Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2006

01-09-2006

Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator

Authors: C. R. Larsen, T. Grantcharov, R. Aggarwal, A. Tully, J. L. Sørensen, T. Dalsgaard, B. Ottesen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Safe realistic training and unbiased quantitative assessment of technical skills are required for laparoscopy. Virtual reality (VR) simulators may be useful tools for training and assessing basic and advanced surgical skills and procedures. This study aimed to investigate the construct validity of the LapSimGyn VR simulator, and to determine the learning curves of gynecologists with different levels of experience.

Methods

For this study, 32 gynecologic trainees and consultants (juniors or seniors) were allocated into three groups: novices (0 advanced laparoscopic procedures), intermediate level (>20 and <60 procedures), and experts (>100 procedures). All performed 10 sets of simulations consisting of three basic skill tasks and an ectopic pregnancy program. The simulations were carried out on 3 days within a maximum period of 2 weeks. Assessment of skills was based on time, economy of movement, and error parameters measured by the simulator.

Results

The data showed that expert gynecologists performed significantly and consistently better than intermediate and novice gynecologists. The learning curves differed significantly between the groups, showing that experts start at a higher level and more rapidly reach the plateau of their learning curve than do intermediate and novice groups of surgeons.

Conclusion

The LapSimGyn VR simulator package demonstrates construct validity on both the basic skills module and the procedural gynecologic module for ectopic pregnancy. Learning curves can be obtained, but to reach the maximum performance for the more complex tasks, 10 repetitions do not seem sufficient at the given task level and settings. LapSimGyn also seems to be flexible and widely accepted by the users.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91: 1549–1558PubMedCrossRef Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91: 1549–1558PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR Jr., Sierra R, Massarweh NN, Dunne JB, Yau JB, Scott DJ (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough? J Surg Res 122: 150–156PubMedCrossRef Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR Jr., Sierra R, Massarweh NN, Dunne JB, Yau JB, Scott DJ (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough? J Surg Res 122: 150–156PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Lew JI, Egan A, Christos P, Fowler DL (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19: 401–405PubMedCrossRef Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Lew JI, Egan A, Christos P, Fowler DL (2005) Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 19: 401–405PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eriksen JR, Grantcharov T (2005) Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator. Surg Endosc 19: 1216–1219PubMedCrossRef Eriksen JR, Grantcharov T (2005) Objective assessment of laparoscopic skills using a virtual reality stimulator. Surg Endosc 19: 1216–1219PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM (2003) Fundamental principles of validation and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 17: 1525–1529PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Satava RM (2003) Fundamental principles of validation and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg Endosc 17: 1525–1529PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2002) Assessment of technical surgical skills. Eur J Surg 168: 139–144PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2002) Assessment of technical surgical skills. Eur J Surg 168: 139–144PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185: 146–149PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185: 146–149PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J, Pahle E, Funch-Jensen P (2001) Virtual reality computer simulation. Surg Endosc 15: 242–244PubMedCrossRef Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J, Pahle E, Funch-Jensen P (2001) Virtual reality computer simulation. Surg Endosc 15: 242–244PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, Reznick RK, Matsumoto ED, Sidhu RS, Jarvi KA (2004) The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 240: 374–381PubMedCrossRef Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, Reznick RK, Matsumoto ED, Sidhu RS, Jarvi KA (2004) The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 240: 374–381PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16: 1324–1328PubMedCrossRef Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16: 1324–1328PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lidegaard O, Hammerum MS (2002) The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control. Ugeskr Laeger 164: 4420–4423PubMed Lidegaard O, Hammerum MS (2002) The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control. Ugeskr Laeger 164: 4420–4423PubMed
12.
go back to reference Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327: 1032–1037PubMedCrossRef Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A (2003) Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 327: 1032–1037PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18: 485–494PubMedCrossRef Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18: 485–494PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Sherman V, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Kazmi R, Fried GM (2005) Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc 19: 678–682PubMedCrossRef Sherman V, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Kazmi R, Fried GM (2005) Assessing the learning curve for the acquisition of laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator. Surg Endosc 19: 678–682PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wanzel KR, Ward M, Reznick RK (2002) Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg 39: 573–659PubMedCrossRef Wanzel KR, Ward M, Reznick RK (2002) Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg 39: 573–659PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator
Authors
C. R. Larsen
T. Grantcharov
R. Aggarwal
A. Tully
J. L. Sørensen
T. Dalsgaard
B. Ottesen
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0745-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2006 Go to the issue