Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2009

01-08-2009

Rescue ERCP and insertion of a small-caliber pancreatic stent to prevent the evolution of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis: a case-controlled series

Authors: László Madácsy, Gábor Kurucsai, Ildikó Joó, Szilárd Gódi, Roland Fejes, András Székely

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Recently prophylactic placement of a trans-sphincteric pancreatic stent has successfully been applied to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Rescue ERCP and emergency application of small-caliber pancreatic stents during the early course of post-ERCP pancreatitis as a possible endoscopic therapy has not been reported yet.

Methods

All patients who underwent ERCP were hospitalized for at least 24 h, with routine laboratory testing of amylase levels. Out of 1,225 ERCPs, evolution of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis was anticipated in six consecutive patients, based on severe pancreatic pain attack, more than tenfold elevation of serum amylase levels at 8 and 24 h, and moderate rise of white blood cell (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Rescue ERCP and emergency application of small-caliber (4-5F, 4-cm, Geenen stent) pancreatic stents were successfully performed in all patients within 8–20 h after the initial ERCP.

Results

Moderate to severe papillary oedema was observed in all patients during the rescue ERCP. Pancreatic pain was promptly reduced after the rescue pancreatic drainage procedure and completely diminished within 24 h after pancreatic stenting. Serum amylase levels were exponentially reduced and normalized within 72 h in all patients; no pancreatic necrosis or any other late complications were observed. Pancreatic stents could be safely removed a few days later.

Conclusion

Rescue pancreatic stenting with small-caliber prophylactic pancreatic stents seems to be a safe and effective procedure that might be feasible to stop the evolution of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis, but prospective controlled studies are clearly demanded to support this innovative approach.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, Overby CS, Aas J, Ryan ME, Bochna GS, Shaw MJ, Snady HW, Erickson RV, Moore JP, Roel JP (2001) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54(4):425–434PubMedCrossRef Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, Overby CS, Aas J, Ryan ME, Bochna GS, Shaw MJ, Snady HW, Erickson RV, Moore JP, Roel JP (2001) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54(4):425–434PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA (2003) Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 35(10):830–834PubMedCrossRef Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA (2003) Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 35(10):830–834PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, Ryan M, Parker H, Frakes JT, Fogel EL, Silverman WB, Dua KS, Aliperti G, Yakshe P, Uzer M, Jones W, Goff J, Lazzell-Pannell L, Rashdan A, Temkit M, Lehman GA (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(1):139–147PubMedCrossRef Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, Ryan M, Parker H, Frakes JT, Fogel EL, Silverman WB, Dua KS, Aliperti G, Yakshe P, Uzer M, Jones W, Goff J, Lazzell-Pannell L, Rashdan A, Temkit M, Lehman GA (2006) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 101(1):139–147PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Andriulli A, Caruso N, Quitadamo M, Forlano R, Leandro G, Spirito F, De Maio G (2003) Antisecretory vs. antiproteasic drugs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: the evidence-based medicine derived from a meta-analysis study. JOP 4(1):41–48PubMed Andriulli A, Caruso N, Quitadamo M, Forlano R, Leandro G, Spirito F, De Maio G (2003) Antisecretory vs. antiproteasic drugs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: the evidence-based medicine derived from a meta-analysis study. JOP 4(1):41–48PubMed
5.
go back to reference Smithline A, Silverman W, Rogers D, Nisi R, Wiersema M, Jamidar P, Hawes R, Lehman G (1993) Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 39(5):652–657PubMedCrossRef Smithline A, Silverman W, Rogers D, Nisi R, Wiersema M, Jamidar P, Hawes R, Lehman G (1993) Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 39(5):652–657PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tarnasky PR, Palesch YY, Cunningham JT, Mauldin PD, Cotton PB, Hawes RH (1998) Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology 115(6):1518–1524PubMedCrossRef Tarnasky PR, Palesch YY, Cunningham JT, Mauldin PD, Cotton PB, Hawes RH (1998) Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology 115(6):1518–1524PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF, Meyerson SM, Geenen JE (2003) Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 57(3):291–294PubMedCrossRef Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF, Meyerson SM, Geenen JE (2003) Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 57(3):291–294PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brackbill S, Young S, Schoenfeld P, Elta G (2006) A survey of physician practices on prophylactic pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 64(1):45–52PubMedCrossRef Brackbill S, Young S, Schoenfeld P, Elta G (2006) A survey of physician practices on prophylactic pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 64(1):45–52PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Elta GH (2008) Temporary prophylactic pancreatic stents: which patients need them? Gastrointest Endosc 67(2):262–264PubMedCrossRef Elta GH (2008) Temporary prophylactic pancreatic stents: which patients need them? Gastrointest Endosc 67(2):262–264PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Verma D, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, Levy MJ, Baron TH, Adler DG (2007) Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 65(3):394–400PubMedCrossRef Verma D, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, Levy MJ, Baron TH, Adler DG (2007) Establishing a true assessment of endoscopic competence in ERCP during training and beyond: a single-operator learning curve for deep biliary cannulation in patients with native papillary anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc 65(3):394–400PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Freeman ML (2003) Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 5(2):145–153; ReviewPubMedCrossRef Freeman ML (2003) Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 5(2):145–153; ReviewPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Agrawal D, Chak A (2004) Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 60(4):544–550PubMedCrossRef Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G, Wong RC, Sivak MV Jr, Agrawal D, Chak A (2004) Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 60(4):544–550PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Saad AM, Fogel EL, McHenry L, Watkins JL, Sherman S, Lazzell-Pannell L, Lehman GA (2008) Pancreatic duct stent placement prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction but normal manometry results. Gastrointest Endosc 67:255–261PubMedCrossRef Saad AM, Fogel EL, McHenry L, Watkins JL, Sherman S, Lazzell-Pannell L, Lehman GA (2008) Pancreatic duct stent placement prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction but normal manometry results. Gastrointest Endosc 67:255–261PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Elta GH (2008) Temporary prophylactic pancreatic stents: which patients need them? Gastrointest Endosc 67(2):262–264PubMedCrossRef Elta GH (2008) Temporary prophylactic pancreatic stents: which patients need them? Gastrointest Endosc 67(2):262–264PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Andriulli A, Forlano R, Napolitano G, Conoscitore P, Caruso N, Pilotto A, Di Sebastiano PL, Leandro G (2007) Pancreatic duct stents in the prophylaxis of pancreatic damage after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic analysis of benefits and associated risks. Digestion 75(2–3):156–163PubMedCrossRef Andriulli A, Forlano R, Napolitano G, Conoscitore P, Caruso N, Pilotto A, Di Sebastiano PL, Leandro G (2007) Pancreatic duct stents in the prophylaxis of pancreatic damage after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic analysis of benefits and associated risks. Digestion 75(2–3):156–163PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Das A, Singh P, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A (2007) Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 65(7):960–968. Epub 2007 Feb 28PubMedCrossRef Das A, Singh P, Sivak MV Jr, Chak A (2007) Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 65(7):960–968. Epub 2007 Feb 28PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Testoni PA, Bagnolo F (2001) Pain at 24 hours associated with amylase levels greater than 5 times the upper normal limit as the most reliable indicator of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 53(1):33–39PubMedCrossRef Testoni PA, Bagnolo F (2001) Pain at 24 hours associated with amylase levels greater than 5 times the upper normal limit as the most reliable indicator of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 53(1):33–39PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Testoni PA, Bagnolo F, Caporuscio S, Lella F (1999) Serum amylase measured four hours after endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reliable predictor of postprocedure pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 94(5):1235–1241PubMedCrossRef Testoni PA, Bagnolo F, Caporuscio S, Lella F (1999) Serum amylase measured four hours after endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reliable predictor of postprocedure pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 94(5):1235–1241PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Safrany L, Cotton PB (1981) A preliminary report: urgent duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis. Surgery 89(4):424–428PubMed Safrany L, Cotton PB (1981) A preliminary report: urgent duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis. Surgery 89(4):424–428PubMed
20.
go back to reference Freeman ML, Overby C, Qi D (2004) Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure and results of a modified technique to maximize success. Gastrointest Endosc 59(1):8–14PubMedCrossRef Freeman ML, Overby C, Qi D (2004) Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure and results of a modified technique to maximize success. Gastrointest Endosc 59(1):8–14PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lawrence C, Cotton PB, Romagnuolo J, Payne KM, Rawls E, Hawes RH (2007) Small prophylactic pancreatic duct stents: an assessment of spontaneous passage and stent-induced ductal abnormalities. Endoscopy 39(12):1082–1085. Epub 2007 Sep 21PubMedCrossRef Lawrence C, Cotton PB, Romagnuolo J, Payne KM, Rawls E, Hawes RH (2007) Small prophylactic pancreatic duct stents: an assessment of spontaneous passage and stent-induced ductal abnormalities. Endoscopy 39(12):1082–1085. Epub 2007 Sep 21PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rescue ERCP and insertion of a small-caliber pancreatic stent to prevent the evolution of severe post-ERCP pancreatitis: a case-controlled series
Authors
László Madácsy
Gábor Kurucsai
Ildikó Joó
Szilárd Gódi
Roland Fejes
András Székely
Publication date
01-08-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0199-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2009 Go to the issue