Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 2/2020

01-04-2020 | Foreign Body Aspiration | Original Article

The Penetration–Aspiration Scale: Adaptation to Open Partial Laryngectomy and Reliability Analysis

Authors: Nicole Pizzorni, Erika Crosetti, Elena Santambrogio, Giada de Cillis, Andy Bertolin, Giuseppe Rizzotto, Marco Fantini, Giovanni Succo, Antonio Schindler

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

A standard for assessing swallowing function after open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL) is still not established. The variability in the measures used to investigate swallowing functional outcomes after OPHL limits the communication among clinicians and the possibility to compare and combine results from different studies. The study aims to adapt the PAS to the altered anatomy after OPHLs using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and to test its reliability. To adapt the PAS, two landmarks were identified: the entry of the laryngeal vestibule and the neoglottis. Ninety patients who underwent an OPHL were recruited (27 type I, 31 type II and 32 type III). FEES was performed and video-recorded. Two speech and language therapists (SLTs) independently rated each FEES using the PAS adapted for OPHL (OPHL-PAS). FEES recordings were rated for a second time by both SLTs at least 15 days from the first video analysis. Inter- and intra-rater agreement was assessed using unweighted Cohen’s kappa. Overall, inter-rater agreement of the OPHL-PAS was k = 0.863, while intra-rater agreement was k = 0.854. Concerning different OPHL types, inter- and intra-rater agreement were k = 0.924 and k = 0.914 for type I, k = 0.865 and k = 0.790 for type II, and k = 0.808 and k = 0.858 for type III, respectively. The OPHL-PAS is a reliable scale to assess the invasion of lower airway during swallowing in patients with OPHL using FEES. The study represents the first attempt to define standard tools to assess swallowing functional outcome in this population.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Succo G, Peretti G, Piazza C, Remacle M, Eckel HE, Chevalier D, Simo R, Hantzakos AG, Rizzotto G, Lucioni M, Crosetti E, Antonelli AR. Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: a proposal for classification by the working committee on nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:2489–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3024-4.CrossRefPubMed Succo G, Peretti G, Piazza C, Remacle M, Eckel HE, Chevalier D, Simo R, Hantzakos AG, Rizzotto G, Lucioni M, Crosetti E, Antonelli AR. Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: a proposal for classification by the working committee on nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:2489–96. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00405-014-3024-4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Woisard V, Serrano E, Yardeni E, Puech M, Pessey JJ. Deglutition after supra-glottic laryngectomy. J Otolaryngol. 1993;22:278–83.PubMed Woisard V, Serrano E, Yardeni E, Puech M, Pessey JJ. Deglutition after supra-glottic laryngectomy. J Otolaryngol. 1993;22:278–83.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Naudo P, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Jouffre V, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D. Complications and functional outcome after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;118:124–9.CrossRef Naudo P, Laccourreye O, Weinstein G, Jouffre V, Laccourreye H, Brasnu D. Complications and functional outcome after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;118:124–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Goeleven A, Dejaeger E, Vander Poorten V, Delaere P. Swallowing and functional outcome after partial laryngectomy: a literature review. B-ENT. 2005;1:165–72.PubMed Goeleven A, Dejaeger E, Vander Poorten V, Delaere P. Swallowing and functional outcome after partial laryngectomy: a literature review. B-ENT. 2005;1:165–72.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Zacharek MA, Pasha R, Meleca RJ, Dworkin JP, Stachler RJ, Jacobs JR, Marks SC, Garfield I. Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1558–64.CrossRef Zacharek MA, Pasha R, Meleca RJ, Dworkin JP, Stachler RJ, Jacobs JR, Marks SC, Garfield I. Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1558–64.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gallo O, Deganello A, Gitti G, Santoro R, Senesi M, Scala J, Boddi V, De Campora E. Prognostic role of pneumonia in supracricoid and supraglottic laryngectomies. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:30–8.CrossRef Gallo O, Deganello A, Gitti G, Santoro R, Senesi M, Scala J, Boddi V, De Campora E. Prognostic role of pneumonia in supracricoid and supraglottic laryngectomies. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:30–8.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schindler A, Pizzorni N, Mozzanica F, Fantini M, Ginocchio D, Bertolin A, Crosetti E, Succo G. Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy: what do we not know and what do we need to know? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:3459–75.CrossRef Schindler A, Pizzorni N, Mozzanica F, Fantini M, Ginocchio D, Bertolin A, Crosetti E, Succo G. Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy: what do we not know and what do we need to know? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:3459–75.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leipzig B. Neoglottic reconstruction following total laryngectomy: a reappraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:534–7.CrossRef Leipzig B. Neoglottic reconstruction following total laryngectomy: a reappraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:534–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration–aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.CrossRef Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration–aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22:276–82.CrossRef McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22:276–82.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1723–7.CrossRef Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1723–7.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference de Virgilio A, Simonelli M, Greco A, Gallo A, Moretta A, Wang CC, Martellucci S, Calcagno P, de Vincentiis M. Tracheocutaneous fistula in patients undergoing supracricoid partial laryngectomy: the role of chronic aspiration. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35:9–14. de Virgilio A, Simonelli M, Greco A, Gallo A, Moretta A, Wang CC, Martellucci S, Calcagno P, de Vincentiis M. Tracheocutaneous fistula in patients undergoing supracricoid partial laryngectomy: the role of chronic aspiration. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2015;35:9–14.
37.
go back to reference McCullough GH, Rosenbek JC. Ordinality and intervality of a penetration–aspiration scale. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 1998;6:65–72. McCullough GH, Rosenbek JC. Ordinality and intervality of a penetration–aspiration scale. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 1998;6:65–72.
Metadata
Title
The Penetration–Aspiration Scale: Adaptation to Open Partial Laryngectomy and Reliability Analysis
Authors
Nicole Pizzorni
Erika Crosetti
Elena Santambrogio
Giada de Cillis
Andy Bertolin
Giuseppe Rizzotto
Marco Fantini
Giovanni Succo
Antonio Schindler
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10025-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Dysphagia 2/2020 Go to the issue