E, van der Zee D, Schijven M, Broeders I (2007) Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts? Surg Endosc 21(8):1413–1417PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maciel A, Halic T, Lu Z, Nedel LP, De S (2009) Using the PhysX engine for physics-based virtual surgery with force feedback. Int J Med Robot 5(3):341–353PubMed Maciel A, Halic T, Lu Z, Nedel LP, De S (2009) Using the PhysX engine for physics-based virtual surgery with force feedback. Int J Med Robot 5(3):341–353PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ren CJ, Fielding GA (2003) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: surgical technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(4):257–263PubMedCrossRef Ren CJ, Fielding GA (2003) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: surgical technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(4):257–263PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fielding G, Duncombe J (2005) Clinical and radiological follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands, 1998 and 2000: a comparison of two techniques. Obes Surg 15(5):634–640PubMedCrossRef Fielding G, Duncombe J (2005) Clinical and radiological follow-up of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands, 1998 and 2000: a comparison of two techniques. Obes Surg 15(5):634–640PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A (2007) G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191PubMedCrossRef Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A (2007) G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(140):1–55 Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(140):1–55
9.
go back to reference Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482–487PubMedCrossRef Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175:482–487PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validation of a novel laparoscopic adjustable gastric band simulator
Authors
Ganesh Sankaranarayanan
James D. Adair
Tansel Halic
Mark A. Gromski
Zhonghua Lu
Woojin Ahn
Daniel B. Jones
Suvranu De
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1306-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011 Go to the issue