Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2007

01-11-2007

Randomized clinical trial comparing radially expanding trocars with conventional cutting trocars for the effects on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: T. Bisgaard, H. L. Jakobsen, B. Jacobsen, S. D. Olsen, J. Rosenberg

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Trocar incisions are important sources of pain the first days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Radially expanding trocars may cause less pain than conventional cutting trocars.

Methods

In a patient- and observer-blinded trial, 80 patients were randomized to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy using either radially expanding trocars (radial group) or conventional cutting trocars (cutting group). Two 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars were used in both treatment groups. All the patients received standardized anesthetic and analgesic treatment. The primary outcome was incisional pain. Pain was registered during mobilization using a visual analog scale (VAS) and a verbal rating scale (VRS) before and 6 h after the operation, and at postoperative days 1 and 2. The needs for a fascial incision to retract the gallbladder, active surgical hemostasis, and supplementary requirements of opioids during the hospital stay were registered. In addition, 2 days after the operation, the incidence and severity of suggilations at the trocar incisions were measured.

Results

Data from 77 patients were available for statistical analysis. In the radial group, 23 patients needed fascial incision for gallbladder retraction compared with 11 patients in the cutting group (p = 0.006). No significant intergroup differences in VAS or VRS pain scores or any other variable were found.

Conclusions

The use of radially expanding trocars has no effect on incisional pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhoyrul S, Mori T, Way LW (1996) Radially expanding dilatation: a superior method of laparoscopic trocar access. Surg Endosc 10:775–778PubMedCrossRef Bhoyrul S, Mori T, Way LW (1996) Radially expanding dilatation: a superior method of laparoscopic trocar access. Surg Endosc 10:775–778PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Steffes B, Swanstrom L, Way LW (2000) A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4:392–397PubMedCrossRef Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Steffes B, Swanstrom L, Way LW (2000) A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4:392–397PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bisgaard T (2006) Analgesic treatment after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Anesthesiology 104:835–846PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T (2006) Analgesic treatment after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a critical assessment of the evidence. Anesthesiology 104:835–846PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 90:261–269PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 90:261–269PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136:917–921PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136:917–921PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fiorillo MA, Davidson PG, Fiorillo M, D’Anna JA, Sithian N, Silich RJ (1996) 149 ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 10:52–56PubMedCrossRef Fiorillo MA, Davidson PG, Fiorillo M, D’Anna JA, Sithian N, Silich RJ (1996) 149 ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 10:52–56PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Gray AW, Bonnet F, Camu F, Fisher HBJ, McCloy RF, Neugebauer EAM, Puig MM, Rawal N, Simanski CJP (2005) A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:1396–1415PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H, Gray AW, Bonnet F, Camu F, Fisher HBJ, McCloy RF, Neugebauer EAM, Puig MM, Rawal N, Simanski CJP (2005) A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:1396–1415PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lam TY, Lee SW, So HS, Kwok SP (2000) Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg A 105:269–273CrossRef Lam TY, Lee SW, So HS, Kwok SP (2000) Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg A 105:269–273CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lau H, Brooks DC (2001) Predictive factors for unanticipated admissions after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136:1150–1153PubMedCrossRef Lau H, Brooks DC (2001) Predictive factors for unanticipated admissions after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136:1150–1153PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Oikkonen M, Purola-Lofstedt M, Makinen MT, Aromaa U (2001) Convalescence in the first week after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results from a detailed questionnaire on morbidity and recovery of daily activities. Surg Endosc 15:94–97PubMedCrossRef Oikkonen M, Purola-Lofstedt M, Makinen MT, Aromaa U (2001) Convalescence in the first week after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results from a detailed questionnaire on morbidity and recovery of daily activities. Surg Endosc 15:94–97PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tuckey JP, Morris GN, Peden CJ, Tate JJ (1996) Feasibility of day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in unselected patients. Anaesthesia 51:965–968PubMedCrossRef Tuckey JP, Morris GN, Peden CJ, Tate JJ (1996) Feasibility of day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in unselected patients. Anaesthesia 51:965–968PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Turner DJ (1996) A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:609–615PubMedCrossRef Turner DJ (1996) A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:609–615PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Randomized clinical trial comparing radially expanding trocars with conventional cutting trocars for the effects on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
T. Bisgaard
H. L. Jakobsen
B. Jacobsen
S. D. Olsen
J. Rosenberg
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9517-0

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2007 Go to the issue