Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2009

01-07-2009

Randomized clinical trial of torsional versus linear mode ultrasonically activated devices for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: Siok S. Ching, Abeezar I. Sarela, Jeremy D. Hayden, Michael J. McMahon

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Conventional ultrasonically activated devices use linear mode vibration. Torsional mode ultrasonically activated device (TM) that oscillate around an arc have been recently introduced in the hope that the design may result in faster cutting and better hemostasis.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to TM or linear mode ultrasonically activated device (LM). Intraoperative events were recorded. Postoperatively, a sample of suction fluid was analyzed for hemoglobin concentration to calculate intraoperative blood loss.

Results

Seventy-five patients were randomized to TM and 76 patients to LM. Median blood loss was 5 (interquartile range (IQR), 1–19.7) ml with TM and 10.5 (IQR, 2.3–23) ml with LM (p = 0.105). The 95% confidence interval for the difference in median operative blood loss was −1.3 to +9.5 ml. Median gallbladder dissection time was similar in both groups (17 (IQR 11–29) minutes for TM vs. 21 (IQR, 12–29) minutes for LM; p = 0.248). Other modalities of hemostasis were required in 14 patients (19%) in the TM group compared with 21 patients (28%) in the LM group. One patient in the LM group developed postoperative hemoperitoneum and required urgent laparoscopic exploration. No patient required blood transfusion or suffered any other significant complication.

Conclusion

TM has similar effectiveness to LM for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Registration number: ISRCTN87527062 (http://​www.​controlled-trials.​com).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ching SS, McMahon MJ (2007) Comparison of linear and torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for the sealing of medium- to large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 21:1165–1169PubMedCrossRef Ching SS, McMahon MJ (2007) Comparison of linear and torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for the sealing of medium- to large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 21:1165–1169PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ching SS, Verbeke CS, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, McMahon MJ (2008) Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(6):819–824PubMedCrossRef Ching SS, Verbeke CS, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, McMahon MJ (2008) Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(6):819–824PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tsimoyiannis EC, Jabarin M, Glantzounis G, Lekkas ET, Siakas P, Stefanaki-Nikou S (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using ultrasonically activated coagulating shears. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:421–424PubMedCrossRef Tsimoyiannis EC, Jabarin M, Glantzounis G, Lekkas ET, Siakas P, Stefanaki-Nikou S (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using ultrasonically activated coagulating shears. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:421–424PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Janssen IM, Swank DJ, Boonstra O, Knipscheer BC, Klinkenbijl JH, van Goor H (2003) Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 90:799–803PubMedCrossRef Janssen IM, Swank DJ, Boonstra O, Knipscheer BC, Klinkenbijl JH, van Goor H (2003) Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 90:799–803PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, Awad AT (2008) Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:593–598PubMedCrossRef Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, Awad AT (2008) Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:593–598PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cengiz Y, Jänes A, Grehn A, Israelsson LA (2005) Randomized trial of traditional dissection with electrocautery versus ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 92:810–813PubMedCrossRef Cengiz Y, Jänes A, Grehn A, Israelsson LA (2005) Randomized trial of traditional dissection with electrocautery versus ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 92:810–813PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Amaral JF (1994) The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:92–99PubMed Amaral JF (1994) The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:92–99PubMed
9.
go back to reference Amaral JF, Chrostek C (1995) Depth of thermal injury: ultrasonically activated scalpel versus electrosurgery. Surg Endosc 9:226 Amaral JF, Chrostek C (1995) Depth of thermal injury: ultrasonically activated scalpel versus electrosurgery. Surg Endosc 9:226
10.
go back to reference Birch DW, Park A, Shuhaibar H (1999) Acute thermal injury to the canine jejunal flap: electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection. Am Surg 65:334–337PubMed Birch DW, Park A, Shuhaibar H (1999) Acute thermal injury to the canine jejunal flap: electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection. Am Surg 65:334–337PubMed
Metadata
Title
Randomized clinical trial of torsional versus linear mode ultrasonically activated devices for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
Siok S. Ching
Abeezar I. Sarela
Jeremy D. Hayden
Michael J. McMahon
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0391-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2009 Go to the issue