Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 4/2021

Open Access 01-08-2021 | Original Article

Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry

Authors: Kei Aoyama, Kenjiro Kunieda, Takashi Shigematsu, Tomohisa Ohno, Ichiro Fujishima

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Recently, there has been clinical interest in the effect of different body positions on esophageal motility. This study aimed to identify the effect of three different body positions on esophageal motility using high-resolution manometry. Thirteen healthy adults swallowed 5 mL of water in the upright, supine, and bridge positions. For the bridge position, each subject raised their waist against gravity, placed a cushion under their back, and bent their knees. The proximal contractile integral (PCI) and distal contractile integral (DCI), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal latency (DL), peristaltic breaks (PBs), intrabolus pressure (IBP), and expiratory and inspiratory esophagoesophageal junction (EGJ) pressure were measured. In the bridge position, PCI, DCI, IRP, and expiratory and inspiratory EGJ pressure were significantly higher than those in the upright position (bridge PCI vs. upright PCI [p = 0.001], bridge DCI vs. upright DCI [p < 0.001], bridge IRP vs. upright IRP [p = 0.018], bridge EGJ pressure vs. upright EGJ pressure [expiratory: p = 0.001] [inspiratory: p < 0.001]). PBs were significantly shorter and DL was significantly longer in the bridge position compared to upright (bridge PBs vs. upright PBs [p = 0.001], bridge DL vs. upright DL [p = 0.001]). IBP was significantly higher in the bridge position compared to supine (bridge IBP vs. supine IBP [p = 0.01]). These results demonstrated changes in esophageal motility according to changes in position while swallowing, where esophageal contractions became stronger against gravity. Further study is required to examine the effectiveness of swallowing in the bridge position.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Logemann JA. Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:953–63.CrossRef Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Logemann JA. Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:953–63.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Palmer JB, DuChane AS. Rehabilitation of swallowing disorders in the elderly. In: Felsenthal G, Garrison SJ, Steinberg FU, editors. Rehabilitation of the aging and elderly patient. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p. 275–287. Palmer JB, DuChane AS. Rehabilitation of swallowing disorders in the elderly. In: Felsenthal G, Garrison SJ, Steinberg FU, editors. Rehabilitation of the aging and elderly patient. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p. 275–287.
3.
go back to reference Palmer JB, DuChane AS. Rehabilitation of swallowing disorders due to stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 1991;2:529–46.CrossRef Palmer JB, DuChane AS. Rehabilitation of swallowing disorders due to stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 1991;2:529–46.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaye MD, Wexler RM. Alteration of esophageal peristalsis by body position. Dig Dis Sci. 1981;26:897–901.CrossRef Kaye MD, Wexler RM. Alteration of esophageal peristalsis by body position. Dig Dis Sci. 1981;26:897–901.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dooley CP, Schlossmacher B, Valenzuela JE. Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1662–7.CrossRef Dooley CP, Schlossmacher B, Valenzuela JE. Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1662–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sears VW Jr, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:857–64.CrossRef Sears VW Jr, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:857–64.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodème F, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:e509–e516516.CrossRef Xiao Y, Read A, Nicodème F, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:e509–e516516.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Do Carmo GC, Jafari J, Sifrim D, De Oliveira RB. Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):285–92.CrossRef Do Carmo GC, Jafari J, Sifrim D, De Oliveira RB. Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):285–92.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhang X, Xiang X, Tu L, Xie X, Hou X. Esophageal motility in the supine and upright positions for liquid and solid swallows through high-resolution manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19(4):467–72.CrossRef Zhang X, Xiang X, Tu L, Xie X, Hou X. Esophageal motility in the supine and upright positions for liquid and solid swallows through high-resolution manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19(4):467–72.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ciriza-de-los-Ríos C, Canga-Rodríguez-Valcárcel F, Lora-Pablos D, De-La-Cruz-Bértolo J, Castel-de-Lucas I, Castellano-Tortajada G. How the body position can influence high-resolution manometry results in the study of esophageal dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21(3):370.CrossRef Ciriza-de-los-Ríos C, Canga-Rodríguez-Valcárcel F, Lora-Pablos D, De-La-Cruz-Bértolo J, Castel-de-Lucas I, Castellano-Tortajada G. How the body position can influence high-resolution manometry results in the study of esophageal dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21(3):370.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology. 1988;94(1):73–80.CrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology. 1988;94(1):73–80.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kessing BF, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14:197–205.CrossRef Kessing BF, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14:197–205.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. Mechanisms of gastric and supragastric belching: a study using concurrent high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:573–9.CrossRef Kessing BF, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ. Mechanisms of gastric and supragastric belching: a study using concurrent high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:573–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bredenoord AJ, Hebbard GS. Technical aspects of clinical high-resolution manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:5–10.CrossRef Bredenoord AJ, Hebbard GS. Technical aspects of clinical high-resolution manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24:5–10.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: impedance and high-resolution manometry. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(2):131–8.CrossRef Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: impedance and high-resolution manometry. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(2):131–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rosen SP, Abdelhalim SM, Jones CA, McCulloch TM. Effect of body position on pharyngeal swallowing pressures using high-resolution manometry. Dysphagia. 2018;33(3):389–98.CrossRef Rosen SP, Abdelhalim SM, Jones CA, McCulloch TM. Effect of body position on pharyngeal swallowing pressures using high-resolution manometry. Dysphagia. 2018;33(3):389–98.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference de Leon A, Thörn SE, Ottosson J, Wattwil M. Body positions and esophageal sphincter pressures in obese patients during anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:458–63.CrossRef de Leon A, Thörn SE, Ottosson J, Wattwil M. Body positions and esophageal sphincter pressures in obese patients during anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:458–63.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zifan A, Song HJ, Youn YH, Qiu X, Ledgerwood-Lee M, Mittal RK. Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019;316(4):G519–G526526.CrossRef Zifan A, Song HJ, Youn YH, Qiu X, Ledgerwood-Lee M, Mittal RK. Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019;316(4):G519–G526526.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE, International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160–74.CrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE, International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160–74.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A, Kawami N, Hoshino S, Takenouchi N, Hosaka H, Shimoyama Y, Kawamura O, Yamada M, Kusano M. Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):188–94.CrossRef Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A, Kawami N, Hoshino S, Takenouchi N, Hosaka H, Shimoyama Y, Kawamura O, Yamada M, Kusano M. Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):188–94.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, Oshima T, Manabe N, Fujiwara Y, Nagahara A, Kawamura O, Iwakiri R, Ozawa S, Ashida K. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:751–67.CrossRef Iwakiri K, Kinoshita Y, Habu Y, Oshima T, Manabe N, Fujiwara Y, Nagahara A, Kawamura O, Iwakiri R, Ozawa S, Ashida K. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:751–67.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry
Authors
Kei Aoyama
Kenjiro Kunieda
Takashi Shigematsu
Tomohisa Ohno
Ichiro Fujishima
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10169-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Dysphagia 4/2021 Go to the issue