Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2007

01-07-2007

Ergonomics with the use of curved versus straight laparoscopic graspers during rectosigmoid resection: results of a multiprofile comparative study

Authors: G. A. Manukyan, M. Waseda, N. Inaki, J. R. Torres Bermudez, I. A. Gacek, A. Rudinski, G. F. Buess

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A detailed ergonomic comparison of motions and muscular activity in the left upper extremity using a laparoscopic straight or curved grasper in rectosigmoid resection is presented.

Methods

The study had two parts: experimental and clinical. In the experiment part, 30 laparoscopic sigmoid resections were performed under animal organ phantom conditions. The operations were divided into three groups according to instrument and trocar position. Group 1 (n = 10) underwent operations performed with a curved grasper in the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the left-hand curved grasper placed in the right flank and the right hand instrument in the right lower quadrant. In group 2 (n = 10), straight forceps were used in the excentral trocar position. Group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparoscopic sigmoid resection performed with a straight grasper in the central position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the instruments placed at both sides of the lower abdomen. To measure ergonomic aspects during rectosigmoid resection, several overview video cameras, surface electromyography (EMG), an ultrasound tracking system (UTS), and a questionnaire were used. In the clinical part of the study, laparoscopic rectosigmoid resections (n = 5) were performed using a curved instrument in the excentral trocar position. The surgeon’s left-hand movement and body posture were recorded for further analysis.

Results

The curved grasper required the fewest contractions (group 1) of the measured muscles. A comparison of the UTS analysis in the experimental part of the study and the video analysis in the clinical part showed economy of movements in group 1. According to subjective estimation, both physical activity and mental stress remain at the lowest level when the excentral trocar position is used (groups 1 and 2).

Conclusions

The combination of the curved grasper and the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar) is, according to our examinations, the best ergonomic adjustment for laparoscopic rectosigmoid surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health (1993) Consensus development conference on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 390–398CrossRef National Institutes of Health (1993) Consensus development conference on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165: 390–398CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berguer R (1998) Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 12: 458–462PubMedCrossRef Berguer R (1998) Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 12: 458–462PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gerber S (1998) A comparative study of forces involved with manipulation of standard and laparoscopic surgical instruments [thesis]. Biomedical Engineering Program, California State University Sacramento, CA, 75 pp Gerber S (1998) A comparative study of forces involved with manipulation of standard and laparoscopic surgical instruments [thesis]. Biomedical Engineering Program, California State University Sacramento, CA, 75 pp
4.
go back to reference Berguer R, Forkey D, Smith WD (2001) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 13: 466–468CrossRef Berguer R, Forkey D, Smith WD (2001) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc 13: 466–468CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matern U, Waller P, Giebmeyer C, Ruckauer KD, Farthmann EH (2001) Ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables. JSLS 5: 7–12PubMed Matern U, Waller P, Giebmeyer C, Ruckauer KD, Farthmann EH (2001) Ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables. JSLS 5: 7–12PubMed
6.
go back to reference Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9: 436–440CrossRef Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9: 436–440CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van Veelen MA, Snijders CJ, Van Leeuwen E, Goosens RHM, Kazemier G (2003) Improvements of foot pedals used during surgery based on new ergonomic quidelines. Surg Endosc 17: 1086–1091PubMedCrossRef Van Veelen MA, Snijders CJ, Van Leeuwen E, Goosens RHM, Kazemier G (2003) Improvements of foot pedals used during surgery based on new ergonomic quidelines. Surg Endosc 17: 1086–1091PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Uhrich ML, Underwood RA, Standeven JW, Soper NJ, Engsberg JR (2002) Assessment of fatigue monitor placement and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 635–639PubMedCrossRef Uhrich ML, Underwood RA, Standeven JW, Soper NJ, Engsberg JR (2002) Assessment of fatigue monitor placement and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 635–639PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Koneczny S, Matern U (2004) Instruments for the evaluation of ergonomics in the surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13: 167–177CrossRef Koneczny S, Matern U (2004) Instruments for the evaluation of ergonomics in the surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13: 167–177CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Delagi EF, Iazzetty J, Perotto A, Morrison D (1980) Anatomic guide for the electromyographer. Charles S. Thomas, Springfield, IL Delagi EF, Iazzetty J, Perotto A, Morrison D (1980) Anatomic guide for the electromyographer. Charles S. Thomas, Springfield, IL
11.
go back to reference Konrad K (2005) The ABC of EMG: a practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography Konrad K (2005) The ABC of EMG: a practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography
12.
go back to reference Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1309–1315 Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1309–1315
13.
go back to reference Eijsbouts QAJ, de Haan J, Berends F, Sietses C, Cuesta MA (2000) Laparoscopic elective treatment of diverticular disease: a comparison between laparoscopic-assisted and resection-facilitated techniques. Surg Endosc 14: 726–730PubMedCrossRef Eijsbouts QAJ, de Haan J, Berends F, Sietses C, Cuesta MA (2000) Laparoscopic elective treatment of diverticular disease: a comparison between laparoscopic-assisted and resection-facilitated techniques. Surg Endosc 14: 726–730PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch H-P (2005) Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with nondiverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 20: 165–172PubMedCrossRef Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch H-P (2005) Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with nondiverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 20: 165–172PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tuech J-J, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud J-P (2000) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14: 1031–1033PubMedCrossRef Tuech J-J, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud J-P (2000) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14: 1031–1033PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1371–1379PubMedCrossRef Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1371–1379PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Smadja C, Sbai IM, Tahrat M, Vons C, Bobocescu E, Baillet P, Franco D (1999) Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis: results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 13: 645–648PubMedCrossRef Smadja C, Sbai IM, Tahrat M, Vons C, Bobocescu E, Baillet P, Franco D (1999) Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis: results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 13: 645–648PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tuech J-J, Regenet N, Hennekinne S, Pessaux P, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud J-P (2001) Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 15: 1427–1430PubMed Tuech J-J, Regenet N, Hennekinne S, Pessaux P, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud J-P (2001) Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 15: 1427–1430PubMed
19.
go back to reference Koeckerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Koehler L, Baerlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (1999) Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis: results of a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 13: 567–571CrossRef Koeckerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Koehler L, Baerlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (1999) Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis: results of a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 13: 567–571CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Rose J, Konradt J, Gross E, Bärlehner E, Pross M, Schmidt U, Köckerling F, Lippert H (2004) Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1883–1888PubMedCrossRef Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Rose J, Konradt J, Gross E, Bärlehner E, Pross M, Schmidt U, Köckerling F, Lippert H (2004) Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1883–1888PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting. Surg Endosc 11: 397–401PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997) Optimal port locations for endoscopic intracorporeal knotting. Surg Endosc 11: 397–401PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Goossens RHM, van Veelen MA (2001) Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10: 175–179CrossRef Goossens RHM, van Veelen MA (2001) Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10: 175–179CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hoolhorst FWB (2005) Design of a handle for curved instruments [master thesis]. Section for Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Clinic of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery. Tuebingen, Germany, 107 pp Hoolhorst FWB (2005) Design of a handle for curved instruments [master thesis]. Section for Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Clinic of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery. Tuebingen, Germany, 107 pp
24.
go back to reference Johnsson B (1978) Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work. Scand J Rehabil Med 6: 69–74 Johnsson B (1978) Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work. Scand J Rehabil Med 6: 69–74
Metadata
Title
Ergonomics with the use of curved versus straight laparoscopic graspers during rectosigmoid resection: results of a multiprofile comparative study
Authors
G. A. Manukyan
M. Waseda
N. Inaki
J. R. Torres Bermudez
I. A. Gacek
A. Rudinski
G. F. Buess
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9284-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2007 Go to the issue