Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2009

01-11-2009

Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome?

Authors: Chunkang Yang, Steven D. Wexner, Bashar Safar, Sanjay Jobanputra, Heiying Jin, Vicky KaMing Li, Juan J. Nogueras, Eric G. Weiss, Dana R. Sands

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy can be expected in a variable percentage of surgeries. Patients who experience conversion to a laparotomy may have a worse outcome than those who have a successfully completed laparoscopic procedure. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of converted cases based on whether the case was a reactive conversion (RC, due to an intraoperative complication such as bleeding or bowel injury) or a preemptive conversion (PC, due to a lack of progression or unclear anatomy).

Methods

All laparoscopic colorectal procedures converted to a laparotomy were retrospectively reviewed from data prospectively entered into an institutional review board–approved database. Patients who underwent an RC were matched with patients who underwent a PC according to age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Patients who underwent a laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR) were taken as the control group. The incidence and nature of postoperative complications, the time to liquid or regular diet, and the length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results

Of 962 laparoscopic procedures performed between 2000 and 2007, 222 (23.1%) converted to a laparotomy were identified. The 30 patients who had undergone an RC were matched with 60 patients who had undergone a PC and 60 patients who had undergone an LCR. The reasons for RC were bleeding in 14 cases, bowel injury in 6 cases, ureteric damage in 3 cases, splenic injury in 3 cases, and other complications in 4 cases. The patients who had undergone RC were more likely to have experienced a postoperative complication (50% vs 27%; p = 0.028), required longer time to toleration of a regular diet (6 vs 5 days; p = 0.03), and stayed longer in the hospital (8.1 vs 7.1 days; p = 0.080).

Conclusion

Preemptive conversion is associated with a better outcome than reactive conversion. Based on this finding, it appears preferable for the surgeon to have a low threshold for performing PC rather than awaiting the need for an RC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius G, Vollmar B, Menger MD (2003) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 17:242–246CrossRefPubMed Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius G, Vollmar B, Menger MD (2003) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 17:242–246CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17:636–640CrossRefPubMed Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17:636–640CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–767CrossRefPubMed Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Di Carlo V (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236:759–767CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490CrossRefPubMed Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45:485–490CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1315CrossRefPubMed Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1315CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lacy A, García-Valdecasas J, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué J, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for the treatment of nonmetastatid colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy A, García-Valdecasas J, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué J, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for the treatment of nonmetastatid colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch H-P, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–216CrossRefPubMed Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch H-P, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, the Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–216CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner S (2001) Converted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 15:827–832CrossRefPubMed Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner S (2001) Converted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 15:827–832CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch HP (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13:151–156CrossRefPubMed Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch HP (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13:151–156CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pandya S, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversions for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134:471–475CrossRefPubMed Pandya S, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Rusin LC (1999) Laparoscopic colectomy: indications for conversions for conversion to laparotomy. Arch Surg 134:471–475CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wexner SD (1997) Definitions of conversion—reactive vs preemptive. Presented at the 8th Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium, hosted by the Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, FL in February Wexner SD (1997) Definitions of conversion—reactive vs preemptive. Presented at the 8th Annual International Colorectal Disease Symposium, hosted by the Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, FL in February
12.
go back to reference Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11:331–335CrossRefPubMed Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11:331–335CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA, de Brauw LM, Sietses C (1997) Elective laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 11:750–753CrossRefPubMed Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA, de Brauw LM, Sietses C (1997) Elective laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 11:750–753CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36:28–34CrossRefPubMed Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD, Thorson AG, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Johansen OB, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1993) Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 36:28–34CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW, Vansant JH (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy: initial experience. Ann Surg 219:732–743CrossRefPubMed Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW, Vansant JH (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy: initial experience. Ann Surg 219:732–743CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Andersson A, Bergdahl L (1976) Urologic complications following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Arch Surg 111:969–971PubMed Andersson A, Bergdahl L (1976) Urologic complications following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Arch Surg 111:969–971PubMed
17.
go back to reference Holzman MD, Eubanks WS (1997) Laparoscopic colectomy: prospects and problems. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 7:525–539 Holzman MD, Eubanks WS (1997) Laparoscopic colectomy: prospects and problems. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 7:525–539
18.
go back to reference Slim K, Pezet D, Riff Y, Clark E, Chipponi J (1995) High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 82:1406–1408CrossRefPubMed Slim K, Pezet D, Riff Y, Clark E, Chipponi J (1995) High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 82:1406–1408CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome?
Authors
Chunkang Yang
Steven D. Wexner
Bashar Safar
Sanjay Jobanputra
Heiying Jin
Vicky KaMing Li
Juan J. Nogueras
Eric G. Weiss
Dana R. Sands
Publication date
01-11-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0414-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2009 Go to the issue