Top

Published in:

01-09-2021 | Original Article

Inside the head of snakes: influence of size, phylogeny, and sensory ecology on endocranium morphology

Authors: Marion Segall, Raphaël Cornette, Arne R. Rasmussen, Christopher J. Raxworthy

Published in: Brain Structure and Function | Issue 7/2021

Abstract

Environmental properties, and the behavioral habits of species impact sensory cues available for foraging, predator avoidance and inter/intraspecific communication. Consequently, relationships have been discovered between the sensory ecology and brain morphology in many groups of vertebrates. However, these types of studies have remained scare on snake. Here, we investigate the link between endocranial shape and the sensory-related ecology of snakes by comparing 36 species of snakes for which we gathered six sensory-ecology characteristics. We use µCT scanning and 3D geometric morphometrics to compare their endocranium in a phylogenetically informed context. Our results demonstrate that size is a major driver of endocranial shape, with smaller species tending to maximize endocranial volume using a more bulbous shape, while larger species share an elongate endocranial morphology. Phylogeny plays a secondary role with more derived snakes diverging the most in endocranial shape, compared to other species. The activity period influences the shape of the olfactory and optic tract, while the foraging habitat impacts the shape of the cerebellum and cranial nerve regions: structures involved in orientation, equilibrium, and sensory information. However, we found that endocranial morphology alone is not sufficient to predict the activity period of a species without prior knowledge of its phylogenetic relationship. Our results thus demonstrate the value of utilizing endocranial shape as complementary information to size and volume in neurobiological studies.

Available only for authorised users

Adams DC (2014a) A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Syst Biol 63:685–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu030CrossRefPubMed

Adams DC (2014b) A method for assessing phylogenetic least squares models for shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Evolution 68:2675–2688. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12463CrossRefPubMed

Adams DC, Collyer ML, Kaliontzopoulou A (2020) Package “geomorph”, pp 1–140

Alfaro ME (2002) Forward attack modes of aquatic feeding garter snakes. Funct Ecol 16:204–215. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00620.xCrossRef

Allemand R, Boistel R, Daghfous G et al (2017) Comparative morphology of snake (Squamata) endocasts: evidence of phylogenetic and ecological signals. J Anat 231:849–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Balanoff AM, Bever GS (2017) The role of endocasts in the study of brain evolution. In: Kaas JH (ed) Evolution of nervous systems, Academic Press, pp 223–241

Balanoff AM, Bever GS, Colbert MW et al (2015) Best practices for digitally constructing endocranial casts: examples from birds and their dinosaurian relatives. J Anat 229:173–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12378CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Balanoff AM, Smaers JB, Turner AH (2016) Brain modularity across the theropod–bird transition: testing the influence of flight on neuroanatomical variation. J Anat 229:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12403CrossRefPubMed

Barton RA, Purvis A, Harvey PH (1995) Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain system in primates, bats and insectivores. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 348:381–392. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1995.0076CrossRef

Bertrand OC, San Martin-Flores G, Silcox MT (2019) Endocranial shape variation in the squirrel-related clade and their fossil relatives using 3D geometric morphometrics: contributions of locomotion and phylogeny to brain shape. J Zool 308:197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12665CrossRef

Blomberg SP, Garland TJ, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.xCrossRefPubMed

Burghardt GM, Ford NB (1993) Perceptual mechanisms and the behavioral ecology of snakes. Snakes: ecology and behavior. The Blackburn Press, New Jersey, pp 117–164

Camilleri C, Shine R (1990a) Sexual dimorphism and dietary divergence : differences in trophic morphology between male and female snakes. Copeia 1990:649–658CrossRef

Carril J, Tambussi CP, Degrange FJ et al (2016) Comparative brain morphology of Neotropical parrots (Aves, Psittaciformes) inferred from virtual 3D endocasts. J Anat 229:239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12325CrossRefPubMed

Catania KC, Leitch DB, Gauthier D (2010) Function of the appendages in tentacled snakes (Erpeton tentaculatus). J Exp Biol 213:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.039685CrossRefPubMed

Cooper WEJ (2008) Tandem evolution of diet and chemosensory responses in snakes. Amphibia-Reptilia 29:393–398CrossRef

Crowe-Riddell JM, Snelling EP, Watson AP et al (2016) The evolution of scale sensilla in the transition from land to sea in elapid snakes. Open Biol 6:160054. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.160054CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Crowe-Riddell JM, Simões BF, Partridge JC et al (2019) Phototactic tails: evolution and molecular basis of a novel sensory trait in sea snakes. Mol Ecol 28:2013–2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15022CrossRefPubMed

Czaplicki JA, Porter RH (1974) Visual cues mediating the selection of goldfish (Carassius auratus) by two species of Natrix. J Herpetol 8:129–134CrossRef

Da Silva MAO, Heegaard S, Wang T et al (2017) Morphology of the snake spectacle reflects its evolutionary adaptation and development. BMC Vet Res 13:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1193-2CrossRef

Daghfous G, Smargiassi M, Libourel PA et al (2012) The function of oscillatory tongue-flicks in snakes: insights from kinematics of tongue-flicking in the banded water snake (Nerodia fasciata). Chem Senses 37:883–896. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjs072CrossRefPubMed

De Cock BT (1983) Thermal sensitivity as a specialization for prey capture and feeding in snakes. Am Zool 23:363–375CrossRef

Drummond HM (1985) The role of vision in the predatory behaviour of natricine snakes. Anim Behav 33:206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80134-2CrossRef

Ebert J, Westhoff G (2006) Behavioural examination of the infrared sensitivity of rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox). J Comp Physiol A 192:941–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0131-8CrossRef

Ebert J, Müller S, Westhoff G (2007) Behavioural examination of the infrared sensitivity of ball pythons. J Zool 272:340–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00275.xCrossRef

Franz R (1977) Observations on the food, feeding behavior, and parasites of the striped swamp snake, Regina alleni. Herpetologica 33:91–94

Friedel P, Young BA, Van Hemmen JL (2008) Auditory localization of ground-borne vibrations in snakes. Phys Rev Lett 100:048701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.048701CrossRefPubMed

Gunz P, Mitteroecker P (2013) Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces. Hystrix 24:103–109. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-24.1-6292CrossRef

Gutiérrez-Ibáñez C, Iwaniuk AN, Wylie DR (2010) The independent evolution of the enlargement of the principal sensory nucleus of the trigeminal nerve in three different groups of birds. Brain Behav Evol 74:280–294. https://doi.org/10.1159/000270904CrossRef

Halpern M, Kubie JL (1984) The role of the ophidian vomeronasal system in species-typical behavior. Trends Neurosci 7:472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(84)80258-1CrossRef

Hart NS, Coimbra JP, Collin SP, Westhoff G (2012) Photoreceptor types, visual pigments, and topographic specializations in the retinas of Hydrophiid sea snakes. J Comp Neurol 520:1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22784CrossRefPubMed

Heatwole H (1999) Sea snakes. University of New South Wales Press Ltd, Kensington

Hibbard E, Lavergne J (1972) Morphology of the retina of the sea-snake, Pelamis platurus. J Anat 112:125–136PubMedPubMedCentral

Holloway WL, Claeson KM, O’keefe FR (2013) A virtual phytosaur endocast and its implications for sensory system evolution in archosaurs. J Vertebr Paleontol 33:848–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2013.747532CrossRef

Iwaniuk AN (2017) Functional correlates of brain and brain region sizes in nonmammalian vertebrates. In: Kaas JH (ed) Evolution of nervous systems, Academic Press, pp 335–348

Iwaniuk AN, Mardon K, Leseberg NP, Weisbecker V (2020) The endocast of the Night Parrot (Pezoporus occidentalis) reveals insights into its sensory ecology and the evolution of nocturnality in birds. Sci Rep 10(9258):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65156-0CrossRef

Jayne BC, Voris HK, Ng PKL (2002) Snake circumvents constraints on prey size. Nature 418:143CrossRef

Jayne BC, Voris HK, Ng PKL (2018) How big is too big? Using crustacean-eating snakes (Homalopsidae) to test how anatomy and behaviour affect prey size and feeding performance. Biol J Linn Soc 123:636–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly007CrossRef

Kaas JH (2017) Evolution of nervous systems, 2nd edn. Academic Press

Kawabe S, Shimokawa T, Miki H et al (2013) Variation in avian brain shape: relationship with size and orbital shape. J Anat 223:495–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kotrschal K, van Staaden MJ, Huber R (1998) Fish brains: evolution and environmental relationships. Rev Fish Biol Fish 8:373–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008839605380CrossRef

Krochmal AR, Bakken GS, LaDuc TJ (2004) Heat in evolution’s kitchen: evolutionary perspectives on the functions and origin of the facial pit of pitvipers (Viperidae: Crotalinae). J Exp Biol 207:4231–4238. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01278CrossRefPubMed

Kropach CN (1975) The yellow-bellied sea snake, Pelamis, in the eastern Pacific. In: Dunson WA (ed) The biology of sea snakes. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 185–213

Kutsuma R, Sasai T, Kishida T (2018) How snakes find prey underwater: sea snakes use visual and chemical cues for foraging. Zoolog Sci 35:483–486. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs180059CrossRefPubMed

Lautenschlager S, Rayfield EJ, Altangerel P et al (2012) The endocranial anatomy of Therizinosauria and its implications for sensory and cognitive function. PLoS ONE 7:e52289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lebrun R (2017) ISE-MeshTools v1.3.4. pp 1–101

Liu Y, Ding L, Lei J et al (2012) Eye size variation reflects habitat and daily activity patterns in colubrid snakes. J Morphol 273:883–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20028CrossRefPubMed

Macrì S, Savriama Y, Khan I, Di-Poï N (2019) Comparative analysis of squamate brains unveils multi-level variation in cerebellar architecture associated with locomotor specialization. Nat Commun 10:5560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13405-wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mark Waters R, Burghardt GM (2005) The interaction of food motivation and experience in the ontogeny of chemoreception in crayfish snakes. Anim Behav 69:363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.03.014CrossRef

Marugán-Lobón J, Watanabe A, Kawabe S (2016) Studying avian encephalization with geometric morphometrics. J Anat 229:191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moon BR, Penning DA, Segall M, Herrel A (2019) Feeding in snakes: form, function, and evolution of the feeding system. In: Bels V, Whishaw IQ (eds) Feeding in vertebrates: evolution, morphology, behavior, biomechanics. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp 528–574

Naumann RK, Ondracek JM, Reiter S et al (2015) The reptilian brain. Curr Biol 25:R317–R321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.049CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Newman EA, Hartline PH (1982) The infrared “vision” of snakes. Sci Am 246:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0382-116CrossRef

Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C (1998) The central nervous system of vertebrates. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

Noonloy T, Kunya K, Chanhome L et al (2018) Crab-ripping: an unusual feeding behavior newly recorded in freshwater snakes. Bull Chicago Herpetol Soc 53:53–56

Olori JC (2010) Digital endocasts of the cranial cavity and osseous labyrinth of the burrowing snake Uropeltis woodmasoni (Alethinophidia: Uropeltidae). Copeia 2010:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-09-082CrossRef

Pawar S, Dell AI, Savage VM (2012) Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths. Nature 486:485–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11131CrossRefPubMed

Pedersen TL, Crameri F (2020) Package “scico”, pp 1–7

Povel DE, Van Der Kooij J (1997) Scale sensillae of the file snake (Serpentes: Acrochordidae) and some other aquatic and burrowing snakes. Netherlands J Zool 47:443–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CrossRef

Pyron RA, Burbrink FT (2014) Early origin of viviparity and multiple reversions to oviparity in squamate reptiles. Ecol Lett 17:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12168CrossRefPubMed

Randall JA, Matocq MD (1997) Why do kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) footdrum at snakes? Behav Ecol 8:404–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/8.4.404CrossRef

Revell LJ (2012) Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things), pp 217–223

Ripley B, Venables W (2020) Package ‘class’, pp 1–19

Schaeffel F, de Queiroz A (1990) Alternative mechanisms of enhanced underwater vision in the garter snakes Thamnophis melanogaster and T. couchii. Copeia 1990:50–58CrossRef

Schaeffel F, Mathis U (1991) Underwater vision in semi-aquatic European snakes. Naturwissenschaften 78:373–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131614CrossRef

Schlager S (2017) Morpho and Rvcg–Shape analysis in R: R-Packages for geometric morphometrics, shape analysis and surface manipulations. In: Zheng G, Li S, Szekely G (eds) Statistical shape and deformation analysis: methods implementation and applications. Academic Press, pp 217–256CrossRef

Schott RK, Van Nynatten A, Card DC et al (2018) Shifts in selective pressures on snake phototransduction genes associated with photoreceptor transmutation and dim-light ancestry. Mol Biol Evol 35:1376–1389. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy025/4904158CrossRefPubMed

Schwenk K (2008) Comparative anatomy and physiology of chemical senses in nonavian aquatic reptiles. In: Thewissen JGM, Nummela S (eds) Sensory evolution on the threshold adaptations in secondarily aquatic vertebrates. University of California Press, pp 65–81

Sepulcre J, Liu H, Talukdar T et al (2010) The organization of local and distant functional connectivity in the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 6:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000808CrossRef

Shine R (2005) All at sea: Aquatic life modifies mate-recognition modalities in sea snakes (Emydocephalus annulatus, Hydrophiidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:591–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0897-zCrossRef

Shine R, Bonnet X, Elphick MJ, Barrott EG (2004a) A novel foraging mode in snakes: browsing by the sea snake Emydocephalus annulatus (Serpentes, Hydrophiidae). Funct Ecol 18:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2004.00803.xCrossRef

Shine R, Brown GP, Elphick MJ (2004b) Field experiments on foraging in free-ranging water snakes Enhydris polylepis (Homalopsinae). Anim Behav 68:1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.03.004CrossRef

Simões BF, Sampaio FL, Douglas RH et al (2016) Visual pigments, ocular filters and the evolution of snake vision. Mol Biol Evol 33:2483–2495. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw148CrossRefPubMed

Simões BF, Gower DJ, Rasmussen AR et al (2020) Spectral diversification and trans-species allelic polymorphism during the land-to-sea transition in snakes. Curr Biol 30:2608–2615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.061CrossRefPubMed

Skinner M, Miller N (2020) Aggregation and social interaction in garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74:51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-2827-0CrossRef

Smargiassi M, Daghfous G, Leroy B et al (2012) Chemical basis of prey recognition in Thamnophiine snakes: the unexpected new roles of parvalbumins. PLoS ONE 7:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039560CrossRef

Starck D (1979) Cranio-cerebral relations in recent reptiles. Biology of the reptilia, 9 neurology A. Academic Press Inc. Ltd, London, pp 1–38

Stevens M (2013) Sensory ecology, behavior, and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

Thewissen JGM, Nummela S (2008) Sensory evolution on the threshold: adaptations in secondarily aquatic vertebrates. University of California Press, LondonCrossRef

Vincent SE, Shine R, Brown GP (2005) Does foraging mode influence sensory modalities for prey detection in male and female filesnakes, Acrochordus arafurae? Anim Behav 70:715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.002CrossRef

Voris HK, Voris HH, Liat LB (1978) The food and feeding behavior of a marine snake, Enhydrina schistosa (Hydrophiidae). Copeia 1978:134–146CrossRef

Weisbecker V, Rowe T, Wroe S et al (2021) Global elongation and high shape flexibility as an evolutionary hypothesis of accommodating mammalian brains into skulls. Evolution (n Y) 75:625–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14163CrossRef

Westhoff G, Fry BG, Bleckmann H (2005) Sea snakes (Lapemis curtus) are sensitive to low-amplitude water motions. Zoology 108:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2005.07.001CrossRefPubMed

Yopak KE, Pakan JMP, Wylie D (2017) The cerebellum of nonmammalian vertebrates. In: Evolution of nervous systems, 2nd edn, Elsevier, pp 373–385

Young BA (2003) Snake bioacoustics: toward a richer understanding of the behavioral ecology of snakes. Q Rev Biol 78:303–325. https://doi.org/10.1360/zd-2013-43-6-1064CrossRefPubMed

Young BA (2007) Response of the yellow anaconda (Eunectes notaeus) to aquatic acoustic stimuli. In: Henderson RW, Powell R (eds) Biology of the boas and pythons. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Utah, pp 199–205

Young BA, Aguiar A, Lillywhite HB (2008) Foraging cues used by insular Florida cottonmouths, Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti. South Am J Herpetol 3:135–144. https://doi.org/10.2994/1808-9798(2008)3[135:fcubif]2.0.co;2CrossRef

Title: Inside the head of snakes: influence of size, phylogeny, and sensory ecology on endocranium morphology
Authors: Marion Segall
Raphaël Cornette
Arne R. Rasmussen
Christopher J. Raxworthy
Publication date: 01-09-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Brain Structure and Function / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02340-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Inside the head of snakes: influence of size, phylogeny, and sensory ecology on endocranium morphology

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Coherence and cognition in the cortex: the fundamental role of parvalbumin, myelin, and the perineuronal net

Increased mGlu5 mRNA expression in BLA glutamate neurons facilitates resilience to the long-term effects of a single predator scent stress exposure

Distribution of two isoforms of tryptophan hydroxylase in the brain of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). An in situ hybridization study

Anatomy and histology of the Göttingen minipig adenohypophysis with special emphasis on the polypeptide hormones: GH, PRL, and ACTH

Neural encoding and functional interactions underlying pantomimed movements

The MRi-Share database: brain imaging in a cross-sectional cohort of 1870 university students