Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2005

01-04-2005 | Original article

Laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a single-institution retrospective study evaluating surgical outcome

Authors: D. Lechaux, G. Trebuchet, L. Siproudhis, J. P. Campion

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The laparoscopic approach promises to become the gold standard for the transabdominal management of full-thickness rectal prolapse. The aim of this study was to review our experience and to highlight the functional results achieved with this new technique.

Methods

Forty-eight patients with full-thickness external prolapse underwent laparoscopic repair between February 1997 and February 2003. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation of their rectal function. Patients with isolated rectal ulcer without prolapse or with internal prolapse and patients deemed by the anesthesiologist to be unfit for general anesthesia were excluded from the study. The laparoscopic technique was either a mesh rectopexy without resection (n = 35) or a suture rectopexy with sigmoid resection (n = 13). Patients with intractable constipation preceding the development of the rectal prolapse were advised to have a resection–rectopexy. In the postoperative follow-up, attention was paid to mortality, morbidity, recurrent prolapse, incontinence, and constipation. Follow-up was done by clinical review and postal questionnaire.

Results

There were no deaths and no septic or anastomotic complications. The postoperative morbidity rate was 5%. Oral intake was started on postoperative day 1. Discharge from the hospital was on postoperative day 4 in patients without sigmoid resection and on postoperative day 7 in patients with sigmoid resection. Two patients (4%) developed recurrent total prolapse during a median follow-up period of 36 ± 15 months (range, 7–77). The functional results were good or excellent in 72% of the cases, without digitations or dyschesia. Continence was improved in 31% of the patients and remains unchanged in 64% of them. In 11 patients (23%), constipation was worsened by the procedure.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic rectopexy with or without resection is both safe and effective. Advantages include low-morbidity, improved cosmesis, the rapid return of intestinal function, early discharge from hospital, and a low recurrence rate. The fecal continence score is improved; however, constipation is frequently worsened.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benoist, S, Taffinder, N, Gould, S, Chang, A, Darzi, A 2001Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexyAm J Surg182168173PubMed Benoist, S, Taffinder, N, Gould, S, Chang, A, Darzi, A 2001Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexyAm J Surg182168173PubMed
2.
go back to reference Berman, IR 1992Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implicationsDis Colon Rectum35689693PubMed Berman, IR 1992Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implicationsDis Colon Rectum35689693PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bruch, HP, Herold, A, Schiedeck, T, Schwandner, O 1999Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstructionDis Colon Rectum4211891194PubMed Bruch, HP, Herold, A, Schiedeck, T, Schwandner, O 1999Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstructionDis Colon Rectum4211891194PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cuschieri, A, Shimi, SM, Vander Velpen, G, Banting, S, Wood, RA 1994Laparoscopic prosthesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapseBr J Surg81138139PubMed Cuschieri, A, Shimi, SM, Vander Velpen, G, Banting, S, Wood, RA 1994Laparoscopic prosthesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapseBr J Surg81138139PubMed
5.
go back to reference Darzi, A, Henry, MM, Guillou, PJ, Shorvon, P, Monson, JR 1995Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapseSurg Endosc9301303PubMed Darzi, A, Henry, MM, Guillou, PJ, Shorvon, P, Monson, JR 1995Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapseSurg Endosc9301303PubMed
6.
go back to reference Douard, R, Frileux, P, Brunel, M, Attal, E, Tiret, E, Parc, R 2003Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapseDis Colon Rectum4610891096CrossRefPubMed Douard, R, Frileux, P, Brunel, M, Attal, E, Tiret, E, Parc, R 2003Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapseDis Colon Rectum4610891096CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Drossman, DA, Sandler, RS, McKee, DC, Lovitz, AJ 1982Bowel patterns among subjects not seeking health care: use of a questionnaire to identify a population with bowel dysfunctionGastroenterology83529534PubMed Drossman, DA, Sandler, RS, McKee, DC, Lovitz, AJ 1982Bowel patterns among subjects not seeking health care: use of a questionnaire to identify a population with bowel dysfunctionGastroenterology83529534PubMed
8.
go back to reference Frykman, HM, Goldberg, SM 1969The surgical treatment of rectal procidentiaSurg Gynecol Obstet12912251230PubMed Frykman, HM, Goldberg, SM 1969The surgical treatment of rectal procidentiaSurg Gynecol Obstet12912251230PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jorge, JM, Wexner, SD 1993Etiology and management of fecal incontinenceDis Colon Rectum367797PubMed Jorge, JM, Wexner, SD 1993Etiology and management of fecal incontinenceDis Colon Rectum367797PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kellokumpu, IH, Vironen, J, Scheinin, T 2000Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel functionSurg Endosc14634640PubMed Kellokumpu, IH, Vironen, J, Scheinin, T 2000Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel functionSurg Endosc14634640PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lechaux, JP, Atienza, P, Goasguen, N, Lechaux, D, Bars, I 2001Prosthetic rectopexy to the pelvic floor and sigmoidectomy for rectal prolapseAm J Surg182465469CrossRefPubMed Lechaux, JP, Atienza, P, Goasguen, N, Lechaux, D, Bars, I 2001Prosthetic rectopexy to the pelvic floor and sigmoidectomy for rectal prolapseAm J Surg182465469CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Loygue, J, Nordlinger, B, Cunci, O, Malafosse, M, Huguet, C, Parc, R 1984Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse: report of 257 casesDis Colon Rectum27356359PubMed Loygue, J, Nordlinger, B, Cunci, O, Malafosse, M, Huguet, C, Parc, R 1984Rectopexy to the promontory for the treatment of rectal prolapse: report of 257 casesDis Colon Rectum27356359PubMed
13.
go back to reference Madoff, RD, Williams, JG, Wong, WD, Rothenberger, DA, Goldberg, SM 1992Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapseAm J Gastroenterol87101104PubMed Madoff, RD, Williams, JG, Wong, WD, Rothenberger, DA, Goldberg, SM 1992Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapseAm J Gastroenterol87101104PubMed
14.
go back to reference Milsom, JW, Bohm, B, Hammerhofer, KA, Fazio, V, Steiger, E, Elson, P 1998A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary reportJ Am Coll Surg1874654PubMed Milsom, JW, Bohm, B, Hammerhofer, KA, Fazio, V, Steiger, E, Elson, P 1998A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary reportJ Am Coll Surg1874654PubMed
15.
go back to reference Schlinkert, RT, Beart, RW,Jr, Wolff, BG, Pemberton, JH 1985Anterior resection for complete rectal prolapseDis Colon Rectum28409412PubMed Schlinkert, RT, Beart, RW,Jr, Wolff, BG, Pemberton, JH 1985Anterior resection for complete rectal prolapseDis Colon Rectum28409412PubMed
16.
go back to reference Solomon, MJ, Young, CJ, Eyers, AA, Roberts, RA 2002Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapseBr J Surg893539PubMed Solomon, MJ, Young, CJ, Eyers, AA, Roberts, RA 2002Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapseBr J Surg893539PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a single-institution retrospective study evaluating surgical outcome
Authors
D. Lechaux
G. Trebuchet
L. Siproudhis
J. P. Campion
Publication date
01-04-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9088-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2005 Go to the issue