Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2009

01-06-2009 | New Technology

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Scarless cholecystectomy

Authors: Tae Ho Hong, Young Kyoung You, Keun Ho Lee

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many laparoscopic surgeons have been attempting to reduce incisional morbidity and improve cosmetic outcomes by using fewer and smaller ports. We performed transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TUSPLC) in 15 patients with cholelithiasis by using a special “single-port” with virtually no scar.

Methods

We used an extra-small wound retractor and a surgical glove as the “single-port.” The wound retractor was set up through the small umbilical incision and the surgical glove attached with one trocar and two pipes was then fixed to the outer ring of the wound retractor. The commonly used trocar and two slim pipes attached to the surgical glove served as three working channels. Using this single-port and conventional laparoscopic instruments, such as a straight 5-mm dissector, grasper, scissors, and a 30-degree 5-mm rigid laparoscope, we performed TUSPLC in 15 patients with cholelithiasis. The overall procedure was similar to three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Results

Fifteen well-selected patients with cholelithiasis underwent TUSPLC (4 males and 11 females; mean age, 39 (range, 29–63) years). Body mass index ranged from 20 to 34 (mean, 25.2). No case required extra-umbilical skin incisions or conversion to standard laparoscopy. The mean operative time was 79 (range, 35–165) min. Blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.6 (range, 1.0–2.5) days. No postoperative complications were observed.

Conclusions

The results of our initial experience of TUSPLC in 15 well-selected patients with cholelithiasis are encouraging. All procedures were completed successfully within a reasonable time. No extra-umbilical incisions were used and virtually no scar remained. TUSPLC could be a promising alternative method for the treatment of some patients with symptomatic gallstone disease as scarless abdominal surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yu SC, Yuan RH, Chen SC, Lee WJ (1999) Combined use of mini-laparoscope and conventional laparoscope in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preservation of minimal invasiveness. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:57–62PubMedCrossRef Yu SC, Yuan RH, Chen SC, Lee WJ (1999) Combined use of mini-laparoscope and conventional laparoscope in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preservation of minimal invasiveness. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:57–62PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 16:458–464PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 16:458–464PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Osborne DA, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos EE (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: past, present, and future. Surg Technol Int 15:81–85PubMed Osborne DA, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos EE (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: past, present, and future. Surg Technol Int 15:81–85PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2003) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 90:1345–1348PubMedCrossRef Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2003) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 90:1345–1348PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW (2005) Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J 11:30–35PubMed Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW (2005) Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J 11:30–35PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K (2007) Needlescopic cholecystectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:375–379PubMedCrossRef Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K (2007) Needlescopic cholecystectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:375–379PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kagaya T (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “Twin-Port” system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:76–80PubMedCrossRef Kagaya T (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “Twin-Port” system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:76–80PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef Trichak S (2003) Three-port vs standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Poon CM, Chan KW, Ko CW, Chan KC, Lee DW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2002) Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial results of a modified technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:259–262PubMedCrossRef Poon CM, Chan KW, Ko CW, Chan KC, Lee DW, Cheung HY, Lee KW (2002) Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial results of a modified technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:259–262PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G (2000) Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:32–36PubMedCrossRef Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G (2000) Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:32–36PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21:2308–2316PubMedCrossRef Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21:2308–2316PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22:1427–1429PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22:1427–1429PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pearl JP, Ponsky JL (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1293–1300PubMedCrossRef Pearl JP, Ponsky JL (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1293–1300PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6PubMedCrossRef Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40:428–431PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40:428–431PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sclabas GM, Swain P, Swanstrom LL (2006) Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13:23–30PubMedCrossRef Sclabas GM, Swain P, Swanstrom LL (2006) Endoluminal methods for gastrotomy closure in natural orifice transenteric surgery (NOTES). Surg Innov 13:23–30PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364PubMedCrossRef Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364PubMedCrossRef
23.
Metadata
Title
Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Scarless cholecystectomy
Authors
Tae Ho Hong
Young Kyoung You
Keun Ho Lee
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0252-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2009 Go to the issue