Top

Published in:

01-05-2018 | Original Article

Neurophysiological variability masks differences in functional neuroanatomical networks and their effectiveness to modulate response inhibition between children and adults

Authors: Benjamin Bodmer, Moritz Mückschel, Veit Roessner, Christian Beste

Published in: Brain Structure and Function | Issue 4/2018

Abstract

Executive functions are well-known to undergo developmental changes from childhood to adulthood. Considerable efforts have been made to elucidate the affected system neurophysiological mechanisms. But while it is well-known that developmental changes affect intra-individual variability, this potential bias has largely been neglected when investigating the neurophysiology underlying developmental differences between children and adults. We hypothesize that due to differences in intra-individual variability of neural processes between children and adults, reliable group differences will only be evident after accounting for intra-individual variability in neurophysiological processes. We, therefore, investigate response-inhibition processes as an important instance of executive control in children (between 10 and 14 years) and adults (between 20 and 29 years) and decompose EEG data on the basis of the latency and temporal variability. This was combined with source localization. Children showed more impulsive behavior than adults. Importantly, a reliable match between the neurophysiological and behavioral data could only be found when accounting for intra-individual variability in the EEG data. These decomposed data showed that children and adults use similar neurophysiological mechanisms at the response selection level to accomplish inhibitory control, but seem to engage different neuroanatomical structures to do so according to source localization results: In adults, these processes were related to the medial frontal cortex. In children, the same processes were reflected in a shift of the scalp topography and related to the superior parietal cortex. These shifts in neural networks were associated with lower effectiveness in exerting inhibitory control. However, these differences in the functional neuroanatomical architecture can only be seen when intra-individual variability is taken into account.

Barber AD, Caffo BS, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH (2013a) Developmental changes in within- and between-network connectivity between late childhood and adulthood. Neuropsychologia 51:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.011 CrossRefPubMed

Barber AD, Caffo BS, Pekar JJ, Mostofsky SH (2013b) Effects of working memory demand on neural mechanisms of motor response selection and control. J Cogn Neurosci 25:1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bari A, Robbins TW (2013) Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol 108:44–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 CrossRefPubMed

Beste C, Dziobek I, Hielscher H et al (2009) Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci 29:855–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06621.x CrossRefPubMed

Beste C, Willemssen R, Saft C, Falkenstein M (2010) Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: basal ganglia disease effects. Neuropsychologia 48:366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.023 CrossRefPubMed

Beste C, Ness V, Falkenstein M, Saft C (2011) On the role of fronto-striatal neural synchronization processes for response inhibition–evidence from ERP phase-synchronization analyses in pre-manifest Huntington’s disease gene mutation carriers. Neuropsychologia 49:3484–3493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.024 CrossRefPubMed

Bielak AAM, Cherbuin N, Bunce D, Anstey KJ (2014) Intraindividual variability is a fundamental phenomenon of aging: evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study across young, middle, and older adulthood. Dev Psychol 50:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032650 CrossRefPubMed

Bluschke A, Broschwitz F, Kohl S et al (2016a) The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback. Sci Rep 6:31178. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31178 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bluschke A, Roessner V, Beste C (2016b) Specific cognitive-neurophysiological processes predict impulsivity in the childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined subtype. Psychol Med 46:1277–1287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715002822 CrossRefPubMed

Bodmer B, Beste C (2017) On the dependence of response inhibition processes on sensory modality. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1941–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23495 CrossRefPubMed

Bonnefond A, Doignon-Camus N, Touzalin-Chretien P, Dufour A (2010) Vigilance and intrinsic maintenance of alert state: an ERP study. Behav Brain Res 211:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.030 CrossRefPubMed

Brandeis D, van Leeuwen TH, Rubia K et al (1998) Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attention deficits. Behav Brain Res 94:111–125CrossRefPubMed

Cauller LJ, Kulics AT (1991) The neural basis of the behaviorally relevant N1 component of the somatosensory-evoked potential in SI cortex of awake monkeys: evidence that backward cortical projections signal conscious touch sensation. Exp Brain Res 84:607–619CrossRefPubMed

Chmielewski WX, Beste C (2015) Action control processes in autism spectrum disorder–insights from a neurobiological and neuroanatomical perspective. Prog Neurobiol 124:49–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.11.002 CrossRefPubMed

Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C (2015a) Concurrent information affects response inhibition processes via the modulation of theta oscillations in cognitive control networks. Brain Struct Funct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1137-1

Chmielewski WX, Roessner V, Beste C (2015b) Predictability and context determine differences in conflict monitoring between adolescence and adulthood. Behav Brain Res 292:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.054 CrossRefPubMed

Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64:135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 CrossRefPubMed

Dippel G, Beste C (2015) A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour. Nat Commun 6:6587. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7587 CrossRefPubMed

Dippel G, Chmielewski W, Mückschel M, Beste C (2015) Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study. Brain Struct Funct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1148-y

Fair DA, Cohen AL, Power JD et al (2009) Functional brain networks develop from a “local to distributed” organization. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000381 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fan L-Y, Gau SS-F, Chou T-L (2014) Neural correlates of inhibitory control and visual processing in youths with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a counting Stroop functional MRI study. Psychol Med 44:2661–2671. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714000038 CrossRefPubMed

Fitzgerald KD, Zbrozek CD, Welsh RC et al (2008) Pilot study of response inhibition and error processing in the posterior medial prefrontal cortex in healthy youth. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49:986–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01906.x CrossRefPubMed

Fokin VA, Shelepin YE, Kharauzov AK et al (2008) Localization of human cortical areas activated on perception of ordered and chaotic images. Neurosci Behav Physiol 38:677–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-008-9033-2 CrossRefPubMed

Fuchs M, Kastner J, Wagner M et al (2002) A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 113:702–712CrossRef

Garrett DD, Macdonald SWS, Craik FIM (2012) Intraindividual reaction time variability is malleable: feedback- and education-related reductions in variability with age. Front Hum Neurosci 6:101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00101 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Garrett DD, Samanez-Larkin GR, MacDonald SWS et al (2013) Moment-to-moment brain signal variability: a next frontier in human brain mapping? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:610–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Giorgio A, Santelli L, Tomassini V et al (2010) Age-related changes in grey and white matter structure throughout adulthood. NeuroImage 51:943–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L et al (2004) Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8174–8179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hämmerer D, Li S-C, Müller V, Lindenberger U (2010) An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression. Neuropsychologia 48:3305–3316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.014 CrossRefPubMed

Hämmerer D, Müller V, Li S-C (2014) Performance monitoring across the lifespan: Still maturing post-conflict regulation in children and declining task-set monitoring in older adults. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.008 PubMed

Herrmann CS, Knight RT (2001) Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:465–476CrossRefPubMed

Huster RJ, Enriquez-Geppert S, Lavallee CF et al (2013) Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 87:217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001

Johnstone SJ, Dimoska A, Smith JL et al (2007) The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7–12 years: performance and event-related potential indices. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 63:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.001

Jonkman LM (2006) The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study. Brain Res 1097:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064 CrossRefPubMed

Jonkman LM, Sniedt FLF, Kemner C (2007) Source localization of the Nogo-N2: a developmental study. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 118:1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.017 CrossRef

Lehto JE, Juujärvi P, Kooistra L, Pulkkinen L (2003) Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. Br J Dev Psychol 21:59–80. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003321164627 CrossRef

Lewis MD, Lamm C, Segalowitz SJ et al (2006) Neurophysiological correlates of emotion regulation in children and adolescents. J Cogn Neurosci 18:430–443. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892906775990633 CrossRefPubMed

Liu Z-X, Woltering S, Lewis MD (2014) Developmental change in EEG theta activity in the medial prefrontal cortex during response control. NeuroImage 85 Pt 2:873–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.054 CrossRef

Marco-Pallarés J, Grau C, Ruffini G (2005) Combined ICA-LORETA analysis of mismatch negativity. NeuroImage 25:471–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.028 CrossRefPubMed

Mella N, Fagot D, Lecerf T, de Ribaupierre A (2015) Working memory and intraindividual variability in processing speed: a lifespan developmental and individual-differences study. Mem Cognit 43:340–356. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0491-1 CrossRefPubMed

Mella N, Fagot D, de Ribaupierre A (2016) Dispersion in cognitive functioning: Age differences over the lifespan. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 38:111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2015.1089979 CrossRefPubMed

Migliorini R, Moore EM, Glass L et al (2015) Anterior cingulate cortex surface area relates to behavioral inhibition in adolescents with and without heavy prenatal alcohol exposure. Behav Brain Res 292:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.037 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mückschel M, Stock A-K, Beste C (2014) Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. Cereb Cortex 1991 24:2120–2129. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht066 CrossRefPubMed

Mückschel M, Chmielewski W, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2017) The norepinephrine system shows information-content specific properties during cognitive control - Evidence from EEG and pupillary responses. NeuroImage 149:44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.036 CrossRefPubMed

Nunez PL, Pilgreen KL (1991) The spline-Laplacian in clinical neurophysiology: a method to improve EEG spatial resolution. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 8:397–413

Ocklenburg S, Güntürkün O, Beste C (2011) Lateralized neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes. NeuroImage 55:1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.035 CrossRefPubMed

Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefPubMed

Ouyang G, Herzmann G, Zhou C, Sommer W (2011) Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. Psychophysiology 48:1631–1647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01269.x CrossRefPubMed

Ouyang G, Schacht A, Zhou C, Sommer W (2013) Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments. Psychophysiology 50:253–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12004 CrossRefPubMed

Ouyang G, Sommer W, Zhou C (2015a) A toolbox for residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)--A method for the decomposition, reconstruction, and single trial analysis of event related potentials. J Neurosci Methods 250:7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.10.009 CrossRefPubMed

Ouyang G, Sommer W, Zhou C (2015b) Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). Psychophysiology 52:839–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12411 CrossRefPubMed

Ouyang G, Hildebrandt A, Sommer W, Zhou C (2017) Exploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: a review and comparative evaluation of methods. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 75:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.023 CrossRefPubMed

Pascual-Marqui RD (2002) Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24(Suppl D):5–12PubMed

Rubia K, Smith AB, Woolley J et al (2006) Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control. Hum Brain Mapp 27:973–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20237 CrossRefPubMed

Rubia K, Smith AB, Taylor E, Brammer M (2007) Linear age-correlated functional development of right inferior fronto-striato-cerebellar networks during response inhibition and anterior cingulate during error-related processes. Hum Brain Mapp 28:1163–1177. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20347 CrossRefPubMed

Sekihara K, Sahani M, Nagarajan SS (2005) Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. NeuroImage 25:1056–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.051 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2004) Inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 115:1320–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.027 CrossRef

Sowell ER, Peterson BS, Thompson PM et al (2003) Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nat Neurosci 6:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1008 CrossRefPubMed

Staub B, Doignon-Camus N, Bacon É, Bonnefond A (2014) The effects of aging on sustained attention ability: an ERP study. Psychol Aging 29:684–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037067 CrossRefPubMed

Stock A-K, Popescu F, Neuhaus AH, Beste C (2015) Single-subject prediction of response inhibition behavior by event-related potentials. J Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00969.2015 00969.2015.PubMedPubMedCentral

Störmer V, Eppinger B, Li S-C (2014) Reward speeds up and increases consistency of visual selective attention: a lifespan comparison. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 14:659–671. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0273-z CrossRefPubMed

Takeichi H, Koyama S, Terao A et al (2010) Comprehension of degraded speech sounds with m-sequence modulation: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 49:2697–2706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.063 CrossRefPubMed

Tamnes CK, Fjell AM, Westlye LT et al (2012) Becoming consistent: developmental reductions in intraindividual variability in reaction time are related to white matter integrity. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 32:972–982. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4779-11.2012 CrossRef

Taylor S, McLean B, Falkmer T et al (2016) Does somatosensation change with age in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12375

Verleger R, Metzner MF, Ouyang G et al (2014) Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). NeuroImage 100:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.036 CrossRefPubMed

Vidal J, Mills T, Pang EW, Taylor MJ (2012) Response inhibition in adults and teenagers: spatiotemporal differences in the prefrontal cortex. Brain Cogn 79:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.011 CrossRefPubMed

Wessel JR, Aron AR (2015) It’s not too late: the onset of the frontocentral P3 indexes successful response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Psychophysiology 52:472–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12374 CrossRefPubMed

Wolff N, Mückschel M, Beste C (2017) Neural mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical networks during memory and cue-based task switching as revealed by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) based source localization. Brain Struct Funct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1437-8

Woltering S, Liu Z, Rokeach A, Tannock R (2013) Neurophysiological differences in inhibitory control between adults with ADHD and their peers. Neuropsychologia 51:1888–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.023 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Neurophysiological variability masks differences in functional neuroanatomical networks and their effectiveness to modulate response inhibition between children and adults
Authors: Benjamin Bodmer
Moritz Mückschel
Veit Roessner
Christian Beste
Publication date: 01-05-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Brain Structure and Function / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1589-6

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Neurophysiological variability masks differences in functional neuroanatomical networks and their effectiveness to modulate response inhibition between children and adults

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Translaminar circuits formed by the pyramidal cells in the superficial layers of cat visual cortex

Adolescent cocaine exposure induces prolonged synaptic modifications in medial prefrontal cortex of adult rats

Neural circuits underlying jaw movements for the prey-catching behavior in frog: distribution of vestibular afferent terminals on motoneurons supplying the jaw

A postmortem stereological study of the amygdala in Williams syndrome

Diffusion tractography reveals pervasive asymmetry of cerebral white matter tracts in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)

Organization of auditory areas in the superior temporal gyrus of marmoset monkeys revealed by real-time optical imaging