Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2006

01-10-2006

Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook

Authors: G. C. Roviaro, C. Vergani, F. Varoli, M. Francese, R. Caminiti, M. Maciocco

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mini-invasive techniques have revolutionized surgery, but the superiority of laparoscopic access for appendectomy is widely debated. The authors analyze their monocentric experience with 1,347 laparoscopic appendectomies.

Methods

Between October 1991 and December 2002, all the patients with an indication for appendectomy underwent surgery (301 emergency and 1,046 interval appendectomies) using the laparoscopic approach.

Results

For 1,248 patients, appendectomy was performed laparoscopically, whereas for 99 patients (7.3%), it was converted to an open procedure because of technical reasons (90 patients, 6.7%) or intraoperative complications (9 patients, 0.6%). For 59 patients (4.4%), the appendectomy was associated with another procedure. Histology showed “acute” alterations in 261 of the 301 emergency surgeries and in 148 of the 1,046 elective operations. Postoperative complications arose in 37 patients (2.7%), with 5 patients (0.3%) requiring invasive treatment. The mean postoperative stay was 30 h.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers unquestionable advantages, but it is not yet considered the “gold standard” for appendiceal pathology. Many centers reserve it for selected patients (e.g., obese patients and women suspected of having other pathologies). No randomized trials or metaanalyses have definitively proved its superiority.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson DG, Edelman DS (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: a single-institution study. JSLS 1(4):323–324PubMed Anderson DG, Edelman DS (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: a single-institution study. JSLS 1(4):323–324PubMed
2.
go back to reference Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Murphy PG (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501PubMed Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Murphy PG (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chevalier J, Durand A (1980) Reflexions sur une série homogène de 3,200 appendicectomies. Lyon Chir 76: 251–253 Chevalier J, Durand A (1980) Reflexions sur une série homogène de 3,200 appendicectomies. Lyon Chir 76: 251–253
4.
go back to reference Chung RS, Rowland DY, Le P, Diaz J (1999) A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 117: 250–256CrossRef Chung RS, Rowland DY, Le P, Diaz J (1999) A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 117: 250–256CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20: 263–266PubMedCrossRef Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20: 263–266PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Croce E, Olmi S, Azzola M, Russo R (1999) Laparoscopic appendectomy and minilaparoscopic approach: a retrospective review after eight years’ experience. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3: 285–292 Croce E, Olmi S, Azzola M, Russo R (1999) Laparoscopic appendectomy and minilaparoscopic approach: a retrospective review after eight years’ experience. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3: 285–292
7.
go back to reference European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (1995) The EAES Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Surg Endosc 9: 550–563 European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (1995) The EAES Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Surg Endosc 9: 550–563
8.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219: 725–731PubMed Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219: 725–731PubMed
9.
go back to reference Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Metaanalysis of controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9: 17–26PubMedCrossRef Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Metaanalysis of controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9: 17–26PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186: 545–553PubMedCrossRef Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186: 545–553PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C (1990) Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report of 338 operations. Surg Endosc 4: 6–9PubMedCrossRef Gotz F, Pier A, Bacher C (1990) Modified laparoscopic appendectomy in surgery: a report of 338 operations. Surg Endosc 4: 6–9PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239: 43–52PubMedCrossRef Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239: 43–52PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20: 17–21PubMedCrossRef Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg 20: 17–21PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plews A Sweenwy J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39: 457–462PubMed Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plews A Sweenwy J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B (1996) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg 39: 457–462PubMed
15.
go back to reference Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208PubMedCrossRef Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) Cost-effective appendectomy: open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 12: 1204–1208PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffnet H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 86: 48–53PubMedCrossRef Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, Enochsson L, Fenyo G, Graffnet H, Hallerback B, Johansson B, Anderberg B, Wenner J, Ringqvist I, Sorensen S (1999) Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 86: 48–53PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Henle KP, Beller S, Rechener J, Zerz A, Szinic G, Klinger A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurg 67: 526–530PubMed Henle KP, Beller S, Rechener J, Zerz A, Szinic G, Klinger A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurg 67: 526–530PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissel C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337PubMedCrossRef Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissel C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12: 940–943PubMedCrossRef Johnson AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12: 940–943PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kazemier G, De Zeew GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340PubMedCrossRef Kazemier G, De Zeew GR, Lange JF, Hop WCJ, Bonjer HJ (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 11: 336–340PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? Surg Endosc 11: 95–97PubMedCrossRef Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? Surg Endosc 11: 95–97PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel HH (1990) Sequelae of appendicectomy with special reference to intraabdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest 29: 241–245PubMedCrossRef Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel HH (1990) Sequelae of appendicectomy with special reference to intraabdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Invest 29: 241–245PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lorenz EP, Ehren G, Schmid M, Soop J, Konradt J (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy as standard procedure: technique and outcome in 409 patients. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 97–100PubMed Lorenz EP, Ehren G, Schmid M, Soop J, Konradt J (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy as standard procedure: technique and outcome in 409 patients. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4): 97–100PubMed
25.
go back to reference Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernandez E, Nieto B (1997) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 335–339PubMedCrossRef Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernandez E, Nieto B (1997) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 335–339PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 222: 256–262PubMed Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 222: 256–262PubMed
27.
go back to reference Maxwell JG, Robinson CL, Maxwell TG, Maxwell BG, Smith CR, Brinker C (2001) Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am J Surg 182: 687–692PubMedCrossRef Maxwell JG, Robinson CL, Maxwell TG, Maxwell BG, Smith CR, Brinker C (2001) Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Am J Surg 182: 687–692PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins TBS, Helton SW (1996) A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 171: 533–537PubMedCrossRef McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins TBS, Helton SW (1996) A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 171: 533–537PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference McCall JL, Sharpless K, Jadallah F (1997) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1045–1050PubMedCrossRef McCall JL, Sharpless K, Jadallah F (1997) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 84: 1045–1050PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Meynaud-Kraemer L, Colin C, Vergnon P, Barth X (1999) Wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 15: 380–391 Meynaud-Kraemer L, Colin C, Vergnon P, Barth X (1999) Wound infection in open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 15: 380–391
31.
go back to reference Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JC, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparascopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18: 242–245PubMedCrossRef Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JC, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI (2004) Open and laparascopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18: 242–245PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ortega AE, Hunter JC, Peters JH (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213PubMedCrossRef Ortega AE, Hunter JC, Peters JH (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Tanik A, Kale IT (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 187–189PubMedCrossRef Ozmen MM, Zulfikaroglu B, Tanik A, Kale IT (1999) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 9: 187–189PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E (1997) Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Br J Surg 84: 842–847PubMedCrossRef Reiertsen O, Larsen S, Trondsen E (1997) Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Br J Surg 84: 842–847PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery: still of interest? Surg Endosc 16: 1192–1196PubMedCrossRef Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery: still of interest? Surg Endosc 16: 1192–1196PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Halthausen U, Neugebaner EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383: 289–295PubMedCrossRef Sauerland S, Lefering R, Halthausen U, Neugebaner EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 383: 289–295PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbulh L (2000) A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg 180: 73–77PubMedCrossRef Schafer M, Lauper M, Krahenbulh L (2000) A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg 180: 73–77PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Schirmer BD, Schmierg RE, Dix J, Edge SB, Hanks JB (1993) Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 165: 670–675PubMedCrossRef Schirmer BD, Schmierg RE, Dix J, Edge SB, Hanks JB (1993) Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 165: 670–675PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Slim R, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparascopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 398–403PubMedCrossRef Slim R, Pezet D, Chipponi J (1998) Laparascopic or open appendectomy? Critical review of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 41: 398–403PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Tate JJT, Dawnson JW, Chung SCS, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342: 633–637PubMedCrossRef Tate JJT, Dawnson JW, Chung SCS, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 342: 633–637PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383PubMed Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A metaanalysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42: 377–383PubMed
43.
go back to reference Ure BM, Bax NM, Van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1170–1173PubMedCrossRef Ure BM, Bax NM, Van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1170–1173PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Valla JS, Limonne B, Valla V (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 166–172 Valla JS, Limonne B, Valla V (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 166–172
45.
go back to reference Valla JS, Ordorica Flores RM, Steyaert H, Merrot T, Barteles AM, Brean J, Ginier C, Cheli M (1999) Umbilical one-puncture laparascopic-assisted appendectomy. Surg Endosc 13: 83–85PubMedCrossRef Valla JS, Ordorica Flores RM, Steyaert H, Merrot T, Barteles AM, Brean J, Ginier C, Cheli M (1999) Umbilical one-puncture laparascopic-assisted appendectomy. Surg Endosc 13: 83–85PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Valla JS, Steyaert H (1999) Laparoscopic appendicectomy in children in endoscopic surgery. Spinger Verlag, Berlin, New York pp 234–253 Valla JS, Steyaert H (1999) Laparoscopic appendicectomy in children in endoscopic surgery. Spinger Verlag, Berlin, New York pp 234–253
Metadata
Title
Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook
Authors
G. C. Roviaro
C. Vergani
F. Varoli
M. Francese
R. Caminiti
M. Maciocco
Publication date
01-10-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2006
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0021-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2006

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2006 Go to the issue