Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010

01-04-2010

Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction: the reason for conversion matters

Authors: D. Dindo, M. Schafer, M. K. Muller, P.-A. Clavien, D. Hahnloser

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopy is associated with reduced hospital stay, early recovery, and decreased morbidity compared with open surgery, it is not well established for the treatment of small bowel obstruction (SBO).

Methods

This study analyzed a prospective nationwide database of the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery.

Results

From 1995 to 2006, 537 patients underwent laparoscopy for SBO. Matted adhesions were the main cause of obstruction (62.6%). Intraoperative complications occurred for 9.5% of the patients. Postoperative morbidity was 14% and mortality 0.6%. Within 30 days, 13 patients (2.4%) were readmitted because of early recurrence or complications. The conversion rate was 32.4%. The conversions resulted from inability to visualize the site of obstruction or matted adhesions (53.4%), intraoperative complications (21.3%), and small target incisions for resection (25.3%). Emergency operations were associated with higher conversion rates (43.6% vs 19.8%; p < 0.001) but not with significantly more postoperative complications (15.2% vs 11.9%; p = 0.17). Intraoperative complications and conversion were associated with significantly increased postoperative morbidity (39.2% vs 11.3%; p < 0.001 and 24.7% vs 8.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). Reactive conversion due to intraoperative complications was associated with the highest postoperative complication rate (48.6%). Morbidity for preemptive conversion due to impaired visualization/matted adhesions or a small-target incision was significantly lower (20% and 26.1%; p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores higher than 2 also were associated with postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001). However, multivariate regression analysis showed that reactive conversion was the only independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–8.64).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic management of SBO is feasible with acceptable morbidity and low mortality but with a considerable conversion rate. Early conversion is recommended to reduce postoperative morbidity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63PubMed Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63PubMed
2.
go back to reference Khaikin M, Schneidereit N, Cera S, Sands D, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Vernava AMIII, Wexner SD (2007) Laparoscopic vs open surgery for acute adhesive small bowel obstruction: patients’ outcome and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 21:742–746CrossRefPubMed Khaikin M, Schneidereit N, Cera S, Sands D, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Vernava AMIII, Wexner SD (2007) Laparoscopic vs open surgery for acute adhesive small bowel obstruction: patients’ outcome and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 21:742–746CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N, Rosenthal RJ (2006) Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg 30:535–540CrossRefPubMed Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N, Rosenthal RJ (2006) Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg 30:535–540CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ghosheh B, Salameh JR (2007) Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1, 061 cases. Surg Endosc 21:1945–1949CrossRefPubMed Ghosheh B, Salameh JR (2007) Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: review of 1, 061 cases. Surg Endosc 21:1945–1949CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Suter M, Zermatten P, Halkic N, Martinet O, Bettschart V (2000) Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure? Surg Endosc 14:478–483CrossRefPubMed Suter M, Zermatten P, Halkic N, Martinet O, Bettschart V (2000) Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure? Surg Endosc 14:478–483CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, Molkhou JM, Hay JM, Laborde Y, Gillet M, Fingerhut A (2001) Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg 71:641–646CrossRefPubMed Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, Molkhou JM, Hay JM, Laborde Y, Gillet M, Fingerhut A (2001) Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg 71:641–646CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mucha P Jr (1987) Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 67:597–620PubMed Mucha P Jr (1987) Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 67:597–620PubMed
8.
go back to reference Garrard CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, Davidson JM, Richards WO (1999) Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:10–13CrossRefPubMed Garrard CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, Davidson JM, Richards WO (1999) Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:10–13CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW (2004) Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 18:898–906CrossRefPubMed Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW (2004) Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 18:898–906CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:177–181CrossRefPubMed Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:177–181CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wullstein C, Gross E (2003) Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 90:1147–1151CrossRefPubMed Wullstein C, Gross E (2003) Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 90:1147–1151CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chosidow D, Johanet H, Montariol T, Kielt R, Manceau C, Marmuse JP, Benhamou G (2000) Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:155–159CrossRefPubMed Chosidow D, Johanet H, Montariol T, Kielt R, Manceau C, Marmuse JP, Benhamou G (2000) Laparoscopy for acute small-bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:155–159CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Al-Mulhim AA (2000) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: experience from a Saudi teaching hospital. Surg Endosc 14:157–160CrossRefPubMed Al-Mulhim AA (2000) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction: experience from a Saudi teaching hospital. Surg Endosc 14:157–160CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Strickland P, Lourie DJ, Suddleson EA, Blitz JB, Stain SC (1999) Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction? Surg Endosc 13:695–698CrossRefPubMed Strickland P, Lourie DJ, Suddleson EA, Blitz JB, Stain SC (1999) Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction? Surg Endosc 13:695–698CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Navez B, Arimont JM, Guiot P (1998) Laparoscopic approach in acute small bowel obstruction: a review of 68 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 45:2146–2150PubMed Navez B, Arimont JM, Guiot P (1998) Laparoscopic approach in acute small bowel obstruction: a review of 68 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 45:2146–2150PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, Avinoach E, Mizrahi S (2005) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 19:464–467CrossRefPubMed Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, Avinoach E, Mizrahi S (2005) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 19:464–467CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Matthews BD, Heniford BT (2007) The laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 194:882–887 discussion 887–888CrossRefPubMed Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Matthews BD, Heniford BT (2007) The laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 194:882–887 discussion 887–888CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chopra R, McVay C, Phillips E, Khalili TM (2003) Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am Surg 69:966–968PubMed Chopra R, McVay C, Phillips E, Khalili TM (2003) Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am Surg 69:966–968PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:84–87CrossRefPubMed Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:84–87CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopy for small bowel obstruction: the reason for conversion matters
Authors
D. Dindo
M. Schafer
M. K. Muller
P.-A. Clavien
D. Hahnloser
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0658-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2010 Go to the issue