Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 2/2012

01-06-2012 | Original Article

UES Pressure During Phonation Using High-resolution Manometry and 24-h Dual-probe pH-metry in Patients with Muscle Tension Dysphonia

Authors: Evelyne Van Houtte, Kristiane Van Lierde, Evelien D’haeseleer, Bart Van Imschoot, Sofie Claeys

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is the pathological condition in which excessive tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature leads to a disturbed voice. This study was developed to investigate if differences in pressure in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) were present in patients with MTD in comparison with normal speakers. Concurrently, all patients were screened for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as an associated cause or aggravating factor in MTD. The study’s design was a prospective case-control study. Fourteen patients with MTD (mean age = 40.2 years, range = 22–62 years) and 14 adult controls (mean age = 33.9 years, range = 23–58 years) were studied. A water-perfusion assembly with 22 sensors was positioned to record pressures during phonation. The mean values of the phonation pressures at the UES were measured. All patients underwent a dual-probe 24-h ambulatory pH impedance in order to measure the pH and the height of the refluxes from the lower esophageal sphincter to the hypopharynx. There were no significant differences in the UES pressures of patients with MTD compared to those of normal speakers during phonation tasks and reading. Two patients were identified with GERD. In these patients the refluxate reached the UES but this did not influence the UES pressures. We conclude that this study was not able to detect differences in phonation-induced UES pressures between patients with MTD and normal speakers using a standard water-perfusion high-resolution manometry assembly. Future investigation should be focused on developing probes with closely spaced sensors in the hypopharynx and the esophagus in order to investigate if differences in UES pressures in these study populations are present.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rubin J, Sataloff RT, Korovin g. Diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2005. Rubin J, Sataloff RT, Korovin g. Diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2005.
2.
go back to reference Morrison MD, Rammage LA. Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993;113:428–34.PubMedCrossRef Morrison MD, Rammage LA. Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993;113:428–34.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Morrison MD, Nichol H, Rammage LA. Diagnostic criteria in functional dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 1986;96:1–8.PubMedCrossRef Morrison MD, Nichol H, Rammage LA. Diagnostic criteria in functional dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 1986;96:1–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sama A, Carding PN, Price S, Kelly P, Wilson JA. The clinical features of functional dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:458–63.PubMedCrossRef Sama A, Carding PN, Price S, Kelly P, Wilson JA. The clinical features of functional dysphonia. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:458–63.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Perera L, Hofmann C, Tatro L, Chai K, Kuribayashi S, Lawal A, Shaker R. Manometric evidence for a phonation-induced UES contractile reflex. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294:885–91.CrossRef Perera L, Hofmann C, Tatro L, Chai K, Kuribayashi S, Lawal A, Shaker R. Manometric evidence for a phonation-induced UES contractile reflex. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;294:885–91.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux diseases (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1–78.PubMed Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux diseases (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1–78.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16:274–7.PubMedCrossRef Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16:274–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M. Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:385–8.PubMedCrossRef Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M. Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:385–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Altman KW, Lazarus C. Current and emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month review. J Voice. 2005;19:261–7.PubMedCrossRef Altman KW, Lazarus C. Current and emerging concepts in muscle tension dysphonia: a 30-month review. J Voice. 2005;19:261–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Torrico S, Kern M, Aslam M, Narayanan S, Kannappan A, Ren J, Sui Z, Hofman C, Shaker R. Upper esophageal sphincter function during gastroesophageal reflux events revisited. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:262–7. Torrico S, Kern M, Aslam M, Narayanan S, Kannappan A, Ren J, Sui Z, Hofman C, Shaker R. Upper esophageal sphincter function during gastroesophageal reflux events revisited. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:262–7.
11.
go back to reference Vilkman E, Hurme P, Korkko P. External laryngeal frame function in voice production revisited: a review. J Voice. 1996;10:78–92.PubMedCrossRef Vilkman E, Hurme P, Korkko P. External laryngeal frame function in voice production revisited: a review. J Voice. 1996;10:78–92.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M. Extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice. 2002;16:333–43.PubMedCrossRef Angsuwarangsee T, Morrison M. Extrinsic laryngeal muscular tension in patients with voice disorders. J Voice. 2002;16:333–43.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van Lierde K, Dhaeseleer E, Wuyts F, Claeys S. The treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: comparison of two treatment techniques by means of an objective multiparameter approach. J Voice. 2010;24:294–301.PubMedCrossRef Van Lierde K, Dhaeseleer E, Wuyts F, Claeys S. The treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: comparison of two treatment techniques by means of an objective multiparameter approach. J Voice. 2010;24:294–301.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Van Lierde K, Bernart L, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberghe P. Outcome of manual voice therapy in four Dutch adults with persistent moderate to severe vocal hyperfunction: a pilot study. J Voice. 2004;18:467–74.PubMedCrossRef Van Lierde K, Bernart L, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberghe P. Outcome of manual voice therapy in four Dutch adults with persistent moderate to severe vocal hyperfunction: a pilot study. J Voice. 2004;18:467–74.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wuyts F, De Bodt M, Molenberghs G, Heylen L, Millet B, Van Lierde K, Raes J, Van de Heyning P. The Dysphonia Severity Index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:796–809.PubMed Wuyts F, De Bodt M, Molenberghs G, Heylen L, Millet B, Van Lierde K, Raes J, Van de Heyning P. The Dysphonia Severity Index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:796–809.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1549–56.PubMedCrossRef Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1549–56.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mesallam TA, Stemple JC, Sobeih TM, Elluru RG. Reflux symptom index versus reflux finding score. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116:436–40.PubMed Mesallam TA, Stemple JC, Sobeih TM, Elluru RG. Reflux symptom index versus reflux finding score. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007;116:436–40.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Hakkesteegt MM, Brocaar MP, Mulder P, Feenstra L. The interobserver and test-retest variability of the Dysphonia Severity Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60:86–90.PubMedCrossRef Hakkesteegt MM, Brocaar MP, Mulder P, Feenstra L. The interobserver and test-retest variability of the Dysphonia Severity Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60:86–90.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Remacle M. The contribution of videolaryngostroboscopy in daily ENT practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1996;50:265–83.PubMed Remacle M. The contribution of videolaryngostroboscopy in daily ENT practice. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1996;50:265–83.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Richter JE, DeMeester TR, Wu WC. Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode and gender. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:849–56.PubMedCrossRef Richter JE, DeMeester TR, Wu WC. Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode and gender. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:849–56.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gill C, Morrison MD. Esophagolaryngeal reflex in a porcine animal model. J Otolaryngol. 1998;27:76–80.PubMed Gill C, Morrison MD. Esophagolaryngeal reflex in a porcine animal model. J Otolaryngol. 1998;27:76–80.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bove M, Cange L, Mansson I. 24-h pharyngeal pH monitoring in healthy volunteers: a normative study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;3:234–41. Bove M, Cange L, Mansson I. 24-h pharyngeal pH monitoring in healthy volunteers: a normative study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;3:234–41.
24.
go back to reference Milstein CF, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, Richter JE, Vaezi MF. Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs. flexible laryngoscope). Laryngoscope. 2005;115:2256–61.PubMedCrossRef Milstein CF, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, Richter JE, Vaezi MF. Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs. flexible laryngoscope). Laryngoscope. 2005;115:2256–61.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, Claeys S. Pathophysiology and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: a review of the current knowledge. J Voice. 2011;25:202–7.PubMedCrossRef Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, Claeys S. Pathophysiology and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: a review of the current knowledge. J Voice. 2011;25:202–7.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
UES Pressure During Phonation Using High-resolution Manometry and 24-h Dual-probe pH-metry in Patients with Muscle Tension Dysphonia
Authors
Evelyne Van Houtte
Kristiane Van Lierde
Evelien D’haeseleer
Bart Van Imschoot
Sofie Claeys
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9354-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Dysphagia 2/2012 Go to the issue