Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2007

01-06-2007

The introducer technique is the optimal method for placing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients

Authors: Jason M. Foster, Peter Filocamo, Hector Nava, Michael Schiff, Wesley Hicks, Nestor Rigual, Judy Smith, Thom Loree, John F. Gibbs

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are often placed in head and neck cancer patients to provide nutritional support, but studies have found the complication rates to be higher than other subsets of patients who undergo PEG placement. Complication rates as high as 50% have been reported, with the bulk of these complications being PEG site issues (i.e., cellulitis, abscess, fascitis, and tumor implantation). Because the pull technique has been the primary technique used, the theory is that the transoral tube passage is the source of the complications in these patients. Alternatively, the introducer technique uses a transabdominal approach to place the device, avoiding any tube contamination by upper aerodigestive organisms or tumor cells. At our institution, this technique has been used exclusively for head and neck cancer patients and this article reports our experience.

Methods

One hundred forty-nine head and neck cancer patients who had a prophylactic PEG tube placed were reviewed from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2003. The rates of placement success, morbidity, and complications were determined.

Results

Successful placement was achieved in 148 (99%) patients without any PEG-related deaths. Overall, 17 complications (11%) occurred, with only one major complication (0.7%) identified. PEG site infections were uncommon with only five cases (3.4%) and all were mild cellulitis.

Conclusions

The introducer technique is the safest method for PEG tube placement in head and neck cancer patients. The overall rate of complications is low and PEG site infectious complications are rare. The introducer technique should be the method of choice for PEG tubes in head and neck cancer patients.
Literature
1.
Akkersdijk WL, van Bergeijk JD, van Egmond T, Mulder CJ, van Berge Henegouwen GP, van deer Werken C, van Erpecum KJ (1995) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of push and pull methods and evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis. Endoscopy 27(4): 313–316PubMed
2.
Alverdy JC, Aoys E, Moss GS (1988) Total parenteral nutrition promotes bacterial translocation from the gut. Surgery 104(2): 185–190PubMed
3.
Baredes S, Behin D, Deitch E (2004) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer. Ear Nose Throat J 83(6): 417–419PubMed
4.
Beaver ME, Myers JN, Griffenberg L, Waugh K (1998) Percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(10): 1141–1144PubMed
5.
Border JR, Hassett J, LaDuca J, Seibel R, Steinberg S, Mille B, Losi P, Border D (1987) The gut origin septic states in blunt multiple trauma (ISS = 40) in the ICU. Ann Surg 206(4): 427–448PubMedCrossRef
6.
Bozzetti F (2002) Rationale and indications for preoperative feeding of malnourished surgical cancer patients. Nutrition 18(11-12): 953–959PubMedCrossRef
7.
Brown AS, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT Jr (1986) Controlled percutaneous gastrostomy: nylon T-fastener for fixation of the anterior gastric wall. Radiology 158(2): 543–545PubMed
8.
Bushnell L, White TW, Hunter JG (1991) Metastatic implantation of laryngeal carcinoma at a PEG exit site. Gastrointest Endosc 37(4): 480–482PubMed
9.
Capra S, Ferguson M, Ried K (2001) Cancer: impact of nutrition intervention outcome—nutrition issues for patients. Nutrition 17(9): 769–772PubMedCrossRef
10.
Chandu A, Smith AC, Douglas M (2003) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients undergoing resection for oral tumors: a retrospective review of complications and outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61(11): 1279–1284PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
Cruz I, Mamel JJ, Brady PG, Cass-Garcia M (2005) Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 62(5): 708-711; quiz 752, 753PubMedCrossRef
13.
de Luis DA, Aller R, Izaola O, Cuellar L, Terroba MC (2002) Postsurgery enteral nutrition in head and neck cancer patients. Eur J Clin Nutr 56(11): 1126-1129PubMedCrossRef
14.
Ehrsson YT, Langius-Eklof A, Bark T, Laurell G (2004) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)—a long-term follow-up study in head and neck cancer patients. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29(6): 740–746PubMedCrossRef
15.
Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 15(6): 872–875PubMedCrossRef
16.
Gossner L, Keymling J, Hahn EG, Ell C (1999) Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a prospective randomized clinical trial. Endoscopy 31(2): 119–124PubMedCrossRef
17.
Hunter JG (2003) Tumor implantation at PEG exit sites in head and neck cancer patients: how much evidence is enough? J Clin Gastroenterol 37(4): 280PubMedCrossRef
18.
Keymling M (1994) Technical aspects of enteral nutrition. Gut 35(1 Suppl): S77–S80PubMed
19.
Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Ryan JA Jr (1986) When push comes to shove: a comparison between two methods of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 81(8): 642–646PubMed
20.
Lobato-Mendizabal E, Lopez-Martinez B, Ruiz-Arguelles GJ (2003) A critical review of the prognostic value of the nutritional status at diagnosis in the outcome of therapy of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Rev Invest Clin 55(1): 31–35PubMed
21.
Logemann JA, Bytell DE (1979) Swallowing disorders in three types of head and neck surgical patients. Cancer 44(3): 1095–1105PubMedCrossRef
22.
Maetani I, Tada T, Ukita T, Inoue H, Sakai Y, Yoshikawa M (2003) PEG with introducer or pull method: a prospective randomized comparison. Gastrointest Endosc 57(7): 837–841PubMedCrossRef
23.
Maetani I, Yasuda M, Seike M, Ikeda M, Tada T, Ukita T, Sakai Y (2005) Efficacy of an overtube for reducing the risk of peristomal infection after PEG placement: a prospective, randomized comparison study. Gastrointest Endosc 61(4): 522–527PubMedCrossRef
24.
Martini DV, Har-El G, Lucente FE, Slavit DH (1997) Swallowing and pharyngeal function in postoperative pharyngeal cancer patients. Ear Nose Throat J 76(7): 450–453, 456PubMed
25.
Murry T, Madasu R, Martin A, Robbins KT (1998) Acute and chronic changes in swallowing and quality of life following intraarterial chemoradiation for organ preservation in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 20(1): 31–37PubMedCrossRef
26.
Robertson FM, Crombleholme TM, Latchaw LA, Jacir NN (1996) Modification of the “push” technique for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and children. J Am Coll Surg 182(3): 215–218PubMed
27.
Russell TR, Brotman M, Norris F (1984) Percutaneous gastrostomy. A new simplified and cost-effective technique. Am J Surg 148(1): 132-137PubMedCrossRef
28.
Sabnis A, Liu R, Chand B, Ponsky J (2006) SLiC technique. A novel approach to percutaneous gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 20(2): 256–262PubMedCrossRef
29.
Saunders JR Jr, Brown MS, Hirata RM, Jaques DA (1991) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with head and neck malignancies. Am J Surg 162(4): 381–383PubMedCrossRef
30.
Sharma P, Berry SM, Wilson K, Neale H, Fink AS (1994) Metastatic implantation of an oral squamous-cell carcinoma at a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site. Surg Endosc 8(10): 1232–1235PubMedCrossRef
31.
Thakore JN, Mustafa M, Suryaprasad S, Agrawal S (2003) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy associated gastric metastasis. J Clin Gastroenterol 37(4): 307–311PubMedCrossRef
32.
Thompson JS, Vaughan WP, Forst CF, Jacobs DL, Weekly JS, Rikkers LF (1987) The effect of the route of nutrient delivery on gut structure and diamine oxidase levels. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 11(1): 28–32PubMed
33.
Torosian MH, Rombeau JL (1980) Feeding by tube enterostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 150(6): 918–927PubMed
34.
Tucker AT, Gourin CG, Ghegan MD, Porubsky ES, Martindale RG, Terris DJ (2003) ‘Push’ versus ‘pull’ percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope 113(11): 1898–1902PubMedCrossRef
35.
Twomey PL, Patching SC (1985) Cost-effectiveness of nutritional support. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 9(1): 3–10PubMedCrossRef
36.
van Erpecum KJ, Akkersdijk WL, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, van Berge Henegouwen GP, van Vroonhoven TJ (1995) Metastasis of hypopharyngeal carcinoma into the gastrostomy tract after placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy catheter. Endoscopy 27(1): 124–127PubMedCrossRef
37.
Vokes EE, Kies MS, Haraf DJ, Stenson K, List M, Humerickhouse R, Dolan ME, Pelzer H, Sulzen L, Witt ME, Hsieh YC, Mittal BB, Weichselbaum RR (2000) Concomitant chemoradiotherapy as primary therapy for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol 18(8): 1652–1661PubMed
Metadata
Title
The introducer technique is the optimal method for placing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients
Authors
Jason M. Foster
Peter Filocamo
Hector Nava
Michael Schiff
Wesley Hicks
Nestor Rigual
Judy Smith
Thom Loree
John F. Gibbs
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9068-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2007 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Self-expanding Polyflex plastic stents in esophageal disease: various indications, complications, and outcomes

Technique

Laparoscopic duodenal atresia repair using surgical U-clips: a novel technique

Dynamic Manuscipt

Initial experience with a novel endoscopic device allowing intragastric manipulation and plication

OriginalPaper

Teaching robotic surgery: a stepwise approach

Technique

Interventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy

OriginalPaper

Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures