Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2009

01-09-2009

Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations

Authors: S. Ambardar, J. Cabot, V. Cekic, K. Baxter, T. D. Arnell, K. A. Forde, A. Nihalani, R. L. Whelan

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many surgeons rely on the umbilicus when determining the location of ports for laparoscopic procedures and falsely assume that it is located in the vertical midline. The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of variation in umbilical position and abdominal dimensions in the general population.

Methods

Torso length, abdominal girth, weight, and height were recorded for 259 patients over a 9-month period. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and used to classify patients into four groups: underweight, normal, overweight, and obese.

Results

Average umbilical position for all BMI groups was below the true vertical midpoint and dropped further caudally as BMI increased. In addition, average abdominal dimensions increased with increasing BMI. There was no statistical difference between males and females in each BMI group regarding umbilical position or abdominal dimensions.

Conclusion

There is a clear relationship between increasing BMI and a drop in umbilical position as well as an increase in abdominal dimensions. We recommend determining umbilical position and abdominal dimensions prior to placing ports and shifting port positions toward target quadrants.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ballantyne G (2000) Atlas of laparoscopic surgery, 1st edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Ballantyne G (2000) Atlas of laparoscopic surgery, 1st edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders
2.
go back to reference Wexner S (1999) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery, 1st edn. New York: Wiley-Liss Wexner S (1999) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery, 1st edn. New York: Wiley-Liss
3.
go back to reference Zucker K (1991) Surgical laparoscopy. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc. Zucker K (1991) Surgical laparoscopy. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc.
4.
go back to reference Hurd WW, Bude RO, DeLancey JO, Pearl ML (1992) The relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation: implications for laparoscopic technique. Obstet Gynecol 80(1):48–51PubMed Hurd WW, Bude RO, DeLancey JO, Pearl ML (1992) The relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation: implications for laparoscopic technique. Obstet Gynecol 80(1):48–51PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nezhat F, Brill AI, Nezhat CH, Nezhat A, Seidman DS, Nezhat C (1998) Laparoscopic appraisal of the anatomic relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 5(2):135–140PubMedCrossRef Nezhat F, Brill AI, Nezhat CH, Nezhat A, Seidman DS, Nezhat C (1998) Laparoscopic appraisal of the anatomic relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 5(2):135–140PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chee SS, Godfrey CD, Hurteau JA, Schilder JM, Rothenberg JM, Hurd WW (1998) Location of the transverse colon in relationship to the umbilicus: implications for laparoscopic techniques. J am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 5(4):385–388PubMedCrossRef Chee SS, Godfrey CD, Hurteau JA, Schilder JM, Rothenberg JM, Hurd WW (1998) Location of the transverse colon in relationship to the umbilicus: implications for laparoscopic techniques. J am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 5(4):385–388PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA, Gibby DL (2003) Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 112(1):259–265CrossRef Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA, Gibby DL (2003) Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 112(1):259–265CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations
Authors
S. Ambardar
J. Cabot
V. Cekic
K. Baxter
T. D. Arnell
K. A. Forde
A. Nihalani
R. L. Whelan
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9965-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2009 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and Notices