Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 2/2013

Open Access 01-06-2013 | Original Article

Matching the Rheological Properties of Videofluoroscopic Contrast Agents and Thickened Liquid Prescriptions

Authors: S. Popa Nita, M. Murith, H. Chisholm, J. Engmann

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

In the treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia, the link between diagnosis and prescription of thickened liquids that are safe to swallow is not always straightforward. Frequently, the capacity to objectively assess and quantify the rheological properties of diagnostic test fluids and to select “rheologically equivalent” dietary products is missing. Perhaps sometimes the importance of an objective comparison is not fully appreciated because two liquids seem reasonably similar in a subjective comparison (e.g., flow from a spoon). The present study deals with some of these issues. Shear viscosity measurements were used to characterize the flow behavior of videofluoroscopic contrast agents and of thickened fluids prepared with commercial thickening agents. Effects of time and composition of the different fluids were analyzed regarding shear-rate-dependent viscosity. Nearly all materials tested showed a pronounced dependence of viscosity with shear rate (“shear thinning”). Results confirm that it is feasible (but not always straightforward) to “match” the viscosities of diagnostic fluids and thickened beverages if certain precautions are taken. For example, the time required to reach final viscosity levels can be significant for some thickeners, particularly when used with liquids containing contrast agents. It is recommend to use only diagnostic materials and thickening agents for which reliable viscosity data are available.
Footnotes
1
A certain (loose) analogy to consider here could be fuel consumption in cars. The liters (or gallons) consumed per kilometer (or mile) depend on the driving speed, and comparing different levels of fuel consumption is meaningful only when referring to the same driving conditions. Likewise, viscosities (force needed to maintain a flow) can only be sensibly compared for equivalent shear rates.
 
2
It would have been preferable to have the same measurement condition as described in the NDD standard (25 °C), but nevertheless the conclusions of the present study are valid, as not more than 10 % variation in viscosity is measured in this temperature range.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strowd L. Dysphagia dietary guidelines and the rheology of nutritional feeds and barium test feeds. Chest. 2008;133:1397–401.PubMedCrossRef Strowd L. Dysphagia dietary guidelines and the rheology of nutritional feeds and barium test feeds. Chest. 2008;133:1397–401.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stuart S, Motz JM. Viscosity in infant dysphagia management: comparison of viscosity of thickened liquids used in assessment and thickened liquids used in treatment. Dysphagia. 2009;24:412–22.PubMedCrossRef Stuart S, Motz JM. Viscosity in infant dysphagia management: comparison of viscosity of thickened liquids used in assessment and thickened liquids used in treatment. Dysphagia. 2009;24:412–22.PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Glassburn DL, Deem JF. Thickener viscosity in dysphagia management: variability among speech-language pathologists. Dysphagia. 1998;13:218–22.PubMedCrossRef Glassburn DL, Deem JF. Thickener viscosity in dysphagia management: variability among speech-language pathologists. Dysphagia. 1998;13:218–22.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smith CH, Logemann JA, Burghardt WR, Carrell TD, Zecker SG. Oral sensory discrimination of fluid viscosity. Dysphagia. 1997;12:68–73.PubMedCrossRef Smith CH, Logemann JA, Burghardt WR, Carrell TD, Zecker SG. Oral sensory discrimination of fluid viscosity. Dysphagia. 1997;12:68–73.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith CH, Logemann JA, Burghardt WR, Zecker SG, Rademaker AW. Oral and oropharyngeal perceptions of fluid viscosity across the age span. Dysphagia. 2006;21:209–17.PubMedCrossRef Smith CH, Logemann JA, Burghardt WR, Zecker SG, Rademaker AW. Oral and oropharyngeal perceptions of fluid viscosity across the age span. Dysphagia. 2006;21:209–17.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Macosko CW. Rheology: principles, measurements, and applications. New York: VCH Publishers; 1994. Macosko CW. Rheology: principles, measurements, and applications. New York: VCH Publishers; 1994.
8.
go back to reference Barnes HA. A handbook of elementary rheology. Aberystwyth: University of Wales; 2000. Barnes HA. A handbook of elementary rheology. Aberystwyth: University of Wales; 2000.
9.
go back to reference Barnes HA. Viscosity. Aberystwyth: University of Wales; 2002. Barnes HA. Viscosity. Aberystwyth: University of Wales; 2002.
10.
go back to reference Cichero J. Which one of these is not like the others? An inter-hospital study of the viscosity of thickened fluids. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:537–47.PubMed Cichero J. Which one of these is not like the others? An inter-hospital study of the viscosity of thickened fluids. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:537–47.PubMed
12.
go back to reference The British Dietetic Association. National descriptors for texture modification in adults. Birmingham: The British Dietetic Association; 2009. The British Dietetic Association. National descriptors for texture modification in adults. Birmingham: The British Dietetic Association; 2009.
13.
go back to reference Atherton M, Bellis-Smith N, Cichero J, Suter M. Texture-modified foods and thickened fluids as used for individuals with dysphagia: Australian standardised labels and definitions. Nutr Diet. 2007;64:S53–76.CrossRef Atherton M, Bellis-Smith N, Cichero J, Suter M. Texture-modified foods and thickened fluids as used for individuals with dysphagia: Australian standardised labels and definitions. Nutr Diet. 2007;64:S53–76.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference National Dysphagia Diet Task Force. National Dysphagia Diet: standardization for optimal care. Chicago: American Dietetic Association; 2002. National Dysphagia Diet Task Force. National Dysphagia Diet: standardization for optimal care. Chicago: American Dietetic Association; 2002.
15.
go back to reference Towle L. The National Dysphagia Diet: where are we now? Diet Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;27:1–4. Towle L. The National Dysphagia Diet: where are we now? Diet Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;27:1–4.
16.
17.
go back to reference Ekberg O, Stading M, Johansson D, Bülow M, Ekman S, Wendin K. Flow properties of oral contrast medium formulations depend on the temperature. Acta Radiol. 2010;4:363–7.CrossRef Ekberg O, Stading M, Johansson D, Bülow M, Ekman S, Wendin K. Flow properties of oral contrast medium formulations depend on the temperature. Acta Radiol. 2010;4:363–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference O’Leary M, Hanson B, Smith C. Viscosity and non-Newtonian features. J Food Sci. 2010;75:E330–8.PubMedCrossRef O’Leary M, Hanson B, Smith C. Viscosity and non-Newtonian features. J Food Sci. 2010;75:E330–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pelletier CA. A comparison of consistency and taste of five commercial thickeners. Dysphagia. 1997;12:74–8.PubMedCrossRef Pelletier CA. A comparison of consistency and taste of five commercial thickeners. Dysphagia. 1997;12:74–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Steele CM, Van Lieshout PH, Goff DH. The rheology of liquids: a comparison of clinicians’ subjective impressions and objective measurement. Dysphagia. 2003;18:182–95.PubMedCrossRef Steele CM, Van Lieshout PH, Goff DH. The rheology of liquids: a comparison of clinicians’ subjective impressions and objective measurement. Dysphagia. 2003;18:182–95.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cichero J, Hay G, Murdoch B, Halley PJ. Videofluoroscopic fluids versus mealtime fluids: differences in viscosity and density made clear. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;5:203–15. Cichero J, Hay G, Murdoch B, Halley PJ. Videofluoroscopic fluids versus mealtime fluids: differences in viscosity and density made clear. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;5:203–15.
22.
go back to reference Moller PCF, Mewis J, Bonn D. Yield stress and thixotropy: on the difficulty of measuring yield stresses in practice. Soft Matter. 2006;2:274–83.CrossRef Moller PCF, Mewis J, Bonn D. Yield stress and thixotropy: on the difficulty of measuring yield stresses in practice. Soft Matter. 2006;2:274–83.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Clavé P, Arreola V, Romea M, Medina L, Palomera E, Serra-Prat M. Accuracy of the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:806–15.PubMedCrossRef Clavé P, Arreola V, Romea M, Medina L, Palomera E, Serra-Prat M. Accuracy of the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical screening of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:806–15.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Conde-Petit B, Pfirter A, Escher F. Influence of xanthan on the rheological properties of aqueous starch-emulsifier systems. Food Hydrocoll. 1997;11:393–9.CrossRef Conde-Petit B, Pfirter A, Escher F. Influence of xanthan on the rheological properties of aqueous starch-emulsifier systems. Food Hydrocoll. 1997;11:393–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Matching the Rheological Properties of Videofluoroscopic Contrast Agents and Thickened Liquid Prescriptions
Authors
S. Popa Nita
M. Murith
H. Chisholm
J. Engmann
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9441-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Dysphagia 2/2013 Go to the issue