Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

Surgeon-initiated screening colonoscopy program based on SAGES and ASCRS recommendations in a general surgery practice

Authors: E. A. Goldenberg, L. Khaitan, I.-P. Huang, C. D. Smith, E. Lin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine the utility of a screening colonoscopy program initiated by general surgeons in an academic center.

Methods

New patients presenting to three general surgeons who met screening colonoscopy indications were asked whether they had undergone colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The patients who had not undergone CRC screening were offered screening colonoscopies or referred to their gastroenterologists.

Results

In the first 9-month period of the program, 200 patients who met the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons/American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons indications for CRC screening were asked whether they had undergone screenings. Only 46% (n = 92) reported any prior appropriate screenings. Of the patients who elected CRC screening by the surgeons, 55 underwent full colonoscopies (2 concurrently with hemorrhoidectomies), and 2 had flexible sigmoidoscopies. As a result of screening, 10 patients (18%) required treatment: 7 had polypectomies, 2 had partial colectomies, and 1 with an indication for surgery deferred treatment.

Conclusions

Most of the patients presenting to the general surgeon likely have not had CRC screening, and diligence in making appropriate recommendations should be routine. Colonoscopic findings requiring intervention are not insignificant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2004) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, p 4 American Cancer Society (2004) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, p 4
2.
go back to reference Corbett M, Chambers SL, Shadbolt B, Hillman LC, Taupin D (2004) Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: the outcomes of two recruitment methods. Med J Australia. 181: 423–427PubMed Corbett M, Chambers SL, Shadbolt B, Hillman LC, Taupin D (2004) Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: the outcomes of two recruitment methods. Med J Australia. 181: 423–427PubMed
3.
go back to reference Detsky AS (2001) Screening for colon cancer: can we afford colonoscopy? N Engl J Med 345: 607–608PubMedCrossRef Detsky AS (2001) Screening for colon cancer: can we afford colonoscopy? N Engl J Med 345: 607–608PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Etzioni DA, Ponce NA, Babey SH, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Ko CY, Chawla N, Breen N, Klabunde CN (2004) A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Cancer 101: 2523–2532PubMedCrossRef Etzioni DA, Ponce NA, Babey SH, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Ko CY, Chawla N, Breen N, Klabunde CN (2004) A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Cancer 101: 2523–2532PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, Bowrish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) A comparison of virtual and and conventional colonscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341: 1496–1503PubMedCrossRef Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, Bowrish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) A comparison of virtual and and conventional colonscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341: 1496–1503PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME, Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2004) Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 351: 2704–2714PubMedCrossRef Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME, Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2004) Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 351: 2704–2714PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, Chattopadhyay SK, Nadel MR, Tangka FK, Molinari NA (2004) Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 127: 1661–1669PubMedCrossRef Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Dong FB, Chattopadhyay SK, Nadel MR, Tangka FK, Molinari NA (2004) Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? Gastroenterology 127: 1661–1669PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sheikh RA, Kapre S, et al. (2004) Screening preferences for colorectal cancer: a patient demographic study. Southern Medical Journal 97: 224–230PubMedCrossRef Sheikh RA, Kapre S, et al. (2004) Screening preferences for colorectal cancer: a patient demographic study. Southern Medical Journal 97: 224–230PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Fendrick AM (2004) Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20: 507–515PubMedCrossRef Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA, Hofer TP, Fendrick AM (2004) Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20: 507–515PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgeon-initiated screening colonoscopy program based on SAGES and ASCRS recommendations in a general surgery practice
Authors
E. A. Goldenberg
L. Khaitan
I.-P. Huang
C. D. Smith
E. Lin
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0294-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2006 Go to the issue