Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2005

01-10-2005 | Original article

Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators

Authors: B. Zheng, F. Verjee, A. Lomax, C. L. MacKenzie

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the performance of complex laparoscopic tasks, one question is whether the task should be distributed between two operators or accomplished bimanually by one operator. The authors hypothesized that superior task performance results when two operators work collaboratively in a dyad team as opposed to one operator performing the task bimanually. Furthermore, in a visually misaligned condition, the performance of a team will be more robust than that of a single operator working alone.

Methods

The suture-cutting task was performed by 24 right-handed subjects in a mock surgical setup using a laparoscopic grasper and a pair of laparoscopic scissors. The cutting task was performed by 8 subjects bimanually (using both limbs) and 16 paired subjects unimanually (using their preferred limbs). The image of the work plane was displayed either vertically or superimposed over the work plane. In half of the conditions, the camera was rotated 45°, causing misalignment between the actual and displayed work planes. Movements were videotaped. Important movement events were identified and used to subdivide the task into subtasks. Durations of the subtasks and attempts for grasping and cutting were analyzed using a mixed-design multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).

Results

For a number of subtasks, the dyad group showed shorter durations than the bimanual group. The 45° rotation of the camera degraded both bimanual and dyad performance, resulting in prolonged movement times for all subtasks. The learning process was facilitated by the superimposed display in that grasper and scissor reaching times improved over trials, as compared with the vertical display.

Conclusion

The results indicate the superior role of team collaboration, as compared with the single operator, in a complex remote manipulation such as a laparoscopic cutting task. This enhanced task performance is achieved because of the larger capacity for information processing. These results may have some relevance for optimizing performance of endoscopic surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Kurmmel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg, 189: 349–355CrossRefPubMed Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Kurmmel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg, 189: 349–355CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bowers CA, Braun CC, Morgan BB (1997) Team workload: its meaning and measurement. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds). Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ pp 85–108 Bowers CA, Braun CC, Morgan BB (1997) Team workload: its meaning and measurement. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds). Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ pp 85–108
3.
go back to reference Breedveld P, Wentink M (2001) Eye–hand coordination in laparoscopy: an overview of experiments and supporting aids. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10: 155–162CrossRef Breedveld P, Wentink M (2001) Eye–hand coordination in laparoscopy: an overview of experiments and supporting aids. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10: 155–162CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cao CGL, MacKenzie CL, Ibbotson JA, Turner LJ, Blair NP, Nagy AG (1999) Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic procedures. In: Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D (eds.) Medicine meets virtual reality 7: the convergence of physical and informational technologies: options for a new era in healthcare. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 83–89 Cao CGL, MacKenzie CL, Ibbotson JA, Turner LJ, Blair NP, Nagy AG (1999) Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic procedures. In: Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D (eds.) Medicine meets virtual reality 7: the convergence of physical and informational technologies: options for a new era in healthcare. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 83–89
5.
go back to reference Carter AJ, West MA (1999) Sharing the burden: teamwork in health care settings. In: Firth-Cozens J, Payne RL (eds) Stress in health professional. John Wiley, Chichester, England pp 191–202 Carter AJ, West MA (1999) Sharing the burden: teamwork in health care settings. In: Firth-Cozens J, Payne RL (eds) Stress in health professional. John Wiley, Chichester, England pp 191–202
6.
go back to reference Cresswell AB, Macmillan AIM, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1999) Methods for improving performance under reverse alignment conditions during endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 591–594CrossRefPubMed Cresswell AB, Macmillan AIM, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1999) Methods for improving performance under reverse alignment conditions during endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13: 591–594CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, (1995) Visual displays and visual perception in minimal access surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 2: 209–214PubMed Cuschieri A, (1995) Visual displays and visual perception in minimal access surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 2: 209–214PubMed
8.
go back to reference Gallagher AC, McClure N, McGuigan J (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the “fulcrum effect” in endoscopic skill acquisition. Endoscopy 30: 617–620PubMed Gallagher AC, McClure N, McGuigan J (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the “fulcrum effect” in endoscopic skill acquisition. Endoscopy 30: 617–620PubMed
9.
go back to reference Guiard Y, (1987) Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav 19: 486–517PubMed Guiard Y, (1987) Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav 19: 486–517PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997). Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 84: 1406–1464 Hanna GB, Shimi S, Cuschieri A (1997). Influence of direction of view, target-to-endoscope distance and manipulation angle on endoscopic knot tying. Br J Surg 84: 1406–1464
11.
go back to reference Janmohamed Z, Zheng B, MacKenzie CL (2003) Aiming with the hand touching the target: the role of proprioceptive information between hands. Proceedings of the 34th Association of Canadian Ergonomists Annual Conference, October 15, 2003, London, Ontario Janmohamed Z, Zheng B, MacKenzie CL (2003) Aiming with the hand touching the target: the role of proprioceptive information between hands. Proceedings of the 34th Association of Canadian Ergonomists Annual Conference, October 15, 2003, London, Ontario
12.
go back to reference Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5: 229 –238CrossRefPubMed Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5: 229 –238CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1987) Hand movement: a window into haptic object recognition. Cognit Psychol. 19: 342–368CrossRefPubMed Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (1987) Hand movement: a window into haptic object recognition. Cognit Psychol. 19: 342–368CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference MacKenzie C, Iberall T (1994) The grasping hand. North-Holland, Amsterdam MacKenzie C, Iberall T (1994) The grasping hand. North-Holland, Amsterdam
15.
go back to reference Mandryk RL, MacKenzie CL (1999) Superimposing display space on workspace in the context of endoscopic surgery. CHI Companion, CHI ′99. ACM Press, New York pp. 284–285 Mandryk RL, MacKenzie CL (1999) Superimposing display space on workspace in the context of endoscopic surgery. CHI Companion, CHI ′99. ACM Press, New York pp. 284–285
16.
go back to reference Morgan BB Jr, Salas E, Glickman AS (1994) An analysis of team evolution and maturation. J Gen Psychol, 120: 277–291 Morgan BB Jr, Salas E, Glickman AS (1994) An analysis of team evolution and maturation. J Gen Psychol, 120: 277–291
17.
go back to reference Norman DA, Bobrow DG (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognit Psychol 7: 44–64CrossRef Norman DA, Bobrow DG (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognit Psychol 7: 44–64CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pashler H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple task: data and theory. Psychol Bull 116: 220–224CrossRefPubMed Pashler H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple task: data and theory. Psychol Bull 116: 220–224CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tendick F, Jennings RW, Tharp G, Stark L (1993). Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: experiment, analysis, and observation. Presence 2: 66–81 Tendick F, Jennings RW, Tharp G, Stark L (1993). Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: experiment, analysis, and observation. Presence 2: 66–81
20.
go back to reference Wiesendanger M, Kanzennikov O, Perrig S, Kaluzny P (1996) Two hands, one action. In: Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan JR (eds) Hand and brain. Academic Press, San Diago CA pp 283–300 Wiesendanger M, Kanzennikov O, Perrig S, Kaluzny P (1996) Two hands, one action. In: Wing AM, Haggard P, Flanagan JR (eds) Hand and brain. Academic Press, San Diago CA pp 283–300
21.
go back to reference Zheng B, Janmohamed Z, MacKenzie CL (2003) Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 17: 1475–1480CrossRefPubMed Zheng B, Janmohamed Z, MacKenzie CL (2003) Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 17: 1475–1480CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Video analysis of endoscopic cutting task performed by one versus two operators
Authors
B. Zheng
F. Verjee
A. Lomax
C. L. MacKenzie
Publication date
01-10-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8209-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2005 Go to the issue