Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008

01-03-2008

Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice

Authors: Imran Hassan, Y. Nancy You, Robert R. Cima, David W. Larson, Eric J. Dozois, S. A. Barnes, John H. Pemberton

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic assisted (LA) colectomy has significant patient benefits but is technically challenging. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) allows tactile feedback because the surgeon’s hand assists in retraction and dissection. This may decrease the technical difficulty and shorten the learning curve associated with performing laparoscopic colectomy. We investigated the patient selection and short-term clinical outcomes of HALS and LA since the introduction of HALS to our minimally invasive colorectal practice.

Methods

Prospectively collected data on 258 patients undergoing HALS (n = 109) or LA colectomy (n = 149) during a calendar year (2004) were analyzed. Patient and disease characteristics, operative parameters, and perioperative outcomes were compared.

Results

HALS patients were similar to LA patients in age (51 vs. 54 yrs), gender (56 vs. 52% male), body mass index (26 vs. 26 kg/m2), comorbidities (84 vs. 85% with one or more), and diagnosis (83 vs. 80% benign), but differed in incidence of previous surgery (49 vs. 30%; P = 0.008). A significantly greater proportion of HALS patients underwent complex procedures and extensive resections. Conversion rates (15 vs. 11%, P = 0.44), intraoperative complications (4 vs. 1%, P = 0.17), 30-day morbidity (18 vs. 11%, P = 0.12) and surgical reinterventions (2 vs. 1%, P = 0.58) did not differ. Recovery measured by days to flatus was not different [mean (standard deviation) 3(2) vs. 3(2) days, P = 0.26], however HALS patients had longer operative times [276(96) vs. 211(107) minutes P < 0.0001] and 1 day longer stay in hospital [6(3) vs. 5 (3) days, P = 0.0009)].

Conclusions

Patients undergoing HALS underwent more-complex procedures than LA patients but retained the short-term benefits associated with LA colectomy. HALS facilitates expansion of a minimally invasive colectomy practice to include more challenging procedures while maintaining short-term patient benefits.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. (2000) HALS study group. Surg Endosc 14(10):896–901 Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. (2000) HALS study group. Surg Endosc 14(10):896–901
2.
go back to reference Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ, et al. (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243(5):667–670; discussion 670–672PubMedCrossRef Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ, et al. (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243(5):667–670; discussion 670–672PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, et al. (2007) Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: Short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):291–307PubMedCrossRef Noel JK, Fahrbach K, Estok R, et al. (2007) Minimally invasive colorectal resection outcomes: Short-term comparison with open procedures. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):291–307PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N, et al. (2006) Laparoscopic vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49(4):464–469PubMedCrossRef Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N, et al. (2006) Laparoscopic vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49(4):464–469PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Meijer DW, Bannenberg JJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 14(10):891–895PubMedCrossRef Meijer DW, Bannenberg JJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 14(10):891–895PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kurian MS, Patterson E, Andrei VE, et al. (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an emerging technique. Surg Endosc 15(11):1277–1281PubMedCrossRef Kurian MS, Patterson E, Andrei VE, et al. (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an emerging technique. Surg Endosc 15(11):1277–1281PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: evolution to a clinically useful technique. Dis Colon Rectum 47(5):753–765PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: evolution to a clinically useful technique. Dis Colon Rectum 47(5):753–765PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Litwin DE, Darzi A, Jakimowicz J, et al. (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system: initial experience with 68 patients. Ann Surg 231(5):715–723PubMedCrossRef Litwin DE, Darzi A, Jakimowicz J, et al. (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system: initial experience with 68 patients. Ann Surg 231(5):715–723PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Maartense S, Bemelman WA, Gerritsen van der Hoop A, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a report of 150 procedures. Surg Endosc 18(3):397–401PubMedCrossRef Maartense S, Bemelman WA, Gerritsen van der Hoop A, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a report of 150 procedures. Surg Endosc 18(3):397–401PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schadde E, Smith D, Alkoraishi AS, et al. (2006) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) at a community hospital: a prospective analysis of 104 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20(7):1077–1082PubMedCrossRef Schadde E, Smith D, Alkoraishi AS, et al. (2006) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) at a community hospital: a prospective analysis of 104 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20(7):1077–1082PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kang JC, Jao SW, Chung MH, et al. (2007) The learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc 21(2): 234–237PubMedCrossRef Kang JC, Jao SW, Chung MH, et al. (2007) The learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc 21(2): 234–237PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery using GelPort. Surg Endosc 18(1):102–105PubMedCrossRef Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery using GelPort. Surg Endosc 18(1):102–105PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18(4):577–581PubMedCrossRef Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18(4):577–581PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240(6):984–991; discussion 991–992PubMedCrossRef Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240(6):984–991; discussion 991–992PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, et al. (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance? Surg Endosc 19(5):656–661PubMedCrossRef Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, et al. (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance? Surg Endosc 19(5):656–661PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, et al. (2005) Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48(5):975–981PubMedCrossRef Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, et al. (2005) Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48(5):975–981PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique. Surg Endosc 18(4):582–586PubMedCrossRef Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique. Surg Endosc 18(4):582–586PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Piotrowicz K, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 48(10):1845–1850PubMedCrossRef Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Piotrowicz K, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 48(10):1845–1850PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hassan I, Pemberton JH, Young-Fadok TM, et al. (2006) Ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: long-term functional and quality of life results. J Gastrointest Surg 10(10):1330–1336; discussion 1336–1337PubMedCrossRef Hassan I, Pemberton JH, Young-Fadok TM, et al. (2006) Ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: long-term functional and quality of life results. J Gastrointest Surg 10(10):1330–1336; discussion 1336–1337PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice
Authors
Imran Hassan
Y. Nancy You
Robert R. Cima
David W. Larson
Eric J. Dozois
S. A. Barnes
John H. Pemberton
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2008 Go to the issue