Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 5/2019

01-05-2019 | Rectal Cancer | Original Article

National multicentric evaluation of quality of pathology reports for rectal cancer in France in 2016

Authors: C. Boutanos, M. Capdepont, M. Svrcek, F. Thélu, N. Guedj, F. Poizat, F. Bibeau, B. Turlin, A. Rousseau, A. Bardier, J. Selves, M. Desrousseaux, F. Le Pessot, B. Bonhomme, M.-H. Laverrière, C. Julié, R.-P. Eyremandi, S. Stanislas, C. Bazille, A. Daubech, T. Lazure, M.-S. Bordier, A. Demoures, Anne Rullier

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The quality of pathologic assessment of rectal cancer specimens is crucial for treatment efficiency and survival. The Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) recommends evaluating the quality of the pathology report in routine practice using three quality indicators (QIs): the number of lymph nodes (LNs) analyzed (≥ 12), the rate of venous invasion (VI ≥ 30%), and peritoneal involvement (pT4a ≥ 10%). In this study, we evaluated the three QIs of the French national pathology reports and compared them with British guidelines and assessed the influence of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on QIs. From January 1 to December 31, 2016, all pathology reports for rectal adenocarcinoma were collected from French departments. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy included long-course radiotherapy with concomitant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. A total of 983 rectal cancer pathology reports were evaluated. A median of 15 LNs were analyzed and 81% of centers had ≥ 12 LNs. The rate of VI was 30% and 41% of centers had ≥ 30% VI. The rate of pT4a was 4% and 18% of centers reported ≥ 10% pT4a. None of the centers reached the threshold for the three QIs. All three QIs were lower after radiochemotherapy compared to surgery alone. In conclusion, in French routine practice, the values of two of the three QIs (LNs analyzed and VI) were globally in line with RCP guidelines. However, the rate of pT4a was very low, particularly after radiochemotherapy, suggesting its low value in rectal cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Bridoux V, de Chaisemartin C, Beyer L, Goasguen N, Sabbagh C, Guedj N, Dartigues P, Bardier A (2016) Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Cancer du rectum. Question 2: Quels sont les critères de qualité de l'exérèse chirurgicale ? Côlon and Rectum 10:12–27 Bridoux V, de Chaisemartin C, Beyer L, Goasguen N, Sabbagh C, Guedj N, Dartigues P, Bardier A (2016) Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Cancer du rectum. Question 2: Quels sont les critères de qualité de l'exérèse chirurgicale ? Côlon and Rectum 10:12–27
9.
go back to reference Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekinf C (eds) (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekinf C (eds) (2017) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
13.
go back to reference Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB (1997) The prognostic importance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology 112:1096–1102CrossRefPubMed Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB (1997) The prognostic importance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology 112:1096–1102CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lefevre JH, Mineur L, Kotti S, Rullier E, Rouanet P, de Chaisemartin C, Meunier B, Mehrdad J, Cotte E, Desrame J, Karoui M, Benoist S, Kirzin S, Berger A, Panis Y, Piessen G, Saudemont A, Prudhomme M, Peschaud F, Dubois A, Loriau J, Tuech JJ, Meurette G, Lupinacci R, Goasgen N, Parc Y, Simon T, Tiret E (2016) Effect of interval (7 or 11 weeks) between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery on complete pathologic response in rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (GRECCAR-6). J Clin Oncol 34:3773–3780. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6049 CrossRefPubMed Lefevre JH, Mineur L, Kotti S, Rullier E, Rouanet P, de Chaisemartin C, Meunier B, Mehrdad J, Cotte E, Desrame J, Karoui M, Benoist S, Kirzin S, Berger A, Panis Y, Piessen G, Saudemont A, Prudhomme M, Peschaud F, Dubois A, Loriau J, Tuech JJ, Meurette G, Lupinacci R, Goasgen N, Parc Y, Simon T, Tiret E (2016) Effect of interval (7 or 11 weeks) between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgery on complete pathologic response in rectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (GRECCAR-6). J Clin Oncol 34:3773–3780. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2016.​67.​6049 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (eds) (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekind C (eds) (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
17.
go back to reference Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Color Dis 12:19–23CrossRef Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Color Dis 12:19–23CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Quirke P (2003) Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet Oncol 4:695–702 Quirke P (2003) Training and quality assurance for rectal cancer: 20 years of data is enough. Lancet Oncol 4:695–702
24.
go back to reference Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M, Vendrely V, Belleannée G, Bioulac-Sage P, Rullier E (2008) Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival. Am J Surg Pathol 32:45–50CrossRefPubMed Rullier A, Laurent C, Capdepont M, Vendrely V, Belleannée G, Bioulac-Sage P, Rullier E (2008) Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival. Am J Surg Pathol 32:45–50CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rullier A, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Jarlier M, Bibeau F, Chassagne-Clément C, Hennequin C, Tisseau L, Leroux A, Ettore F, Peoc’h M, Diebold MA, Robin YM, Kleinclaus I, Mineur L, Petitjean C, Mosnier JF, Soubeyran I, Padilla N, Lemaistre AI, Bérille J, Denis B, Conroy T, Gérard JP (2013) Predictive factors of positive circumferential resection margin after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: the French randomised trial ACCORD12/0405 PRODIGE 2. Eur J Cancer 49:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.06.028 CrossRefPubMed Rullier A, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Jarlier M, Bibeau F, Chassagne-Clément C, Hennequin C, Tisseau L, Leroux A, Ettore F, Peoc’h M, Diebold MA, Robin YM, Kleinclaus I, Mineur L, Petitjean C, Mosnier JF, Soubeyran I, Padilla N, Lemaistre AI, Bérille J, Denis B, Conroy T, Gérard JP (2013) Predictive factors of positive circumferential resection margin after radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: the French randomised trial ACCORD12/0405 PRODIGE 2. Eur J Cancer 49:82–89. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2012.​06.​028 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
National multicentric evaluation of quality of pathology reports for rectal cancer in France in 2016
Authors
C. Boutanos
M. Capdepont
M. Svrcek
F. Thélu
N. Guedj
F. Poizat
F. Bibeau
B. Turlin
A. Rousseau
A. Bardier
J. Selves
M. Desrousseaux
F. Le Pessot
B. Bonhomme
M.-H. Laverrière
C. Julié
R.-P. Eyremandi
S. Stanislas
C. Bazille
A. Daubech
T. Lazure
M.-S. Bordier
A. Demoures
Anne Rullier
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-019-02534-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Virchows Archiv 5/2019 Go to the issue

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO REVIEWERS

Acknowledgement to reviewers 2018

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor