Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2005

01-08-2005 | Original article

The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees

Testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills

Authors: J. A. Windsor, F. Zoha

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

It has been suggested that virtual reality (VR) might be useful for the selection of surgical trainees and the measurement of technical performance during preoperative training and retraining. This study was designed to determine whether it is possible to define and measure the acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills in novice surgical trainees.

Methods

Novice surgical trainees (NSTs n = 10, junior surgical registrars with little or no prior experience with laparoscopic surgery) were tested and retested after 1 month using the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer–Virtual Reality. Two tasks were used: the simple task [stretch diathermy (SD)] and the more complex task [manipulation diathermy (MD)]. The score was derived from the time taken to complete the task and the number of errors that occurred. Acquisition is the difference between the first and last score of the first training session, loss is the difference in score that occurs between the last score of the first training session and the first score of the second training session, and reacquisition is the difference in the first and last scores of the second training session. A performance criterion level was defined for each task by testing a group of experienced laparoscopic surgeons (n = 10). Groups were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, with p < 0.05 considered to be significant.

Results

Acquisition of skill was found for five of 10 NSTs with the SD task and 10/10 for the MD task. As a group the NSTs achieved the criterion level from the outset with the SD task and exceeded it by the eighth attempt for the MD task. The best score was achieved with fewer attempts during the second training session for the SD but not the MD task. The defined parameters are expressed as mean percentage score ± SD for the 10 NSTs and for each task. There was a 36% (±26) acquisition for the SD task compared with 50% ( ± 4) for the MD task (Wilcoxon p = 0.241). There was a 23% (±19) loss for the SD task compared with 81% (±16) for the MD task (p < 0.005). There was a 20% (±10) reacquisition for the SD task compared with 54% (± 7) for the MD task (p < 0.005). The mean scores were greater for the more complex task (MD), which was more useful in discriminating between the individual trainees and the two training sessions.

Conclusions

It is possible to use VR to define the acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills in individual NSTs and to compare them with a predefined performance criterion level. This study defines parameters that will be useful in repeated training sessions of NSTs in the preoperative phase of training and during retraining.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gallagher, AG, Lederman, AB, McGlade, K, Satava, RM, Smith, CD 2004Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performanceSurg Endosco18660665CrossRef Gallagher, AG, Lederman, AB, McGlade, K, Satava, RM, Smith, CD 2004Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performanceSurg Endosco18660665CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gallagher, AG, McClure, N, McGuigan, J, Crothers, J, Browning, J 1999Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive Surgical Trainer Virtual Realtity (MIST-VR)Endoscopy31310313CrossRefPubMed Gallagher, AG, McClure, N, McGuigan, J, Crothers, J, Browning, J 1999Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive Surgical Trainer Virtual Realtity (MIST-VR)Endoscopy31310313CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gallagher, AG, Richie, K, McClure, N, McGuigan, J 2001Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual realityWorld J Surg2514781483CrossRefPubMed Gallagher, AG, Richie, K, McClure, N, McGuigan, J 2001Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual realityWorld J Surg2514781483CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gallagher, AG, Satava, RM 2002Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measuresSurg Endosc1617461752CrossRefPubMed Gallagher, AG, Satava, RM 2002Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measuresSurg Endosc1617461752CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Grantcharov, TP, Kristiansen, VB, Bendix, J, Bardram, L, Rosenberg, J, Funch-Jensen, P 2004Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills trainingBr J Surg91146150CrossRefPubMed Grantcharov, TP, Kristiansen, VB, Bendix, J, Bardram, L, Rosenberg, J, Funch-Jensen, P 2004Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills trainingBr J Surg91146150CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jordan, JA, Gallagher, AG, McGuigan, J, McGlade, K, McClure, N 2000A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skills acquisitionAm J Surg180208211CrossRefPubMed Jordan, JA, Gallagher, AG, McGuigan, J, McGlade, K, McClure, N 2000A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skills acquisitionAm J Surg180208211CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jordan, JA, Gallagher, AG, McGuigan, J, McClure, N 2001Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeonsSurg Endosc1510801084CrossRefPubMed Jordan, JA, Gallagher, AG, McGuigan, J, McClure, N 2001Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeonsSurg Endosc1510801084CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McNatt, SS, Smith, CD 2001A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeonsSurg Endosc1510851089CrossRefPubMed McNatt, SS, Smith, CD 2001A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeonsSurg Endosc1510851089CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Seymour, NE, Gallagher, AG, Roman, SA, O’Brien, MK, Bansal, VK, Anderson, DK, et al. 2002Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized double-blinded studyAnn Surg236458463CrossRefPubMed Seymour, NE, Gallagher, AG, Roman, SA, O’Brien, MK, Bansal, VK, Anderson, DK,  et al. 2002Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized double-blinded studyAnn Surg236458463CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Torkington, J, Smith, SG, Rees, BI, Darzi, A 2001Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic taskSurg Endosc1510761079CrossRefPubMed Torkington, J, Smith, SG, Rees, BI, Darzi, A 2001Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic taskSurg Endosc1510761079CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees
Testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills
Authors
J. A. Windsor
F. Zoha
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2200-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2005

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2005 Go to the issue