Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics 11/2006

01-11-2006 | Original Paper

Static and dynamic standing balance: test-retest reliability and reference values in 9 to 10 year old children

Authors: Elisabeth Geldhof, Greet Cardon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Lieven Danneels, Pascal Coorevits, Guy Vanderstraeten, Dirk De Clercq

Published in: European Journal of Pediatrics | Issue 11/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Based on the literature, reliability reports and normative data for bilateral stance assessments in elementary schoolchildren are limited. The present study was designed to report test-retest reliability and reference values for postural stability in 9 to 10 years old schoolchildren using the Balance Master system.

Materials and methods

Twenty children participated in the reproducibility study (mean age 10.1±0.7) including test and retest measurement with a one-week interval. The modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB) quantified children’s static standing balance. The test for the limits of stability (LOS) measured dynamic standing balance. The study sample to determine reference values consisted of 99 children (mean age 9.8±0.5).

Results

The ICCs for inter-item reliability of the four sensory conditions of the mCTSIB showed fair to excellent reliability (ICCs between 0.62 and 0.80). The reproducibility between test and retest was non-significant for the condition ‘firm surface with eyes closed’ (ICC of 0.37), fair to good for the three other sensory conditions (ICCs between 0.59 and 0.68), and excellent for the composite sway velocity (ICC of 0.77). For all LOS parameters, the significant ICCs showed fair to good reproducibility (ICCs between 0.44 and 0.62), with the exception of the non-significant ICC for the composite reaction time. The ICCs for the separate LOS parameters showed fair to good and excellent reliability for nine parameters (ICCs between 0.46 and 0.81), while 11 separate LOS scores did not demonstrate significant ICCs.

Discussion

Analysing reference values, girls performed better on all the composite balance parameters compared to boys, with the exception of reaction time and movement velocity. No differences were found on standing balance scores between 9 and 10 year olds.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Balance Master showed fair to good reliability for most postural parameters in 9 to 10 year olds. The current data on postural control in children aged 9 to 10 years are relevant for research in other domains within the clinical field, like obesitas and developmental coordination disorder or in relation to back pain prevalence at early age.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atwater SW, Crowe TK, Deitz JC, Richardson PK (1990) Interrater and test-retest reliability of two pediatric balance tests. Phys Ther 70:79–87PubMed Atwater SW, Crowe TK, Deitz JC, Richardson PK (1990) Interrater and test-retest reliability of two pediatric balance tests. Phys Ther 70:79–87PubMed
2.
go back to reference Baker CP, Newstead AH, Mossberg KA, Nicodemus CL (1998) Reliability of static standing balance in nondisabled children. Pediatr Rehabil 2:15–20PubMed Baker CP, Newstead AH, Mossberg KA, Nicodemus CL (1998) Reliability of static standing balance in nondisabled children. Pediatr Rehabil 2:15–20PubMed
3.
go back to reference Birmingham T (2000) Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional instability measures. Clin J Sport Med 10:264–268PubMedCrossRef Birmingham T (2000) Test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional instability measures. Clin J Sport Med 10:264–268PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brouwer B, Culham EG, Liston RA, Grant T (1998) Normal variability of postural measures: implications for the reliability of relative balance performance outcomes. Scand J Rehabil Med 30:131–137PubMedCrossRef Brouwer B, Culham EG, Liston RA, Grant T (1998) Normal variability of postural measures: implications for the reliability of relative balance performance outcomes. Scand J Rehabil Med 30:131–137PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cambier D, Cools A, Danneels L, Witvrouw E (2001) Reference data for 4- and 5-year-old-children on the Balance Master: values and clinical feasibility. Eur J Pediatr 160:317PubMedCrossRef Cambier D, Cools A, Danneels L, Witvrouw E (2001) Reference data for 4- and 5-year-old-children on the Balance Master: values and clinical feasibility. Eur J Pediatr 160:317PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Emery CA, Cassidy JD, Klassen TP, Rosychuk RJ, Rowe BB (2005) Development of a clinical static and dynamic standing balance measurement tool appropriate for use in adolescents. Phys Ther 85:502–514PubMed Emery CA, Cassidy JD, Klassen TP, Rosychuk RJ, Rowe BB (2005) Development of a clinical static and dynamic standing balance measurement tool appropriate for use in adolescents. Phys Ther 85:502–514PubMed
7.
go back to reference Figura F, Cama G, Capranica L, Guidetti L, Pulejo C (1991) Assessment of static balance in children. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 31:235–242PubMed Figura F, Cama G, Capranica L, Guidetti L, Pulejo C (1991) Assessment of static balance in children. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 31:235–242PubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Gabriel LS, Mu K (2002) Computerized platform posturography for children: test-retest reliability of the sensory test of the VSR system. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 22:101–117PubMedCrossRef Gabriel LS, Mu K (2002) Computerized platform posturography for children: test-retest reliability of the sensory test of the VSR system. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 22:101–117PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hatzitaki V, Zisi V, Kollias I, Kioumourtzoglou E (2002) Perceptual-motor contributions to static and dynamic balance control in children. J Mot Behav 34:161–170PubMedCrossRef Hatzitaki V, Zisi V, Kollias I, Kioumourtzoglou E (2002) Perceptual-motor contributions to static and dynamic balance control in children. J Mot Behav 34:161–170PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lafond D, Corriveau H, Hebert R, Prince F (2004) Intrasession reliability of center of pressure measures of postural steadiness in healthy elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:896–901PubMedCrossRef Lafond D, Corriveau H, Hebert R, Prince F (2004) Intrasession reliability of center of pressure measures of postural steadiness in healthy elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:896–901PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lebiedowska MK, Syczewska M (2000) Invariant sway properties in children. Gait Posture 12:200–204PubMedCrossRef Lebiedowska MK, Syczewska M (2000) Invariant sway properties in children. Gait Posture 12:200–204PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee HY, Cherng RJ, Lin CH (2004) Development of a virtual reality environment for somatosensory and perceptual stimulation in the balance assessment of children. Comput Biol Med 34:719–733PubMedCrossRef Lee HY, Cherng RJ, Lin CH (2004) Development of a virtual reality environment for somatosensory and perceptual stimulation in the balance assessment of children. Comput Biol Med 34:719–733PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference McEvoy MP, Grimmer K (2005) Reliability of upright posture measurements in primary school children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:35–45PubMedCrossRef McEvoy MP, Grimmer K (2005) Reliability of upright posture measurements in primary school children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:35–45PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Nolan L, Grigorenko A, Thorstensson A (2005) Balance control: sex and age differences in 9- to 16-year-olds. Dev Med Child Neurol 47:449–454PubMedCrossRef Nolan L, Grigorenko A, Thorstensson A (2005) Balance control: sex and age differences in 9- to 16-year-olds. Dev Med Child Neurol 47:449–454PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Riach C, Starkes J (1994) Velocity of centre of pressure excursions as an indicator of postural control systems in children. Gait Posture 2:167–172CrossRef Riach C, Starkes J (1994) Velocity of centre of pressure excursions as an indicator of postural control systems in children. Gait Posture 2:167–172CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rival C, Ceyte H, Olivier I (2005) Developmental changes of static standing balance in children. Neurosci Lett 376:133–136PubMedCrossRef Rival C, Ceyte H, Olivier I (2005) Developmental changes of static standing balance in children. Neurosci Lett 376:133–136PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schmid M, Conforto S, Lopez L, Renzi P, D’Alessio T (2005) The development of postural strategies in children: a factorial design study. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 30:29–39CrossRef Schmid M, Conforto S, Lopez L, Renzi P, D’Alessio T (2005) The development of postural strategies in children: a factorial design study. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 30:29–39CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Static and dynamic standing balance: test-retest reliability and reference values in 9 to 10 year old children
Authors
Elisabeth Geldhof
Greet Cardon
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Lieven Danneels
Pascal Coorevits
Guy Vanderstraeten
Dirk De Clercq
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics / Issue 11/2006
Print ISSN: 0340-6199
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-006-0173-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2006

European Journal of Pediatrics 11/2006 Go to the issue