Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2005

01-03-2005 | Original article

Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy

Authors: D. E. Moore, T. Speroff, E. Grogan, B. Poulose, M. D. Holzman

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite multiple studies comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomies, the clinically and economically superior procedure still is in question. A cost analysis was performed using both institutional and societal perspectives.

Methods

A decision analytic model was developed to evaluate laparoscopic and open appendectomies. The institutional perspective addressed direct health care costs, whereas the societal perspective addressed direct and indirect health care costs. Baseline values and ranges were taken from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and Medicare databases.

Results

From the institutional perspective, open appendectomy is the least expensive strategy, with an expected cost of $5,171, as compared with $6,118 for laparoscopic appendectomy. The laparoscopic approach is less expensive if open appendectomy wound infection rates exceed 23%. From the societal perspective, laparoscopic appendectomy is the least expensive strategy, with an expected cost of $10,400, as compared with $12,055 for open appendectomy.

Conclusions

The decision analysis demonstrated an economic advantage to the hospital of open appendectomy. In contrast, laparoscopic appendectomy represents a better economic choice for the patient.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Chung, RS, Rowland, DY, Li, P, Diaz, J 1999A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomyAm J Surg177250225CrossRefPubMed Chung, RS, Rowland, DY, Li, P, Diaz, J 1999A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomyAm J Surg177250225CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Golub, R, Siddiqui, F, Pohl, D 1998Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysisJ Am Coll Surg186545553CrossRefPubMed Golub, R, Siddiqui, F, Pohl, D 1998Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysisJ Am Coll Surg186545553CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hart, R, Rajgopal, C, Plewes, A, Sweeney, J, Davies, W, Gray, D, Taylor, B 1996Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patientsCan J Surg39457462PubMed Hart, R, Rajgopal, C, Plewes, A, Sweeney, J, Davies, W, Gray, D, Taylor, B 1996Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patientsCan J Surg39457462PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hebebrand, D, Troidl, H, Spangenberger, W, Neugebauer, E, Schwalm, T, Gunther, MW 1994Laparoscopic or classical appendectomy? A prospective randomized studyChirurg65112120PubMed Hebebrand, D, Troidl, H, Spangenberger, W, Neugebauer, E, Schwalm, T, Gunther, MW 1994Laparoscopic or classical appendectomy? A prospective randomized studyChirurg65112120PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kazemier, G, Zeeuw, GR, Lange, JF, Hop, WC, Bonjer, HJ 1997Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trialSurg Endosc11336340CrossRefPubMed Kazemier, G, Zeeuw, GR, Lange, JF, Hop, WC, Bonjer, HJ 1997Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: a randomized clinical trialSurg Endosc11336340CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kum, CK, Ngoi, SS, Goh, PM, Tekant, Y, Isaac, JR 1993Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomyBr J Surg8015991600PubMed Kum, CK, Ngoi, SS, Goh, PM, Tekant, Y, Isaac, JR 1993Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomyBr J Surg8015991600PubMed
8.
go back to reference Laine, S, Rantala, A, Gullichsen, R, Ovaska, J 1997Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young womenSurg Endosc119597CrossRefPubMed Laine, S, Rantala, A, Gullichsen, R, Ovaska, J 1997Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young womenSurg Endosc119597CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Long, KH, Bannon, MP, Zietlow, SP, Helgeson, ER, Harmsen, WS, Smith, CD, Ilstrup, DM, Baerga-Varela, Y, Sarr, MG 2001A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analysesSurgery129390400CrossRefPubMed Long, KH, Bannon, MP, Zietlow, SP, Helgeson, ER, Harmsen, WS, Smith, CD, Ilstrup, DM, Baerga-Varela, Y, Sarr, MG 2001A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analysesSurgery129390400CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McBurney, C 1894The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of OperatingAnn Surg2038 McBurney, C 1894The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of OperatingAnn Surg2038
11.
go back to reference Messick, CR, Mamdani, M, McNichol, IR, Danziger, LH, Rodvold, KA, Condon, RE, Walker, AP, Edmiston, CE,Jr 1998Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ampicillin-sulbactam versus cefoxitin in the treatment of intraabdominal infectionsPharmacotherapy18175183PubMed Messick, CR, Mamdani, M, McNichol, IR, Danziger, LH, Rodvold, KA, Condon, RE, Walker, AP, Edmiston, CE,Jr 1998Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ampicillin-sulbactam versus cefoxitin in the treatment of intraabdominal infectionsPharmacotherapy18175183PubMed
12.
go back to reference Minne, L, Varner, D, Burnell, A, Ratzer, E, Clark, J, Haun, W 1997Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy:prospective randomized study of outcomesArch Surg132708711PubMed Minne, L, Varner, D, Burnell, A, Ratzer, E, Clark, J, Haun, W 1997Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy:prospective randomized study of outcomesArch Surg132708711PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ortega, AE, Hunter, JG, Peters, JH, Swanstrom, LL, Schirmer, BA 1995Prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study GroupAm J Surg169208212CrossRefPubMed Ortega, AE, Hunter, JG, Peters, JH, Swanstrom, LL, Schirmer, BA 1995Prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study GroupAm J Surg169208212CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pedersen, AG, Petersen, OB, Wara, P, Ronning, H, Qvist, N, Laurberg, S 2001Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomyBr J Surg88200205CrossRefPubMed Pedersen, AG, Petersen, OB, Wara, P, Ronning, H, Qvist, N, Laurberg, S 2001Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomyBr J Surg88200205CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tate, JJ, Dawson, JW, Chung, SC, Lau, WY, Li, AK 1993Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trialLancet342633637CrossRefPubMed Tate, JJ, Dawson, JW, Chung, SC, Lau, WY, Li, AK 1993Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trialLancet342633637CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Williams, MD, Collins, JN, Wright, TF, Fenoglio, ME 1996Laparoscopic versus open appendectomySouth Med J89668674PubMed Williams, MD, Collins, JN, Wright, TF, Fenoglio, ME 1996Laparoscopic versus open appendectomySouth Med J89668674PubMed
17.
go back to reference Litynski, GS 1998Kurt Semm and the fight against skepticism: endoscopic hemostasis, Laparascopic appendectomy, and Semm’s impact on the Laparascopic Revolution.JSLS2309313PubMed Litynski, GS 1998Kurt Semm and the fight against skepticism: endoscopic hemostasis, Laparascopic appendectomy, and Semm’s impact on the Laparascopic Revolution.JSLS2309313PubMed
Metadata
Title
Cost perspectives of laparoscopic and open appendectomy
Authors
D. E. Moore
T. Speroff
E. Grogan
B. Poulose
M. D. Holzman
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8724-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2005 Go to the issue