Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2010

01-09-2010

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases

Authors: Chris Edwards, Alan Bradshaw, Paul Ahearne, Pierre Dematos, Ted Humble, Randy Johnson, David Mauterer, Peeter Soosaar

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and objective

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new advance wherein laparoscopic surgery is carried out through a single small incision hidden in the umbilicus. Advantages of this technique over standard laparoscopy are still under investigation. The objective of this study is to describe the short-term outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in a single community-based institution.

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database for all patients who underwent SILS cholecystectomy was carried out. Both true single-incision and dual-incision (training) cases were included in the analysis. Operative and perioperative outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Eighty SILS cholecystectomies (4 dual incision and 76 single incision) were performed from May 30, 2008 to April 23, 2009 (indications: 48 stones, 20 cholecystitis, 11 biliary dyskinesia, and 1 polyp). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.5 kg/m2 (range 17.3–39.1 kg/m2), mean operating room (OR) time was 69.5 min (range 29–126 min), mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 5 cc, and mean incision length was 1.6 cm. There were no open conversions, but there were six conversions to dual-port and three conversions to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor visualization. Complications include three bile leaks managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous drainage (3.7%). Two leaks were from accessory ducts and one was from a cystic duct stump. Number of days of postoperative oral narcotic use was described as none in 11 patients (23%), minimal (1 day) in 21 patients (45%), moderate (1–3 days) in 6 patients (13%), and heavy (≥4 days) in 9 patients (19%), with mean follow-up of 4.7 months in 60 patients.

Conclusion

SILS cholecystectomy is feasible, with acceptable morbidity. Although not directly compared in this study, postoperative recovery appears shorter than after standard laparoscopy, but more studies are needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, Chiarandini P, Anania G, Terrosu G, Sistu MA, Pasetto A (1999) Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 165(1):29–34CrossRefPubMed Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, Chiarandini P, Anania G, Terrosu G, Sistu MA, Pasetto A (1999) Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 165(1):29–34CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(4):361–364CrossRefPubMed Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(4):361–364CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG (2009) Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(2):219–222CrossRefPubMed Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG (2009) Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(2):219–222CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Langwieler TE, Nimmesgern T, Back M (2009) Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23(5):1138–1141 Langwieler TE, Nimmesgern T, Back M (2009) Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23(5):1138–1141
5.
go back to reference Eisenstein S, Greenstein AJ, Kim U, Divino CM (2008) Cystic duct stump leaks: after the learning curve. Arch Surg 143(12):1178–1183CrossRefPubMed Eisenstein S, Greenstein AJ, Kim U, Divino CM (2008) Cystic duct stump leaks: after the learning curve. Arch Surg 143(12):1178–1183CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Avgerinos C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z, Baltatzi L, Dervenis C (2009) One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):498–503 Avgerinos C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z, Baltatzi L, Dervenis C (2009) One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):498–503
7.
go back to reference Ramia JM, Muffak K, Mansilla A, Villar J, Garrote D, Ferron JA (2005) Postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy bile leak secondary to an accessory duct of Luschka. JSLS 9(2):216–217PubMed Ramia JM, Muffak K, Mansilla A, Villar J, Garrote D, Ferron JA (2005) Postlaparoscopic cholecystectomy bile leak secondary to an accessory duct of Luschka. JSLS 9(2):216–217PubMed
Metadata
Title
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases
Authors
Chris Edwards
Alan Bradshaw
Paul Ahearne
Pierre Dematos
Ted Humble
Randy Johnson
David Mauterer
Peeter Soosaar
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0943-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2010 Go to the issue