Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Article

The Effect of the Cervical Orthosis on Swallowing Physiology and Cervical Spine Motion During Swallowing

Authors: Kojiro Mekata, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Jun Matsubayashi, Kazukiyo Toda, Yasuhiro Hasegawa, Yasuo Ito

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Cervical orthosis is used to immobilize the neck in various disorders such as trauma and post-operation. However, it is still uncertain how cervical orthosis restricts the degree of movement of the cervical spine during swallowing and how they affect swallowing physiology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these issues using the Philadelphia® Collar. We conducted videofluorography of swallowing in 39 healthy subjects (23 men, 16 women; mean age of 34.3 years) with and without cervical orthosis. To compare the two conditions regarding the cervical spine motion, we determined the angular and positional changes of the occipital bone (C0) and each cervical vertebra (C1–C7) from the oral phase to the pharyngeal phase. Similarly, to compare swallowing physiology, we assessed the start and end times and the durations of soft palate elevation, rapid hyoid anterosuperior movement, epiglottis inversion, closure of the laryngeal vestibule, and pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) opening. Finally, we compared the transit times of contrast agent in the two conditions. The respective extensions of C1, C2, and C3 were 0.31°, 0.07°, and 0.05° (mean) with cervical orthosis, and the respective flexions of C1, C2, and C3 were 0.98°, 1.42°, and 0.85° (mean) without. These results suggested that cervical orthosis restricted the flexion of C1–C3. Analysis of swallowing physiology revealed that the average durations of hyoid anterosuperior elevation, epiglottic inversion, and PES opening were prolonged by 0.09, 0.19, and 0.05 s, respectively. In conclusion, the cervical orthosis restricted the movement of the cervical spine during swallowing and changed swallowing physiology.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Pimenta AP. Dysphagia and cervical exostoses. Arq Gastroenterol. 1979;16:86–90.PubMed Pimenta AP. Dysphagia and cervical exostoses. Arq Gastroenterol. 1979;16:86–90.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ, et al. What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:658–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rihn JA, Kane J, Albert TJ, et al. What is the incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:658–65.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Stachniak JB, Diebner JD, Brunk ES, et al. Analysis of prevertebral soft-tissue swelling and dysphagia in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in patients at risk for pseudarthrosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:244–9.CrossRefPubMed Stachniak JB, Diebner JD, Brunk ES, et al. Analysis of prevertebral soft-tissue swelling and dysphagia in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in patients at risk for pseudarthrosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:244–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, et al. Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:1–8.CrossRefPubMed McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, et al. Lower incidence of dysphagia with cervical arthroplasty compared with ACDF in a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine. 2008;33:1305–12.CrossRefPubMed Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine. 2008;33:1305–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Radcliff KE, Koyonos L, Clyde C, et al. What is the incidence of dysphagia after posterior cervical surgery? Spine. 2013;38:1082–8.CrossRefPubMed Radcliff KE, Koyonos L, Clyde C, et al. What is the incidence of dysphagia after posterior cervical surgery? Spine. 2013;38:1082–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bisch EM, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, et al. Swallow effects of the SOMI brace. Abstracts of the 1992 ASHA convention; 1992. 130. Bisch EM, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, et al. Swallow effects of the SOMI brace. Abstracts of the 1992 ASHA convention; 1992. 130.
11.
go back to reference Odderson IR, Lietzow D. Dysphagia complications of the Minerva brace. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1386–8.CrossRefPubMed Odderson IR, Lietzow D. Dysphagia complications of the Minerva brace. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1386–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. Austin: PRO-ED Inc; 1993. Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. Austin: PRO-ED Inc; 1993.
14.
go back to reference Marshall DL, Tuchin PJ. Correlation of cervical lordosis measurement with incidence of motor vehicle accidents. Australas Chiropr Osteopat. 1996;5:79–85. Marshall DL, Tuchin PJ. Correlation of cervical lordosis measurement with incidence of motor vehicle accidents. Australas Chiropr Osteopat. 1996;5:79–85.
15.
go back to reference Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, et al. The effect of bolus viscosity on laryngeal closure in swallowing: kinematic analysis using 320-row area detector CT. Dysphagia. 2013;28:33–42.CrossRefPubMed Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, et al. The effect of bolus viscosity on laryngeal closure in swallowing: kinematic analysis using 320-row area detector CT. Dysphagia. 2013;28:33–42.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Stambolis V, Brady S, Klos D, et al. The effects of cervical bracing upon swallowing in young, normal, healthy volunteers. Dysphagia. 2003;18:39–45.CrossRefPubMed Stambolis V, Brady S, Klos D, et al. The effects of cervical bracing upon swallowing in young, normal, healthy volunteers. Dysphagia. 2003;18:39–45.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. London: College-Hill Press; 1998. Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. London: College-Hill Press; 1998.
19.
go back to reference Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Cheng J, et al. Closure mechanisms of laryngeal vestibule during swallow. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:338–44. Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Cheng J, et al. Closure mechanisms of laryngeal vestibule during swallow. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:338–44.
20.
go back to reference Kendall KA, Leonard RJ, McKenzie S. Airway protection: evaluation with videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2004;19:65–70.PubMed Kendall KA, Leonard RJ, McKenzie S. Airway protection: evaluation with videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2004;19:65–70.PubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, et al. Oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older women: videofluoroscopic analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45:434–45.CrossRefPubMed Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, et al. Oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older women: videofluoroscopic analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45:434–45.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Reimers-Neils L, Logemann J, Larson C. Viscosity effects on EMG activity in normal swallow. Dysphagia. 1994;9:101–6.CrossRefPubMed Reimers-Neils L, Logemann J, Larson C. Viscosity effects on EMG activity in normal swallow. Dysphagia. 1994;9:101–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Effect of the Cervical Orthosis on Swallowing Physiology and Cervical Spine Motion During Swallowing
Authors
Kojiro Mekata
Tomoyuki Takigawa
Jun Matsubayashi
Kazukiyo Toda
Yasuhiro Hasegawa
Yasuo Ito
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9660-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Dysphagia 1/2016 Go to the issue