Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010

01-04-2010

Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis

Authors: S. C. Donkervoort, O. van Ruler, L. M. Dijksman, A. A. van Geloven, E. G. Pierik

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after an endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) has higher rates for complications and conversion caused by unpredictable adhesions. The risk factors for an adverse outcome of LC after an ERC were analyzed.

Methods

Variables from patients treated by LC after ERC for cholelithiasis in two clinics from 1996 to 2003 were retrospectively stored in a database. Complications and conversions were recorded.

Results

A total of 140 patients underwent LC after ERC (83 from clinic A and 57 from clinic B), 31% (44/140) of whom were men. Peri- or postoperative complications occurred for 28 patients (20%). For 19 patients (14%), a conversion was necessary. Significant variables associated with complications and conversions were an elevated level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at the time of LC (odds ratio [OR], 10.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–91, P = 0.037 for both) and severe adhesions during laparoscopy (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.5–8.6; P = 0.003 and OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.9–14.4; P = 0.002, respectively). Male gender (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1–7.6; P = 0.037) and serum bilirubin level at the time of ERC (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.24–11; P = 0.014) were associated with conversion only. Time after ERC (LC within 1 week vs. >1 week or ≤2 weeks vs. 2–6 weeks vs. >6 weeks or ≤6 weeks vs. >6 weeks) was not associated with complications or conversion. Multivariate regression analysis showed a pre-LC CRP exceeding 6 to be predictive of complications (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.1–95; P = 0.040) and conversion (OR, 10.6; 95% CI, 1.1–99; P = 0.034).

Conclusion

Male gender, bilirubin levels during ERC, severe adhesions during LC, and pre-LC CRP levels were associated with an adverse outcome for an LC after endoscopic cholangiography. The time between LC and ERC failed to be a significant risk factor in this larger series.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cervantes J, Rojas G (2001) Choledocholithiasis: new approach to an old problem. World J Surg 25:1270–1272CrossRefPubMed Cervantes J, Rojas G (2001) Choledocholithiasis: new approach to an old problem. World J Surg 25:1270–1272CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chang KK, Mo LR, Yau MP, Lin RC, Kuo JY, Tsai CC (1996) Endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 43:203–206PubMed Chang KK, Mo LR, Yau MP, Lin RC, Kuo JY, Tsai CC (1996) Endoscopic sphincterotomy prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 43:203–206PubMed
3.
go back to reference Sarli L, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L (2003) Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience. World J Surg 27:180–186PubMed Sarli L, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L (2003) Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience. World J Surg 27:180–186PubMed
4.
go back to reference Soetikno RM, Montes H, Carr-Locke DL (1998) Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. J Clin Gastroenterol 27:296–305CrossRefPubMed Soetikno RM, Montes H, Carr-Locke DL (1998) Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis. J Clin Gastroenterol 27:296–305CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, Boerma EJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ (2002) Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:761–765CrossRefPubMed Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Janssen IM, Bolwerk CJ, Timmer R, Boerma EJ, Obertop H, Huibregtse K, Gouma DJ (2002) Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:761–765CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Allen NL, Leeth RR, Finan KR, Tishler DS, Vickers SM, Wilcox CM, Hawn MT (2006) Outcomes of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 10:292–296CrossRefPubMed Allen NL, Leeth RR, Finan KR, Tishler DS, Vickers SM, Wilcox CM, Hawn MT (2006) Outcomes of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 10:292–296CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Prat F, Malak NA, Pelletier G, Buffet C, Fritsch J, Choury AD et al (1996) Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology 110:894–899CrossRefPubMed Prat F, Malak NA, Pelletier G, Buffet C, Fritsch J, Choury AD et al (1996) Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology 110:894–899CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference De Vries A, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, Pierik EG (2005) Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter? Surg Endosc 19:996–1001CrossRefPubMed De Vries A, Donkervoort SC, van Geloven AA, Pierik EG (2005) Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter? Surg Endosc 19:996–1001CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Shaw DE, Carr-Locke DL (1989) A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones: implications for treatment. Ann Surg 209(2):157–161CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Shaw DE, Carr-Locke DL (1989) A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones: implications for treatment. Ann Surg 209(2):157–161CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Isogai M, Yamaguchi A, Harada T, Kaneoka Y, Suzuki M (2002) Cholangitis score: a scoring system to predict severe cholangitis in gallstone pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:98–104CrossRefPubMed Isogai M, Yamaguchi A, Harada T, Kaneoka Y, Suzuki M (2002) Cholangitis score: a scoring system to predict severe cholangitis in gallstone pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:98–104CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J, Matter I (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the various types of gallbladder inflammation: a prospective trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:200–207CrossRefPubMed Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J, Matter I (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the various types of gallbladder inflammation: a prospective trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:200–207CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E, Cohen A, Abrahamson J, Eldar S (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 14:755–760CrossRefPubMed Brodsky A, Matter I, Sabo E, Cohen A, Abrahamson J, Eldar S (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: can the need for conversion and the probability of complications be predicted? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 14:755–760CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, Rajnakova A, Goh PMY, Mouiel J (1997) Predictive factors for conversions of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21:629–633CrossRefPubMed Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, Rajnakova A, Goh PMY, Mouiel J (1997) Predictive factors for conversions of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21:629–633CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Chu KM (1996) Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Arch Surg 131:98–101PubMed Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Chu KM (1996) Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Arch Surg 131:98–101PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wiebke EA, Pruitt AL, Howard TJ, Jacobson LE, Broadie TA, Goulet RJ Jr, Canal DF (1996) Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: an analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 10:742–745PubMed Wiebke EA, Pruitt AL, Howard TJ, Jacobson LE, Broadie TA, Goulet RJ Jr, Canal DF (1996) Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: an analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 10:742–745PubMed
16.
go back to reference Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Reed-Fourquet L, Mattie A, Lynch J (1998) Symptomatic cholelithiasis: a different disease in men? Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholesystectomy Registry. Ann Surg 227:195–200CrossRefPubMed Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Reed-Fourquet L, Mattie A, Lynch J (1998) Symptomatic cholelithiasis: a different disease in men? Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholesystectomy Registry. Ann Surg 227:195–200CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yol S, Kartal A, Vatansev C, Aksoy F, Toy H (2006) Sex as a factor in conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. JSLS 10:359–363 Yol S, Kartal A, Vatansev C, Aksoy F, Toy H (2006) Sex as a factor in conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. JSLS 10:359–363
18.
go back to reference Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atli M, Dolapci M (2001) A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 181:520–525CrossRefPubMed Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atli M, Dolapci M (2001) A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 181:520–525CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Wayand WU (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cause of conversion in 1, 300 patients and analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 9:25–28CrossRefPubMed Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Wayand WU (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cause of conversion in 1, 300 patients and analysis of risk factors. Surg Endosc 9:25–28CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lee HK, Han HS, Min SK, Lee JH (2005) Sex-based analysis of the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92(4):463–466CrossRefPubMed Lee HK, Han HS, Min SK, Lee JH (2005) Sex-based analysis of the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92(4):463–466CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kauvar DS, Brown BD, Braswell AW, Harnisch M (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: increased operative complications and conversions to laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:379–382CrossRefPubMed Kauvar DS, Brown BD, Braswell AW, Harnisch M (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: increased operative complications and conversions to laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:379–382CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705CrossRefPubMed Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Identification of risk factors for an unfavorable laparoscopic cholecystectomy course after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis
Authors
S. C. Donkervoort
O. van Ruler
L. M. Dijksman
A. A. van Geloven
E. G. Pierik
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0659-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010 Go to the issue