Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Brain Structure and Function 8/2017

01-11-2017 | Original Article

The angular gyrus is a supramodal comparator area in action–outcome monitoring

Authors: Bianca M. van Kemenade, B. Ezgi Arikan, Tilo Kircher, Benjamin Straube

Published in: Brain Structure and Function | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Predicting and processing the sensory consequences of one’s own actions is essential to enable successful interactions with the environment. Previous studies have suggested that the angular gyrus detects discrepancies between predicted and actual action consequences, at least for unimodal feedback. However, most actions lead to multisensory consequences, raising the question whether previous models can sufficiently explain action–outcome processing. Here, we investigated neural comparator processes during detection of delays between action and unimodal or bimodal consequences in human subjects with fMRI, using parametric and connectivity analyses. Participants had to perform button presses, which led to the presentation of either a dot on the screen, a tone, or both, presented with a variable delay after the button press. Participants were asked to judge whether there was a delay between action and feedback. Activity in the angular gyrus correlated positively with delay for both visual, auditory, and audio-visual action consequences. Furthermore, the angular gyrus was functionally connected with midline structures such as the posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus in all conditions. Our results show that the angular gyrus is (1) a supramodal area, sensitive to delays in multiple modalities, and (2) functionally connected with self-referential areas during delay detection of both unimodal and bimodal action consequences. Overall, our results suggest that the angular gyrus functions as a mediator between perception and interpretation, and that this process is remarkably similar for unimodal and bimodal action consequences.
Literature
go back to reference Blakemore S, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (1999) The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during self-produced tactile stimulation. NeuroImage 10:448–459CrossRefPubMed Blakemore S, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (1999) The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during self-produced tactile stimulation. NeuroImage 10:448–459CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Blakemore S, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2001) The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. NeuroReport 12(9):1879–1884CrossRefPubMed Blakemore S, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2001) The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. NeuroReport 12(9):1879–1884CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cabanis M, Pyka M, Mehl S, Müller BW, Loos-jankowiak S, Winterer G et al (2013) The precuneus and the insula in self-attributional processes. Cognitive Affect Behav Neurosci 13:330–345. doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0143-5 CrossRef Cabanis M, Pyka M, Mehl S, Müller BW, Loos-jankowiak S, Winterer G et al (2013) The precuneus and the insula in self-attributional processes. Cognitive Affect Behav Neurosci 13:330–345. doi:10.​3758/​s13415-012-0143-5 CrossRef
go back to reference Frund I, Haenel NV, Wichmann FA (2011) Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. J Vis 11(6):16CrossRefPubMed Frund I, Haenel NV, Wichmann FA (2011) Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. J Vis 11(6):16CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kircher TTJ, Brammer M, Bullmore E, Simmons A, Bartels M, David AS (2002) The neural correlates of intentional and incidental self processing. Neuropsychologia 40:683–692CrossRefPubMed Kircher TTJ, Brammer M, Bullmore E, Simmons A, Bartels M, David AS (2002) The neural correlates of intentional and incidental self processing. Neuropsychologia 40:683–692CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, Wallace MT, Yen Y-F, Field AS, Stein BE (2002) Deactivation of sensory-specific cortex by cross-modal stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 14(3):420–429CrossRefPubMed Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, Wallace MT, Yen Y-F, Field AS, Stein BE (2002) Deactivation of sensory-specific cortex by cross-modal stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 14(3):420–429CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mozolic JL, Joyner D, Hugenschmidt CE, Peiffer AM, Kraft RA, Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ (2008) Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention. BMC Neurol 8:35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mozolic JL, Joyner D, Hugenschmidt CE, Peiffer AM, Kraft RA, Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ (2008) Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention. BMC Neurol 8:35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, Poline JB (2005) Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. NeuroImage 25:653–660CrossRefPubMed Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, Poline JB (2005) Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. NeuroImage 25:653–660CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sperry RW (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43:482–489CrossRefPubMed Sperry RW (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43:482–489CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N et al (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 289:273–289. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 CrossRef Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N et al (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 289:273–289. doi:10.​1006/​nimg.​2001.​0978 CrossRef
go back to reference van Kemenade BM, Arikan BE, Kircher T, Straube B (2016) Predicting the sensory consequences of one’s own action: first evidence for multisensory facilitation. Atten Percept Psychophys. doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1189-1 PubMed van Kemenade BM, Arikan BE, Kircher T, Straube B (2016) Predicting the sensory consequences of one’s own action: first evidence for multisensory facilitation. Atten Percept Psychophys. doi:10.​3758/​s13414-016-1189-1 PubMed
go back to reference von Holst E, Mittelstaedt H (1950) Das reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 37:464–476 [Translation of title: The principle of reafference] CrossRef von Holst E, Mittelstaedt H (1950) Das reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften 37:464–476 [Translation of title: The principle of reafference] CrossRef
go back to reference Vroomen J, Keetels M (2010) Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(4):871–884CrossRefPubMed Vroomen J, Keetels M (2010) Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(4):871–884CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolpert DM, Goodbody SJ, Husain M (1998) Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1(6):529–533CrossRefPubMed Wolpert DM, Goodbody SJ, Husain M (1998) Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1(6):529–533CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The angular gyrus is a supramodal comparator area in action–outcome monitoring
Authors
Bianca M. van Kemenade
B. Ezgi Arikan
Tilo Kircher
Benjamin Straube
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Brain Structure and Function / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1428-9

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Brain Structure and Function 8/2017 Go to the issue