Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2007

01-10-2007

A newly designed ergonomic body support for surgeons

Authors: A. Albayrak, M. A. van Veelen, J. F. Prins, C. J. Snijders, H. de Ridder, G. Kazemier

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One of the main ergonomic problems during surgical procedures is the surgeon’s awkward body posture, often accompanied by repetitive movements of the upper extremities, increased muscle activity, and prolonged static head and back postures. In addition, surgeons perform surgery so concentrated that they tend to neglect their posture. These observations suggest the advantage of supporting the surgeon’s body during surgical procedures. This study aimed to design a body support and to test its potential.

Methods

The optimum working condition for a surgeon is a compromise between the spine and arm positions and the level of effort and fatigue experienced performing a procedure. The design vision of the Medisign group has led to the development of an ergonomic body support for surgeons that is suitable for use during both open and minimally invasive procedures. The feasibility of the newly designed ergonomic body support was assessed during seven surgical procedures. Electromyography (EMG) was performed for back and leg muscles using the body support in an experimental setting.

Results

Six of seven participating surgeons indicated that the body support was comfortable, safe, and simple to use. The EMG results show that supporting the body is effective in reducing muscle activity. The average reduction using chest support was 44% for the erector spinae muscle, 20% for the semitendinosus muscle, and 74% for the gastrocnemius muscle. The average muscle reduction using semistanding support was 5% for the erector spinae, 12% for the semitendinosus muscle, and for 50% for the gastrocnemius muscle.

Conclusion

The results of this study imply that supporting the body is an effective way to reduce muscle activity, which over the long term may reduce physical problems and discomfort. Additionally, the product supports the surgeon in his natural posture during both open and minimally invasive procedures and can easily be adapted to the current layout of the operating theater.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alarcon A, Berguer R (1996) A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations. Surg Endosc 10: 916–919PubMedCrossRef Alarcon A, Berguer R (1996) A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations. Surg Endosc 10: 916–919PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Albayrak A, Kazemier G, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ (2004) Current state of ergonomics of operating rooms of Dutch hospitals in the endoscopic era. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13: 156–160CrossRef Albayrak A, Kazemier G, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ (2004) Current state of ergonomics of operating rooms of Dutch hospitals in the endoscopic era. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13: 156–160CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Albayrak A, van Veelen MA, Prins J, Snijders CJ, de Ridder H, Kazemier G (2006). Reducing muscle activity of the surgeon during surgical procedures. Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics, 16th World Congress on Ergonomics, Elsevier Ltd., Maastricht, The Netherlands Albayrak A, van Veelen MA, Prins J, Snijders CJ, de Ridder H, Kazemier G (2006). Reducing muscle activity of the surgeon during surgical procedures. Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics, 16th World Congress on Ergonomics, Elsevier Ltd., Maastricht, The Netherlands
4.
go back to reference Albayrak A, van Veelen MA, Prins J, Snijders CJ, de Ridder H, Kazemier G (2006) Rugbelasting bij chirurgen tijdens operaties: Het effect van lichaamsondersteuning. Tijdschrift voor Ergonomie 31: 10–19 Albayrak A, van Veelen MA, Prins J, Snijders CJ, de Ridder H, Kazemier G (2006) Rugbelasting bij chirurgen tijdens operaties: Het effect van lichaamsondersteuning. Tijdschrift voor Ergonomie 31: 10–19
6.
go back to reference Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11: 139–142PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11: 139–142PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berguer R, Smith WD, Davis S (2002) An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 416–421CrossRef Berguer R, Smith WD, Davis S (2002) An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 416–421CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cuschieri A (1995) Whither minimal access surgery? Tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg 169: 9–19PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A (1995) Whither minimal access surgery? Tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg 169: 9–19PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gerbrands A, Albayrak A, Kazemier G (2004) Ergonomic evaluation of the work area of the scrub nurse. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13: 142–146CrossRef Gerbrands A, Albayrak A, Kazemier G (2004) Ergonomic evaluation of the work area of the scrub nurse. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 13: 142–146CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kant I, de Jong LC, van Rijssen-Moll M, Borm PJ (1992) A survey of static and dynamic work postures of operating room staff. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 63: 423–428PubMedCrossRef Kant I, de Jong LC, van Rijssen-Moll M, Borm PJ (1992) A survey of static and dynamic work postures of operating room staff. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 63: 423–428PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kumar S, Mital A (1996) Electromyography in ergonomics. Taylor & Francis Ltd., Padstow. Kumar S, Mital A (1996) Electromyography in ergonomics. Taylor & Francis Ltd., Padstow.
12.
go back to reference Mirbod S, Yoshida H, Miyamoto K, Miyashita K, Inaba R, Iwata H (1995) Subjective complaints in orthopaedists and general surgeons. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 67: 179–186PubMed Mirbod S, Yoshida H, Miyamoto K, Miyashita K, Inaba R, Iwata H (1995) Subjective complaints in orthopaedists and general surgeons. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 67: 179–186PubMed
14.
go back to reference Muller MJ, Kuhn S (1993) Participatory design. Communications ACM 36: 24–28CrossRef Muller MJ, Kuhn S (1993) Participatory design. Communications ACM 36: 24–28CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schurr MO, Buess GF, Wieth F, Saile HJ, Botsch M (1999) Ergonomic surgeon’s chair for use during minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 244–247PubMedCrossRef Schurr MO, Buess GF, Wieth F, Saile HJ, Botsch M (1999) Ergonomic surgeon’s chair for use during minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 244–247PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Snijders CJ, Ribbers MTLM, de Bakker HV, Stoeckart R, Stam HJ (1998) EMG recordings of abdominal and back muscles in various standing postures: validation of a biomechanical model on sacroiliac joint stability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8: 205–214PubMedCrossRef Snijders CJ, Ribbers MTLM, de Bakker HV, Stoeckart R, Stam HJ (1998) EMG recordings of abdominal and back muscles in various standing postures: validation of a biomechanical model on sacroiliac joint stability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8: 205–214PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference van Veelen MA, Kazemier G, Koopman J, Goossens RHM, Meijer DW (2002) Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12: 47–52PubMedCrossRef van Veelen MA, Kazemier G, Koopman J, Goossens RHM, Meijer DW (2002) Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12: 47–52PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Uijttewaal I, Goossens RHM, Snijders CJ, Kazemier G (2003) Improvement of the laparoscopic needleholder based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc 17: 699–703PubMedCrossRef van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Uijttewaal I, Goossens RHM, Snijders CJ, Kazemier G (2003) Improvement of the laparoscopic needleholder based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc 17: 699–703PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A newly designed ergonomic body support for surgeons
Authors
A. Albayrak
M. A. van Veelen
J. F. Prins
C. J. Snijders
H. de Ridder
G. Kazemier
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9249-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2007 Go to the issue