Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Original Article

High-Volume Billing and Reimbursement Trends for Endoscopic Swallowing Studies in the Medicare Population

Authors: David A. Kasle, Sina J. Torabi, Emily L. Savoca, Michael Lerner, R. Peter Manes

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to delineate the reimbursement trends in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) and without sensory testing (FEES) in relation to that of speech-language pathology’s (SLP) portion of modified barium swallow studies (MBS), as well as to document the types of providers billing for these procedures. We performed descriptive analyses of the volume of FEES/FEESST and MBS, and total reimbursements data obtained from 2013–2018 Medicare Part B National Summary files. We also utilized the 2017 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data to analyze the higher volume providers (> 10 procedures annually) of either FEES and/or FEESST. From 2003 to 2018, there has been an average, annual increase of approximately 318 FEES/FEESST performed within the Medicare fee-for-service population (R = 0.9505 [95% CI 0.860–0.983]; p < 0.001) covered under Part B (which is largely outpatient coverage). Similarly, there was an increase in Medicare-specific FEES/FEESST reimbursement from $302,840 in 2003 to $1.2 million in 2018 (R = 0.9721 [95% CI 0.920–0.990; p < 0.001]). Prior to 2010, FEESST was performed more frequently than FEES (maximum annual difference of 1174), though from 2010 onward, relatively more annual FEES was performed. From 2003–2018, the reimbursement per procedure increased by $16.79 and $35.36 for FEESST and FEES, respectively, and by $32.84 for the SLP portion of the MBS. Among high-volume FEES/FEESST billers, 65.4% were otolaryngologists and 32.3% were independently billing SLPs. From 2003 to 2018, there has been a significant rise in the number of performed and reimbursed FEES/FEESST. From 2014 onward, compared to SLP-involved MBS, there has been a relative increase in performance of FEES/FEESST.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2(4):216–9.CrossRef Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2(4):216–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Langmore SE. History of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Evaluation and Management of Pharyngeal Dysphagia: Changes over the Years. Dysphagia. 2017;32:27–38.CrossRef Langmore SE. History of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Evaluation and Management of Pharyngeal Dysphagia: Changes over the Years. Dysphagia. 2017;32:27–38.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Leal-Leaño LR, Leon-Basantes GA, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2002–10.CrossRef Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Leal-Leaño LR, Leon-Basantes GA, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2002–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fattori B, Giusti P, Mancini V, et al. Comparison between videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopy and scintigraphy for diagnosis of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia Confronto tra videofluoroscopia, endoscopia a fibre ottiche e scintigrafia per la diagnosi di disfagia oro-faringea. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016;36(5):395–402.CrossRef Fattori B, Giusti P, Mancini V, et al. Comparison between videofluoroscopy, fiberoptic endoscopy and scintigraphy for diagnosis of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia Confronto tra videofluoroscopia, endoscopia a fibre ottiche e scintigrafia per la diagnosi di disfagia oro-faringea. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016;36(5):395–402.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Aviv JE, Kim T, Thomson JE, Sunshine S, Kaplan S, Close LG. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) in healthy controls. Dysphagia. 1998;13(2):87–92.CrossRef Aviv JE, Kim T, Thomson JE, Sunshine S, Kaplan S, Close LG. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) in healthy controls. Dysphagia. 1998;13(2):87–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim T, Goodhart K, Aviv JE, Sacco RL, Diamond B, Kaplan S, Close LG. FEESST: A New Bedside Endoscopic Test of the Motor and Sensory Components of Swallowing. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 1998;107(5):378–87.CrossRef Kim T, Goodhart K, Aviv JE, Sacco RL, Diamond B, Kaplan S, Close LG. FEESST: A New Bedside Endoscopic Test of the Motor and Sensory Components of Swallowing. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 1998;107(5):378–87.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kaneoka A, Krisciunas GP, Walsh K, Raade AS, Langmore SE. A comparison of 2 methods of endoscopic laryngeal sensory testing: a preliminary study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(3):187–93.CrossRef Kaneoka A, Krisciunas GP, Walsh K, Raade AS, Langmore SE. A comparison of 2 methods of endoscopic laryngeal sensory testing: a preliminary study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(3):187–93.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hiss SG, Postma GN. Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. The Laryngoscope. 2003;113:1386–93.CrossRef Hiss SG, Postma GN. Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. The Laryngoscope. 2003;113:1386–93.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kasle DA, Torabi SJ, Narwani V, Manes RP. Medicare Reimbursement for Balloon Catheter Dilations Among Surgeons Performing High Volumes of the Procedures to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(3):264–9.CrossRef Kasle DA, Torabi SJ, Narwani V, Manes RP. Medicare Reimbursement for Balloon Catheter Dilations Among Surgeons Performing High Volumes of the Procedures to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(3):264–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Espitalier F, Fanous A, Aviv J, Bassiouny S, Desuter G, Nerurkar N, Postma G, Crevier-Buchman L. International consensus (ICON) on assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. 2018;135(1):S17-21.CrossRef Espitalier F, Fanous A, Aviv J, Bassiouny S, Desuter G, Nerurkar N, Postma G, Crevier-Buchman L. International consensus (ICON) on assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases. 2018;135(1):S17-21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Aviv JE. Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(4):563–74.CrossRef Aviv JE. Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(4):563–74.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Aviv JE, Sataloff RT, Cohen M, Spitzer J, Ma G, Bhayani R, Close LG. Cost-effectiveness of two types of dysphagia care in head and neck cancer: a preliminary report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2001;80(8):553–8.CrossRef Aviv JE, Sataloff RT, Cohen M, Spitzer J, Ma G, Bhayani R, Close LG. Cost-effectiveness of two types of dysphagia care in head and neck cancer: a preliminary report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2001;80(8):553–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1723–7.CrossRef Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1723–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Leal-Leaño LR, Leon-Basantes GA, Bastidas AR, Garcia R, Ovalle S, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2002–10.CrossRef Giraldo-Cadavid LF, Leal-Leaño LR, Leon-Basantes GA, Bastidas AR, Garcia R, Ovalle S, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(9):2002–10.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Merati AL. In-office evaluation of swallowing: FEES, pharyngeal squeeze maneuver, and FEESST. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46(1):31–9.CrossRef Merati AL. In-office evaluation of swallowing: FEES, pharyngeal squeeze maneuver, and FEESST. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013;46(1):31–9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hammer MJ. Design of a new somatosensory stimulus delivery device for measuring laryngeal mechanosensory detection thresholds in humans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(4):1154–9.CrossRef Hammer MJ. Design of a new somatosensory stimulus delivery device for measuring laryngeal mechanosensory detection thresholds in humans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(4):1154–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
High-Volume Billing and Reimbursement Trends for Endoscopic Swallowing Studies in the Medicare Population
Authors
David A. Kasle
Sina J. Torabi
Emily L. Savoca
Michael Lerner
R. Peter Manes
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10215-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Dysphagia 5/2021 Go to the issue