Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Intracorporeal rectal stapling following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision

Overcoming a challenge

Authors: A. E. Brannigan, S. De Buck, P. Suetens, F. Penninckx, A. D’Hoore

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Division of the rectum following total mesorectal excision (TME) using intracorporeal stapling devices is technically difficult due to their width and limited roticulation. More than one cartridge is often required and resultant wedging of the stump may be associated with an appreciable leak rate.

Methods

Three-dimensional reconstruction was performed of CT and MRI images from the lower abdomen of six patients undergoing laparoscopic TME using the Amira software environment. The stapling device was virtually reconstructed by in-house developed software, superimposed over the point of division of the rectum and the site of skin entry identified.

Results

The 45° angulation of available roticulating stapling devices precludes perpendicular division of the rectum following laparoscopic TME. The optimal angulation for transverse rectal stapling varied between 62° and 68°.

Conclusion

A roticulating stapler with minimum angulation of 65° would achieve transverse division of the rectum following laparoscopic TME.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Veldink GJ, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21: 277–281PubMedCrossRef Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Veldink GJ, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ (2004) Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 21: 277–281PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bemelman WA, D’Hoore A (2005) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 88–93) [Letter]. Br J Surg 92: 493PubMedCrossRef Bemelman WA, D’Hoore A (2005) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 88–93) [Letter]. Br J Surg 92: 493PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Couderc P, Rullier A, Sairc J (2003) Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 5: 451–453PubMedCrossRef Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Couderc P, Rullier A, Sairc J (2003) Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 5: 451–453PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Delgado S, Momblán D, Salvador L, Bravo R, Castells A, Ibarzabal A, Piqué JM, Lacy AM (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients; lessons learned from > 200 patients. Surg Endosc 18: 1457–1462PubMedCrossRef Delgado S, Momblán D, Salvador L, Bravo R, Castells A, Ibarzabal A, Piqué JM, Lacy AM (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients; lessons learned from > 200 patients. Surg Endosc 18: 1457–1462PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Morino M, Parinin U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet Contul R, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237: 335–342PubMedCrossRef Morino M, Parinin U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet Contul R, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237: 335–342PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rivadeneira DE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Schoetz DJ Jr (2004) Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1371–1376PubMedCrossRef Rivadeneira DE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Schoetz DJ Jr (2004) Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1371–1376PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tsang WWC, Chung CC, Kwok SY, Li MKW (2005) Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 85: 61–73PubMedCrossRef Tsang WWC, Chung CC, Kwok SY, Li MKW (2005) Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 85: 61–73PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vithiananthan S, Cooper Z, Betten K, Stapleton GS, Carter J, Huang EH, Whelan RL (2001) Hybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 927–935PubMedCrossRef Vithiananthan S, Cooper Z, Betten K, Stapleton GS, Carter J, Huang EH, Whelan RL (2001) Hybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 927–935PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio VW (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 243–250PubMedCrossRef Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio VW (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 243–250PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2004) A comparison of the complication rates between laparoscopic colectomy and laparoscopic low anterior resection. Surg Endosc 18: 1447–1451PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2004) A comparison of the complication rates between laparoscopic colectomy and laparoscopic low anterior resection. Surg Endosc 18: 1447–1451PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Intracorporeal rectal stapling following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
Overcoming a challenge
Authors
A. E. Brannigan
S. De Buck
P. Suetens
F. Penninckx
A. D’Hoore
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0536-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2006 Go to the issue