Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Brain Structure and Function 1/2022

01-01-2022 | Original Article

Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults’ neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty

Authors: Mark A. Eckert, Susan Teubner-Rhodes, Kenneth I. Vaden Jr., Jayne B. Ahlstrom, Carolyn M. McClaskey, Judy R. Dubno

Published in: Brain Structure and Function | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Older adults with hearing loss experience significant difficulties understanding speech in noise, perhaps due in part to limited benefit from supporting executive functions that enable the use of environmental cues signaling changes in listening conditions. Here we examined the degree to which 41 older adults (60.56–86.25 years) exhibited cortical responses to informative listening difficulty cues that communicated the listening difficulty for each trial compared to neutral cues that were uninformative of listening difficulty. Word recognition was significantly higher for informative compared to uninformative cues in a + 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) condition, and response latencies were significantly shorter for informative cues in the + 10 dB SNR and the more-challenging + 2 dB SNR conditions. Informative cues were associated with elevated blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast in visual and parietal cortex. A cue–SNR interaction effect was observed in the cingulo-opercular (CO) network, such that activity only differed between SNR conditions when an informative cue was presented. That is, participants used the informative cues to prepare for changes in listening difficulty from one trial to the next. This cue–SNR interaction effect was driven by older adults with more low-frequency hearing loss and was not observed for those with more high-frequency hearing loss, poorer set-shifting task performance, and lower frontal operculum gray matter volume. These results suggest that proactive strategies for engaging CO adaptive control may be important for older adults with high-frequency hearing loss to optimize speech recognition in changing and challenging listening conditions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Avants BB, Tustison N, Song G (2009) Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J 2:1–35 Avants BB, Tustison N, Song G (2009) Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J 2:1–35
go back to reference Gaser C, Dahnke R (2016) CAT-A Computational Anatomty Toolbox for the analysis of structural MRI data. Paper presented at the Human Brain Mapping. Geneva, Switzerland Gaser C, Dahnke R (2016) CAT-A Computational Anatomty Toolbox for the analysis of structural MRI data. Paper presented at the Human Brain Mapping. Geneva, Switzerland
go back to reference Hancock PA, Meshkati N, Robertson MM (1985) Physiological reflections of mental workload. Aviat Space Environ Med 56(11):1110–1114PubMed Hancock PA, Meshkati N, Robertson MM (1985) Physiological reflections of mental workload. Aviat Space Environ Med 56(11):1110–1114PubMed
go back to reference Jayakody DM, Friedland PL, Nel E, Martins RN, Atlas MD, Sohrabi HR (2017) Impact of cochlear implantation on cognitive functions of older adults: pilot test results. Otol Neurotol 38(8):e289–e295CrossRefPubMed Jayakody DM, Friedland PL, Nel E, Martins RN, Atlas MD, Sohrabi HR (2017) Impact of cochlear implantation on cognitive functions of older adults: pilot test results. Otol Neurotol 38(8):e289–e295CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kongs SK, Thompson LL, Iverson GL, Heaton RK (2000) Wisconsin card sorting test, 64 Card Version. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz Kongs SK, Thompson LL, Iverson GL, Heaton RK (2000) Wisconsin card sorting test, 64 Card Version. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz
go back to reference Luks TL, Simpson GV, Feiwell RJ, Miller WL (2002) Evidence for anterior cingulate cortex involvement in monitoring preparatory attentional set. Neuroimage 17(2):792–802CrossRefPubMed Luks TL, Simpson GV, Feiwell RJ, Miller WL (2002) Evidence for anterior cingulate cortex involvement in monitoring preparatory attentional set. Neuroimage 17(2):792–802CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, Edwards B, Hornsby BW, Humes LE, Lemke U, Lunner T, Matthen M, Mackersie CL, Naylor G, Phillips NA, Richter M, Rudner M, Sommers MS, Tremblay KL, Wingfield A (2016) Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear Hear 37(Suppl 1):5S-27S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312CrossRefPubMed Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, Edwards B, Hornsby BW, Humes LE, Lemke U, Lunner T, Matthen M, Mackersie CL, Naylor G, Phillips NA, Richter M, Rudner M, Sommers MS, Tremblay KL, Wingfield A (2016) Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear Hear 37(Suppl 1):5S-27S. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​AUD.​0000000000000312​CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Trenerry MR, Crosson B, DeBoe J, Leber WR (1989) Stroop neuropsychological screening test. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa Trenerry MR, Crosson B, DeBoe J, Leber WR (1989) Stroop neuropsychological screening test. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa
Metadata
Title
Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults’ neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty
Authors
Mark A. Eckert
Susan Teubner-Rhodes
Kenneth I. Vaden Jr.
Jayne B. Ahlstrom
Carolyn M. McClaskey
Judy R. Dubno
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Brain Structure and Function / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02398-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Brain Structure and Function 1/2022 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor