Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2007

01-02-2007

Thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates the restoration of bowel function and dietary intake in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection using a traditional, nonaccelerated, perioperative care program

Authors: A. Taqi, X. Hong, G. Mistraletti, B. Stein, P. Charlebois, F. Carli

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This randomized trial compared thoracic epidural analgesia with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using morphine for laparoscopic colectomy in a traditional, nonaccelerated, perioperative care program.

Methods

In the study, 50 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colon resection were randomized to either PCA morphine (n = 25) or thoracic epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and fentanyl (n = 25). Both groups received general anesthesia and multimodal pain relief, which included naproxen and acetaminophen for as long as 4 postoperative days. Time until passage of gas and bowel movements, dietary intake, postoperative quality of analgesia, readiness for discharge, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results

Recovery of postoperative ileus occurred sooner in the epidural group (p < 0.005) by an average 1 to 2 days, and resumption of full diet was achieved earlier (p < 0.05). Intensity of pain during the first 2 postoperative days was significantly lower at rest, with coughing, and with walking in the epidural group (p < 0.005). Readiness for discharge and hospital length of stay (5 days) were otherwise similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

When a traditional perioperative care program is used for laparoscopic colectomy, thoracic epidural analgesia is superior to PCA in accelerating the return of bowel function and dietary intake, while providing better pain relief.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1111–1124CrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1111–1124CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hildebrabdt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius C, Vollmar B, Menger MD (2002) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 17: 242–246CrossRef Hildebrabdt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, Pistorius C, Vollmar B, Menger MD (2002) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 17: 242–246CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carli F, Galeone M, Gzodic B, Hong X, Fried GM, Wykes L, Eberhart L, Schricker T (2005) Laparoscopic colon resection improves postoperative glucose utilization without protein-sparing effect. Arch Surg 140: 593–597CrossRef Carli F, Galeone M, Gzodic B, Hong X, Fried GM, Wykes L, Eberhart L, Schricker T (2005) Laparoscopic colon resection improves postoperative glucose utilization without protein-sparing effect. Arch Surg 140: 593–597CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kehlet H (2002) Clinical trials and laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 12: 137–138CrossRef Kehlet H (2002) Clinical trials and laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 12: 137–138CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast-track surgery. BMJ 322: 473–476CrossRef Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast-track surgery. BMJ 322: 473–476CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen S, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232: 51–57CrossRef Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen S, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232: 51–57CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, Billesbolle P, Lund C, Mogesen T, Rosemberg J, Kehlet H (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection. Ann Surg 241: 416–423CrossRef Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, Billesbolle P, Lund C, Mogesen T, Rosemberg J, Kehlet H (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection. Ann Surg 241: 416–423CrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Liu S (2004) Anesthesia and analgesia for colon surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29: 52–57CrossRef Liu S (2004) Anesthesia and analgesia for colon surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29: 52–57CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carli F, Trudel J, Belliveau P (2001) The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 1083–1089CrossRef Carli F, Trudel J, Belliveau P (2001) The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 1083–1089CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Neudecker J, Schwenk W, Junghans T, Pietsch S, Bohm B, Muller JM (1999) Randomized controlled trial to examine the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Br J Surg 86: 1292–1295CrossRef Neudecker J, Schwenk W, Junghans T, Pietsch S, Bohm B, Muller JM (1999) Randomized controlled trial to examine the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Br J Surg 86: 1292–1295CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Whalley D, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Duepree HJ, Fazio VW (2001) Epidural anesthesia-analgesia shortens length of stay after laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign pathology. Surgery 129: 672–676CrossRef Senagore AJ, Whalley D, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Duepree HJ, Fazio VW (2001) Epidural anesthesia-analgesia shortens length of stay after laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign pathology. Surgery 129: 672–676CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Holte K (2001) Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg 182: 3S–10SCrossRef Kehlet H, Holte K (2001) Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg 182: 3S–10SCrossRef
14.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229CrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leroy J Jamali F, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for colorectal cancer: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18: 281–289CrossRef Leroy J Jamali F, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for colorectal cancer: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18: 281–289CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Gensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H (1995) Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilization. Lancet 345: 763–764CrossRef Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Gensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H (1995) Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilization. Lancet 345: 763–764CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Dgan A, Fazio VW (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Br J Surg 90: 1195–1199CrossRef Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Dgan A, Fazio VW (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Br J Surg 90: 1195–1199CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zutshi M, Delaney C, Senagore AJ, Mekhail N, Lewis B, Connor JT, Fazio VW (2005) Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Am J Surg 189: 268–272CrossRef Zutshi M, Delaney C, Senagore AJ, Mekhail N, Lewis B, Connor JT, Fazio VW (2005) Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Am J Surg 189: 268–272CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Carli F, Kehlet H (2005) Continuous epidural analgesia for colonic surgery: but what about the future? Reg Anesth Pain Med 30: 140–142CrossRef Carli F, Kehlet H (2005) Continuous epidural analgesia for colonic surgery: but what about the future? Reg Anesth Pain Med 30: 140–142CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Carli F, Mayo N (2001) Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges? Br J Anaesth 87: 531–533CrossRef Carli F, Mayo N (2001) Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges? Br J Anaesth 87: 531–533CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates the restoration of bowel function and dietary intake in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection using a traditional, nonaccelerated, perioperative care program
Authors
A. Taqi
X. Hong
G. Mistraletti
B. Stein
P. Charlebois
F. Carli
Publication date
01-02-2007
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0069-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2007 Go to the issue