Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-11-2020 | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Original Article

The role of the l-IPS in the comprehension of reversible and irreversible sentences: an rTMS study

Authors: Lorenzo Vercesi, Prerana Sabnis, Chiara Finocchiaro, Luigi Cattaneo, Elena Tonolli, Gabriele Miceli

Published in: Brain Structure and Function | Issue 8/2020

Abstract

Thematic roles can be seen as semantic labels assigned to who/what is taking part in the event denoted by a verb. Encoding thematic relations is crucial for sentence interpretation since it relies on both syntactic and semantic aspects. In previous studies, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left inferior intraparietal sulcus (l-IPS) selectively influenced performance accuracy on reversible passive (but not active) sentences. The effect was attributed to the fact that in these sentences the assignment of the agent and theme roles requires re-analysis of the first-pass sentence parsing.

To evaluate the role of reversibility and non-canonical word order (passive voice) on the effect, rTMS was applied over l-IPS during a sentence comprehension task that included reversible and irreversible, active and passive sentences. Participants were asked to identify who/what was performing the action or who/what the action was being performed on.

Stimulation of the l-IPS increased response time on reversible passive sentences but not on reversible active sentences. Importantly, no effect was found on irreversible sentences, irrespective of sentence diathesis.

Results suggest that neither reversibility nor sentence diathesis alone are responsible for the effect and that the effect is likely to be triggered/constrained by a combination of semantic reversibility and non-canonical word order. Combined with the results of previous studies, and irrespective of the specific role of each feature, these findings support the view that the l-IPS is critically involved in the assignment of thematic roles in reversible sentences.

Baldo JV, Dronkers NF (2006) The role of inferior parietal and inferior frontal cortex in working memory. Neuropsychology 20:529–538CrossRef

Bates E, Wilson SM, Saygin AP, Dick F, Sereno MI, Knight RT et al (2003) Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping. Nat Neurosci 6:448–450CrossRef

Bertinetto PM, Burani C, Laudanna A, Marconi L, Ratti D, Rolando C, Thornton AM (2005) Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell'Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS))

Bresnan J (2000) Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

Brookshire RH, Nicholas LE (1980) Verification of active and passive sentences by aphasic and nonaphasic subjects. J Speech Hear Res 23:878–893CrossRef

Caplan D, Futter C (1986) Assignment of thematic roles by an agrammatic aphasic patient. Brain Lang 27:117–135CrossRef

Caplan D, Waters G, Kennedy D, Alpert N, Makris N, DeDe G et al (2007) A study of syntactic processing in aphasia II: neurological aspects. Brain Lang 101:151–177CrossRef

Caplan D, Michaud J, Hufford R, Makris N (2015) Deficit-lesion correlations in syntactic comprehension in aphasia. Brain Lang 152:14–27CrossRef

Caramazza A, Miceli G (1991) Selective impairment of thematic role assignment in sentence processing. Brain Lang 41:402–436CrossRef

Caramazza A, Zurif E (1976) Dissociations of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang 3:572–582CrossRef

Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

Chomsky N (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

Dronkers NF, Wilkins DP, Van Valin RD Jr, Redfern BB, Jaeger JJ (2004) Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition 92:145–177CrossRef

Ferreira F (2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cogn Psychol 47:164–203CrossRef

Finocchiaro C, Capasso R, Cattaneo L, Zuanazzi A, Miceli G (2015) Thematic role assignment in the posterior parietal cortex: a tms study. Neuropsychologia 77:223–232CrossRef

Gallucci M (2019) General analyses for linear models (GAMLj). Retrieved from: https://gamlj.github.io/

Grodzinsky Y (2000) The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behav Brain Sci 23:1–21CrossRef

Henson RN, Burgess N, Frith CD (2000) Recoding, storage, rehearsal and grouping in verbal short-term memory: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 38:426–440CrossRef

Keller T, Carpenter P, Just MA (2001) The neural bases of sentence comprehension: an fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cereb Cortex 11:223–237CrossRef

Kirby S (2010) Passives in first language acquisition: What causes the delay? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16(1). https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol16/iss1/13. Accessed 19 Mar 2010

Love T, Swinney D, Walenski M, Zurif E (2008) How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang 107:203–219CrossRef

Martin RC, Blossom-Stach C (1986) Evidence of syntactic deficits in a fluent aphasic. Brain Lang 28:196–234CrossRef

Martin A, Schurz M, Kronbichler M, Richlan F (2015) Reading in the brain of children and adults: a meta-analysis of 40 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 36:1963–1981CrossRef

Meyer L, Friederici AD (2015) Neural systems underlying the processing of complex sentences. In: Hickok G, Small S (eds) Neurobiology of language. Academic Press, Amsterdam (The Netherlands) and Boston (Massachusetts), pp 597–606

Meyer AM, Mack JE, Thompson CK (2012) Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia. J Neurolinguist 25:31–43CrossRef

Mirman D, Graziano KM (2012) Damage to temporo-parietal cortex decreases incidental activation of thematic relations during spoken word comprehension. Neuropsychologia 50:1990–1997CrossRef

Papagno C, Cecchetto C, Reati F, Bello L (2007) Processing of syntactically complex sentences relies on verbal short-term memory: evidence from a short-term memory patient. Cogn Neuropsychol 24:292–311CrossRef

Pollard C, Sag IA (1994) Head-driven phrase structure grammar. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA

Richardson FM, Thomas MSC, Price CJ (2010) Neuronal activation for semantically reversible sentences. J Cogn Neurosci 22:1283–1298CrossRef

Rodd JM, Vitello S, Woollams AM, Adank P (2015) Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Brain Lang 141:89–102CrossRef

Rogalsky C, LaCroix AN, Chen KH, Anderson SW (2018) The neurobiology of agrammatic sentence comprehension: a lesion study. J Cogn Neurosci 30:234–255CrossRef

Romero L, Walsh V, Papagno C (2006) The neural correlates of phonological short-term memory: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cogn Neurosci 18:1147–1155CrossRef

Romero Lauro LJ, Reis J, Cohen LG, Cecchetto C, Papagno C (2010) A case for the involvement of phonological loop in sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia 48(14):4003–4011CrossRef

Thompson CK, Choy JJ (2009) Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: evidence from eye movements. J Psycholinguist Res 38:255–283CrossRef

Thothathiri M, Kimberg DY, Schwartz MF (2012) The neural basis of reversible sentence comprehension: evidence from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping in aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci 24:212–222CrossRef

Walenski M, Europa E, Caplan D, Thompson CK (2019) Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: an ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 39:1–30

Wang J, Cherkassky VL, Yang Y, Chang KK, Vargas R, Diana N, Just MA (2016) Identifying thematic roles from neural representations measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Neuropsychol 33:257–264CrossRef

Wu DH, Waller S, Chatterjee A (2007) The functional neuroanatomy of thematic role and locative relational knowledge. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1542–1555CrossRef

Title: The role of the l-IPS in the comprehension of reversible and irreversible sentences: an rTMS study
Authors: Lorenzo Vercesi
Prerana Sabnis
Chiara Finocchiaro
Luigi Cattaneo
Elena Tonolli
Gabriele Miceli
Publication date: 01-11-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published in: Brain Structure and Function / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02130-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

The role of the l-IPS in the comprehension of reversible and irreversible sentences: an rTMS study

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Chemical-neuroanatomical organization of peripheral sensory-efferent systems in the pond snail (Lymnaea stagnalis)

Reproducing macaque lateral grasping and oculomotor networks using resting state functional connectivity and diffusion tractography

Non-classical behavior of the default mode network regions during an information processing task

Network-behavior mapping of lasting executive impairments after low-grade glioma surgery

Changes in auditory cortical thickness following music training in children: converging longitudinal and cross-sectional results

Abnormal dynamic resting-state brain network organization in auditory verbal hallucination