Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2008

01-12-2008

A defunctioning stoma significantly prolongs the length of stay in laparoscopic colorectal resection

Authors: Mark T. Cartmell, Oliver M. Jones, B. J. Moran, T. D. Cecil

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reduction in length of stay has several advantages, including healthcare costs, patient choice, and minimizing hospital acquired infections. Additionally, length of stay is a surrogate marker of rate of recovery from the physiological insult of anaesthesia and surgery and complications thereof. A well-documented short-term benefit of laparoscopic compared to open colorectal resection is reduced length of stay.

Methods

This was a review of prospectively collected data on all laparoscopic colorectal resections performed in our unit. We analyzed patients having primary colorectal anastomosis, to assess the effect of conversion compared to completion laparoscopically. Furthermore we compared those with or without diverting stoma, for the effect of stoma formation on postoperative length of stay (LOS).

Results

Two hundred and thirteen patients had a colorectal resection. Of these 133 (62%) were left-sided or rectal resections. Resection with primary colorectal anastomosis was undertaken in 112 patients. A defunctioning stoma was performed in 13/112 (12%), and 32/112 (29%) were converted as the procedure could not be completed laparoscopically.
Conversion was not significantly associated with increased LOS with weighted median of 6.5 and 6 days for conversion and no conversion, respectively. However, stoma formation significantly increased LOS to a median of 10 days compared with a median of 6 days in patients without a stoma (p = 0.001, Mann–Whitney U).

Conclusions

The need for conversion, if performed in a timely and appropriate manner, has little impact on patient outcome compared to those completed laparoscopically, with no significant increase in LOS in our experience. In contrast, a diverting stoma does prolong LOS and some of the benefits of laparoscopic surgery may be lost unless patients requiring a stoma are identified preoperatively and have intensive pre- and postoperative stoma training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(3):CD003145 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(3):CD003145
2.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Clinical Outcomes of surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059 CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM; MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM; MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM; Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM; Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47:1680–1685PubMedCrossRef Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47:1680–1685PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Miller J, Ramshaw BJ (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:197–204 Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Miller J, Ramshaw BJ (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:197–204
8.
go back to reference Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20:947–951PubMedCrossRef Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20:947–951PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226PubMedCrossRef Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96PubMedCrossRef Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chaudhri S, Brown L, Hassan I, Horgan AF (2005) Preoperative intensive, community-based versus traditional stoma education: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48:504–509PubMedCrossRef Chaudhri S, Brown L, Hassan I, Horgan AF (2005) Preoperative intensive, community-based versus traditional stoma education: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 48:504–509PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT, Skovdal J, Vennits B, Wille-Jorgensen P (2006) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931CrossRef Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT, Skovdal J, Vennits B, Wille-Jorgensen P (2006) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U (2004) The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Colorectal Dis 6:275–279PubMedCrossRef Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U (2004) The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Colorectal Dis 6:275–279PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A defunctioning stoma significantly prolongs the length of stay in laparoscopic colorectal resection
Authors
Mark T. Cartmell
Oliver M. Jones
B. J. Moran
T. D. Cecil
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9776-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2008 Go to the issue