Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2010

01-08-2010

Detection of gastric conduit ischemia or anastomotic breakdown after cervical esophagogastrostomy: the use of computed tomography scan versus early endoscopy

Authors: Arzu Oezcelik, Farzaneh Banki, Shahin Ayazi, Emmanuele Abate, Joerg Zehetner, Helen J. Sohn, Jeffrey A. Hagen, Steven R. DeMeester, John C. Lipham, Suzanne L. Palmer, Tom R. DeMeester

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Concern over potential injury to the anastomosis has limited the use of early postoperative endoscopy to diagnose conduit ischemia or anastomotic breakdown. Alternatively, a computed tomography (CT) scan has been suggested as a noninvasive means for identifying these complications. This study aimed to compare CT scan with early endoscopy for diagnosing gastric conduit ischemia or anastomotic breakdown after esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Methods

Between 2000 and 2007, 554 patients underwent an esophagectomy and gastric pull-up with cervical esophagogastrostomy at the University of Southern California. Records were reviewed to identify patients who had undergone endoscopy and CT scan within 24 h of each other during the first three postoperative weeks for suspicion of an ischemic conduit or anastomotic breakdown. The accuracies of CT scan and endoscopy in diagnosing an ischemic conduit were compared.

Results

A total of 76 patients had endoscopy and CT scan for clinical suspicion of conduit ischemia or anastomotic breakdown. Endoscopy was performed without complications in all 76 patients. The postoperative endoscopic findings were normal in 24 of the patients, and none subsequently experienced an ischemic conduit or anastomotic breakdown. Evidence of ischemia was present in 28 patients, 7 of whom had black mucosa throughout the gastric conduit with the anastomosis still intact and required removal of their conduit. The remaining 24 patients had partial or complete anastomotic breakdown. On the CT scan, 23 of the 76 patients showed evidence of conduit ischemia (n = 9) or anastomotic breakdown (n = 14). There was no evidence of ischemia or anastomotic breakdown on CT scan for the 24 patients with normal endoscopy or for 3 of the 7 patients who had their conduit removed for graft necrosis.

Conclusion

A normal CT scan does not rule out the possibility of an ischemic gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Early endoscopy is a safe and accurate method for assessing conduit ischemia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hagen JA, Demeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, Demeester TR (2001) Curative resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Ann Surg 234:520–530 (discussion 530–531) Hagen JA, Demeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, Demeester TR (2001) Curative resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Ann Surg 234:520–530 (discussion 530–531)
2.
go back to reference Holscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C, Schroder W (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245:241–246CrossRefPubMed Holscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C, Schroder W (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245:241–246CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198:536–541 (discussion 541–532)CrossRefPubMed Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E, Peters JH, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198:536–541 (discussion 541–532)CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640CrossRefPubMed Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Maish MS, DeMeester SR, Choustoulakis E, Briel JW, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Lipham JC, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2005) The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc 19:1093–1102CrossRefPubMed Maish MS, DeMeester SR, Choustoulakis E, Briel JW, Hagen JA, Peters JH, Lipham JC, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2005) The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction. Surg Endosc 19:1093–1102CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Dresner SM, Richardson DL, Hayes N (2001) Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 88:1346–1351CrossRefPubMed Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Dresner SM, Richardson DL, Hayes N (2001) Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 88:1346–1351CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Detection of gastric conduit ischemia or anastomotic breakdown after cervical esophagogastrostomy: the use of computed tomography scan versus early endoscopy
Authors
Arzu Oezcelik
Farzaneh Banki
Shahin Ayazi
Emmanuele Abate
Joerg Zehetner
Helen J. Sohn
Jeffrey A. Hagen
Steven R. DeMeester
John C. Lipham
Suzanne L. Palmer
Tom R. DeMeester
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0884-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2010 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and Notices