Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2008

01-01-2008

Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases

Authors: John J. Meehan, Anthony Sandler

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robotic surgery is a new technology which may expand the variety of operations a surgeon can perform with minimally invasive techniques. We present a retrospective review of our first 100 consecutive robotic cases in children.

Methods

A three-arm robot was used with one camera arm and two instrument arms. Additional accessory ports were utilized as necessary. Two different attending surgeons performed the procedures.

Results

Twenty-four different types of procedures were completed using the robot. The majority of the procedures (89%) were abdominal procedures with 11% thoracic. No urology or cardiac procedures were performed. Age ranged from 1 day to 23 years with an average age of 8.4 years. Weight ranged from 2.2 to 103 kg with a median weight of 27.9 kg. Twenty-two patients were less than 10.0 kg. Examples of cases included gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, hepatobiliary, surgical oncology, and congenital anomalies. The overall majority of cases had never been performed minimally invasively by the authors. The overall intraoperative conversion rate to open surgery was 13%. One case (1%) was converted to thoracoscopic because of lack of domain for the articulating instruments. No conversions or complications occurred as a result of injuries from the robotic instruments. Interestingly, four abdominal cases were converted to open surgery due to equipment failures or injuries from standard laparoscopic instruments used through non-robotic accessory ports.

Conclusions

Robotic surgery is safe and effective in children. An enormous variety of cases can be safely performed including complex cases in neonates and small children. Simple operations such as cholecystectomies have minimal advantages by using robotic technology but can serve as excellent teaching tools for residents and newcomers to this form of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The technology is ideal for complex hepatobiliary cases and thoracic surgery, particularly solid chest masses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, Srivastav SK, Thomas R, Davis R (2006) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology 68:1077–1081PubMedCrossRef Atug F, Castle EP, Woods M, Srivastav SK, Thomas R, Davis R (2006) Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other? Urology 68:1077–1081PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES, Zorn KC, Gong EM, Brendler CB, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology 68:1275–1279PubMedCrossRef Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES, Zorn KC, Gong EM, Brendler CB, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology 68:1275–1279PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Khaira HS, Bruyere F, O’Malley PJ, Peters JS, Costello AJ (2006) Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Brit J Urol Int 98:1275–1278 Khaira HS, Bruyere F, O’Malley PJ, Peters JS, Costello AJ (2006) Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Brit J Urol Int 98:1275–1278
4.
go back to reference Tseng TY, Kuebler HR, Cancel QV, Sun L, Springhart WP, Murphy BC, Albala DM, Dahm P (2006) Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology 68:1061–1066PubMedCrossRef Tseng TY, Kuebler HR, Cancel QV, Sun L, Springhart WP, Murphy BC, Albala DM, Dahm P (2006) Prospective health-related quality-of-life assessment in an initial cohort of patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy. Urology 68:1061–1066PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ryska M, Fronek J, Rudis J, Jurenka B, Langer D, Pudil J (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85:511–516 Ryska M, Fronek J, Rudis J, Jurenka B, Langer D, Pudil J (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85:511–516
6.
go back to reference Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C (2007) Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 21:244–246 PubMedCrossRef Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C (2007) Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 21:244–246 PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB (2006) Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg 192:746–749PubMedCrossRef Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB (2006) Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg 192:746–749PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stadler P, Matous P, Vitasek P, Spacek M (2006) Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: A review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg 44:915–919PubMedCrossRef Stadler P, Matous P, Vitasek P, Spacek M (2006) Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: A review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg 44:915–919PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 174:1440–1442PubMedCrossRef Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 174:1440–1442PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Passerotti C, Peters CA (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopy applied to reconstructive surgeries in children. World J Urol 24:193–197PubMedCrossRef Passerotti C, Peters CA (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopy applied to reconstructive surgeries in children. World J Urol 24:193–197PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P (2006) Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol 176:2237–2239PubMedCrossRef Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P (2006) Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol 176:2237–2239PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Peters CA, Woo R (2005) Intravesical robotically assisted bilateral ureteral reimplantation. J Endourol 19:618–621PubMedCrossRef Peters CA, Woo R (2005) Intravesical robotically assisted bilateral ureteral reimplantation. J Endourol 19:618–621PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Knight CG, Gidell KM, Lanning D, Lorincz A, Langenburg SE, Klein MD (2005). Laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair in children using robotic instruments. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:482–486PubMedCrossRef Knight CG, Gidell KM, Lanning D, Lorincz A, Langenburg SE, Klein MD (2005). Laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair in children using robotic instruments. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:482–486PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Woo R, Le D, Albanese CT, Kim SS (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:179–183PubMedCrossRef Woo R, Le D, Albanese CT, Kim SS (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choledochal cyst in a child. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:179–183PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chandra V, Dutta S, Albanese CT (2006) Surgical robotics and image guided therapy in pediatric surgery: emerging and converging minimal access technologies. Semin Pediatr Surg 15:267–275PubMedCrossRef Chandra V, Dutta S, Albanese CT (2006) Surgical robotics and image guided therapy in pediatric surgery: emerging and converging minimal access technologies. Semin Pediatr Surg 15:267–275PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Samadi D, Levinson A, Hakimi A, Shabsigh R, Benson MC (2006) From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic-assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience. World J Urol 25:105CrossRef Samadi D, Levinson A, Hakimi A, Shabsigh R, Benson MC (2006) From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic-assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience. World J Urol 25:105CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Meehan JJ, Georgeson KE (1997) The learning curve associated with laparoscopic antireflux surgery in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 32:426–429PubMedCrossRef Meehan JJ, Georgeson KE (1997) The learning curve associated with laparoscopic antireflux surgery in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 32:426–429PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases
Authors
John J. Meehan
Anthony Sandler
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9418-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2008 Go to the issue