Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2006

01-02-2006

Endoscopic evaluation of the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass

A series of 340 patients without postoperative leak

Authors: N. Sekhar, A. Torquati, R. Lutfi, W. O. Richards

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A significant and potentially deadly complication of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is leakage from the gastrojejunostomy (GJ). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative endoscopy in preventing postoperative anastomotic leakage.

Methods

The study enrolled 340 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures performed from January 2001 to July 2004. In all cases, an endoscopist performed video gastroscopy to evaluate the integrity of the GJ using air insufflation of the pouch after distal clamping of the Roux limb. Intraoperative leaks were repaired and the anastomosis was retested. Demographic, operative, and endoscopic data were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression was used in both univariate and multivariate modeling to identify independent preoperative variables associated with the presence of intraoperative leak. Model parameters were estimated by the maximum likelihood method. From these estimates, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed.

Results

There were no postoperative anastomotic leaks or mortalities in our series. Overall, endoscopic evaluation of the GJ resulted in the detection of 56 intraoperative leaks (16.4%). There was a significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative leakage for patients older than 40 years (21%) vs those younger than 40 years (10.5%; p = 0.01). In the initial 91 cases, the GJ was performed by the end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) technique; the subsequent 249 were performed with a combination of linear stapling and handsewn technique. There was a trend toward more leakage in the GIA group (18%) versus EEA (12%); however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.188). Age remained an independent risk factor for leak detected intraoperatively in the multivariate logistic regression model after adjusting for covariates. Age >40 years increased the risk of intraoperative leakage by 2.3 times (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.6; p = 0.01). The rate of postoperative anastomotic stricture was the same among patients detected with an intraoperative leak (5.4%) and those without (5.6%; p = 0.934).

Conclusions

Endoscopic evaluation of the GJ is a sensitive and reliable technique for demonstrating anastomotic integrity and preventing postoperative morbidity after gastric bypass. Age >40 years was identified as an independent risk factor for intraoperative leak in this series.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brolin RE (2000) Complications of surgery for severe obesity. Probl Gen Surg 17: 55–61 Brolin RE (2000) Complications of surgery for severe obesity. Probl Gen Surg 17: 55–61
2.
go back to reference Champion JK, Hunt T, DeLisle N (2002) Role of routine intraoperative endoscopy in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1663–1665CrossRefPubMed Champion JK, Hunt T, DeLisle N (2002) Role of routine intraoperative endoscopy in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1663–1665CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM (2004) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among U.S. children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. J Am Med Assoc 291: 2847–2850CrossRef Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM (2004) Prevalence of overweight and obesity among U.S. children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. J Am Med Assoc 291: 2847–2850CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T (2000) Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients—what have we learned? Obes Surg 10: 509–513CrossRefPubMed Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T (2000) Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients—what have we learned? Obes Surg 10: 509–513CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick JR, Zapas JL (1998) Divided gastric bypass: a fifteen-year experience. Am Surg 64: 62–66PubMed Kirkpatrick JR, Zapas JL (1998) Divided gastric bypass: a fifteen-year experience. Am Surg 64: 62–66PubMed
6.
go back to reference Livingston EH (2004) Procedure incidence and in-hospital complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States. Am J Surg 188: 105–110PubMed Livingston EH (2004) Procedure incidence and in-hospital complication rates of bariatric surgery in the United States. Am J Surg 188: 105–110PubMed
7.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234: 279–291CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee SJ, Wolfe BM (2001) Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 234: 279–291CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ramanathan R, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, Schauer PR (2000) The value of intraoperative endoscopy during laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 14: 212 Ramanathan R, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, Schauer PR (2000) The value of intraoperative endoscopy during laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 14: 212
9.
go back to reference Shin RB (2004) Intraoperative endoscopic test resulting in no postoperative leaks from the gastric pouch and gastrojejunal anastomosis in 366 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses. Obes Surg 14: 1067–1069CrossRefPubMed Shin RB (2004) Intraoperative endoscopic test resulting in no postoperative leaks from the gastric pouch and gastrojejunal anastomosis in 366 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses. Obes Surg 14: 1067–1069CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic evaluation of the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass
A series of 340 patients without postoperative leak
Authors
N. Sekhar
A. Torquati
R. Lutfi
W. O. Richards
Publication date
01-02-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0118-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2006 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Fade or fate