Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 1/2022

Open Access 01-02-2022 | Dysphagia | Original Article

Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index

Authors: Renée Speyer, Reinie Cordier, Clara Bouix, Yohan Gallois, Virginie Woisard

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The Deglutition Handicap Index (DHI) is a self-report measure for patients at risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia on deglutition-related aspects of functional health status (FHS) and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). The DHI consists of 30 items which are subsumed within the Symptom, Functional and Emotional subscales. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the DHI using Classic Test Theory according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. A total of 453 patients with dysphagia with different aetiologies were recruited concurrently at two academic hospitals. Dysphagia was confirmed by fiberoptic endoscopic and/or videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing. In addition, a healthy control group of 132 participants were recruited. Structural validity was determined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and internal consistency by calculating Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Hypothesis testing was evaluated using Mann–Whitney U-tests, linear regression analysis and correlations analysis. Diagnostic performance and receiver operating characteristic curves analysis were calculated. Factor analyses indicated that the DHI is a unidimensional measure. The DHI has good internal consistency with some indication of item redundancy, weak to moderate structural validity and strong hypothesis testing for construct validity. The DHI shows high diagnostic performance as part of criterion validity. These findings support that the DHI is an appropriate choice as a patient self-report measure to evaluate FHS and HR-QoL in dysphagia. Ongoing validation to assess the measure for possible item redundancy and to examine the dimensionality of the DHI using item response theory is recommended.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Speyer R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 2013;46(6):989–1008.CrossRef Speyer R. Oropharyngeal dysphagia: screening and assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 2013;46(6):989–1008.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Baijens LWJ, et al. ESSD-EUGMS white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1403–28.CrossRef Baijens LWJ, et al. ESSD-EUGMS white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1403–28.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Timmerman AA, et al. Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2014;29(2):183–98.CrossRef Timmerman AA, et al. Psychometric characteristics of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2014;29(2):183–98.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ferrans CE, et al. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh . 2005;37(4):336–42.CrossRef Ferrans CE, et al. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh . 2005;37(4):336–42.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol . 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRef Mokkink LB, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol . 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res . 2018;27(5):1171–9.CrossRef Mokkink LB, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res . 2018;27(5):1171–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Terwee CB, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res . 2018;27(5):1159–70.CrossRef Terwee CB, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res . 2018;27(5):1159–70.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res . 2018;27(5):1147–57.CrossRef Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res . 2018;27(5):1147–57.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Woisard V, Andrieux MP, Puech M. Validation of a self-assessment questionnaire for swallowing disorders (Deglutition Handicap Index). Revue de Laryngol Otol Rhinol . 2006;127(5):315–25. Woisard V, Andrieux MP, Puech M. Validation of a self-assessment questionnaire for swallowing disorders (Deglutition Handicap Index). Revue de Laryngol Otol Rhinol . 2006;127(5):315–25.
11.
go back to reference Speyer R, et al. Quality of life in oncological patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index. Dysphagia. 2011;26(4):407–14.CrossRef Speyer R, et al. Quality of life in oncological patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index. Dysphagia. 2011;26(4):407–14.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Woisard V, Lepage B. The “Deglutition Handicap Index” a self-administrated dysphagia-specific quality of life questionnaire: temporal reliability. Revue de Laryngol Otol Rhinol . 2010;131(1):19–22. Woisard V, Lepage B. The “Deglutition Handicap Index” a self-administrated dysphagia-specific quality of life questionnaire: temporal reliability. Revue de Laryngol Otol Rhinol . 2010;131(1):19–22.
13.
go back to reference Crestani S, Moerman M, Woisard V. The “Deglutition Handicap Index” a self-adminitrated dysphagia-specific quality of life questionnaire: sensibility to change. Revue De Laryngol Otol Rhinol . 2011;132:3–7. Crestani S, Moerman M, Woisard V. The “Deglutition Handicap Index” a self-adminitrated dysphagia-specific quality of life questionnaire: sensibility to change. Revue De Laryngol Otol Rhinol . 2011;132:3–7.
14.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
15.
go back to reference Swan K, et al. Psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of videofluoroscopic and fibre-endoscopic evaluations of swallowing: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2019;34(1):2–33.CrossRef Swan K, et al. Psychometric properties of visuoperceptual measures of videofluoroscopic and fibre-endoscopic evaluations of swallowing: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2019;34(1):2–33.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bouter LM, Zielhuis GA, Zeegers MPA. Diagnostic and prognostic research. Textbook of epidemiology. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2007. p. 171–201. Bouter LM, Zielhuis GA, Zeegers MPA. Diagnostic and prognostic research. Textbook of epidemiology. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2007. p. 171–201.
17.
go back to reference Terwee CB, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.CrossRef Terwee CB, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sarstedt M, Mooi E. A concise guide to market research: the process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 346. Sarstedt M, Mooi E. A concise guide to market research: the process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS Statistics. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 346.
21.
go back to reference Hair JF, et al. Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning EMEA: Andover; 2018. p. 832. Hair JF, et al. Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning EMEA: Andover; 2018. p. 832.
22.
go back to reference Field A. Exploratory factor analysis. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018. p. 777–833. Field A. Exploratory factor analysis. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018. p. 777–833.
23.
go back to reference Vatcheva KP, et al. Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2016;6(2):20.CrossRef Vatcheva KP, et al. Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2016;6(2):20.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge; 1988. p. 567. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge; 1988. p. 567.
25.
go back to reference Indrayan A. Medical biostatistics. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013. p. 1024. Indrayan A. Medical biostatistics. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013. p. 1024.
26.
go back to reference Cordier R, et al. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) using Rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):250–60.CrossRef Cordier R, et al. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) using Rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2017;32(2):250–60.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kean J, et al. An introduction to item response theory and Rasch analysis: Application using the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Brain Impair . 2018;19(1):91–102.CrossRef Kean J, et al. An introduction to item response theory and Rasch analysis: Application using the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Brain Impair . 2018;19(1):91–102.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wilmskoetter J, et al. Construct validity of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Disabil Rehabil . 2019;41(5):549–59.CrossRef Wilmskoetter J, et al. Construct validity of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Disabil Rehabil . 2019;41(5):549–59.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Belafsky PC, et al. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 2008;117(12):919–24.CrossRef Belafsky PC, et al. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol . 2008;117(12):919–24.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference McHorney CA, et al. The SWAL–QOL and SWAL–CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97–114.CrossRef McHorney CA, et al. The SWAL–QOL and SWAL–CARE outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: III. Documentation of reliability and validity. Dysphagia. 2002;17(2):97–114.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Linacre J. A user’s guide to Winsteps Rasch-model computer programs: program manual 3.92.0. Chicago: Mesa-Press II; 2016. Linacre J. A user’s guide to Winsteps Rasch-model computer programs: program manual 3.92.0. Chicago: Mesa-Press II; 2016.
33.
go back to reference Cordier R, et al. Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire: an item response theory approach. Dysphagia. 2018;33(4):441–56.CrossRef Cordier R, et al. Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire: an item response theory approach. Dysphagia. 2018;33(4):441–56.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hansen T, Kjaersgaard A. Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):139–139.CrossRef Hansen T, Kjaersgaard A. Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):139–139.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res . 2007;16(Suppl 1):5–18.CrossRef Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res . 2007;16(Suppl 1):5–18.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index
Authors
Renée Speyer
Reinie Cordier
Clara Bouix
Yohan Gallois
Virginie Woisard
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10250-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Dysphagia 1/2022 Go to the issue