Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Original Article

Tumour origin and R1 rates in pancreatic resections: towards consilience in pathology reporting

Authors: Munita Bal, Swapnil Rane, Sanjay Talole, Mukta Ramadwar, Kedar Deodhar, Prachi Patil, Mahesh Goel, Shailesh Shrikhande

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate differences in the R1 rates of ampullary (AC), pancreatic (PC), and distal bile duct (DBD) cancers in pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) using standardised pathology assessment. Data of PD (2010–2011) analysed in accordance with the Royal College of Pathologists (UK) protocol, were retrieved. Clinicopathologic features, including frequency, topography, and mode of margin involvement in AC (n = 87), PC (n = 18), and DBD (n = 5) cancers were evaluated. The R1 rate was 7%, 67%, and 20% in the AC, PC, and DBD cancers (p < 0.001). Within the PC cohort, R1 rate was heterogeneous (chemo-naïve, 77%; post-neoadjuvant, 40%). Commonest involved margins were as follows: posterior in overall PD (35%), AC (43%), overall PC (33%), and post-neoadjuvant PC (100%); superior mesenteric artery margin in chemo-naïve PC (38%) and common bile duct margin in DBD (100%) cancers. In AC, majority (66%) of R1 were signet ring cell type. Indirect margin involvement due to tumour within lymph node, perineural sheath or lymphovascular space was observed in 26% cases, and altered R1 rate in AC, PC, and DBD cohorts by 1%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, patients with R1 had lower disease-free survival than those with R0 (mean, 25.4 months versus 44.4 months). Tumour origin impacts R1 data in PD necessitating its accurate classification by pathologists. Indirect involvement, histology, and neoadjuvant therapy influence the R1 rate, albeit in a minority of cases. Generating cogent R1 data based on standardised pathology reporting is the foremost need of the hour.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237CrossRef Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F et al (2008) Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1651–1660CrossRef Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F et al (2008) Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1651–1660CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Campbell F, Smith RA, Whelan P, Sutton R, Raraty M, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P (2009) Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin. Histopathology 55:277–283CrossRef Campbell F, Smith RA, Whelan P, Sutton R, Raraty M, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P (2009) Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin. Histopathology 55:277–283CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM, Anthoney A, Verbeke CS (2009) Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). HPB (Oxford) 11:18–24CrossRef Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM, Anthoney A, Verbeke CS (2009) Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). HPB (Oxford) 11:18–24CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Büchler MW (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594CrossRef Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Büchler MW (2004) Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 91:586–594CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Willett CG, Lewandrowski K, Warshaw AL, Efird J, Compton CC (1993) Resection margins in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Implications for radiation therapy. Ann Surg 217:144–148CrossRef Willett CG, Lewandrowski K, Warshaw AL, Efird J, Compton CC (1993) Resection margins in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Implications for radiation therapy. Ann Surg 217:144–148CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, Wang H, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Hwang R, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, Evans DB (2007) Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 246:52–60CrossRef Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, Wang H, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Hwang R, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, Evans DB (2007) Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 246:52–60CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15CrossRef Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N, Sauvanet A, Autret A, Turrini O, Monges-Ranchin G, Boher JM (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford) 16:20–33CrossRef Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N, Sauvanet A, Autret A, Turrini O, Monges-Ranchin G, Boher JM (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford) 16:20–33CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Strobel O, Hank T, Hinz U, Bergmann F, Schneider L, Springfeld C, Jäger D, Schirmacher P, Hackert T, Büchler MW (2017) Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: The New R-status Counts. Ann Surg 265:565–573CrossRef Strobel O, Hank T, Hinz U, Bergmann F, Schneider L, Springfeld C, Jäger D, Schirmacher P, Hackert T, Büchler MW (2017) Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: The New R-status Counts. Ann Surg 265:565–573CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Verbeke CS (2008) Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer – are we there yet? Histopathology 52:787–796CrossRef Verbeke CS (2008) Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer – are we there yet? Histopathology 52:787–796CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Adsay NV, Basturk O, Saka B et al (2014) Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 38:480–493CrossRef Adsay NV, Basturk O, Saka B et al (2014) Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 38:480–493CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Katz MH, Merchant NB, Brower S et al (2011) Standardization of surgical and pathologic variables is needed in multicenter trials of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z5031 trial. Ann Surg Oncol 18:337–344CrossRef Katz MH, Merchant NB, Brower S et al (2011) Standardization of surgical and pathologic variables is needed in multicenter trials of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z5031 trial. Ann Surg Oncol 18:337–344CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Chandrasegaram MD, Goldstein D, Simes J, Gebski V, Kench JG, Gill AJ, Samra JS, Merrett ND, Richardson AJ, Barbour AP (2015) Meta-analysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 102:1459–1472CrossRef Chandrasegaram MD, Goldstein D, Simes J, Gebski V, Kench JG, Gill AJ, Samra JS, Merrett ND, Richardson AJ, Barbour AP (2015) Meta-analysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 102:1459–1472CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP (2012) Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg 99:1036–1049CrossRef Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP (2012) Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg 99:1036–1049CrossRef
17.
go back to reference van Geenen RCI, van Gulik TM, Offerhaus GJA, de Wit LT, Busch ORC, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2001) Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: an update. EJSO 27:549–557CrossRef van Geenen RCI, van Gulik TM, Offerhaus GJA, de Wit LT, Busch ORC, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2001) Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: an update. EJSO 27:549–557CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, Maschek H, Pichlmayr R (1998) Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: determinants of long-term survival in 94 resected patients. HPB Surg 11:1–11CrossRef Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, Maschek H, Pichlmayr R (1998) Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: determinants of long-term survival in 94 resected patients. HPB Surg 11:1–11CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Conlon K, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF (1996) Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 223:273–279CrossRef Conlon K, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF (1996) Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg 223:273–279CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Morris-Stiff G, Alabraba E, Tan Y-M, Shapey I, Bhati C, Tanniere P, Mayer D, Buckels J, Bramhall S, Mirza DF (2009) Assessment of survival advantage in ampullary carcinoma in relation to tumour biology and morphology. EJSO 35:746–750CrossRef Morris-Stiff G, Alabraba E, Tan Y-M, Shapey I, Bhati C, Tanniere P, Mayer D, Buckels J, Bramhall S, Mirza DF (2009) Assessment of survival advantage in ampullary carcinoma in relation to tumour biology and morphology. EJSO 35:746–750CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Westgaard A, Larønningen S, Mellem C, Eide TJ, Clausen OPF, Møller B, Gladhaug IP (2009) Are survival predictions reliable? Hospital volume versus standardisation of histopathologic reporting for accuracy of survival estimates after pancreatoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 45:2850–2890CrossRef Westgaard A, Larønningen S, Mellem C, Eide TJ, Clausen OPF, Møller B, Gladhaug IP (2009) Are survival predictions reliable? Hospital volume versus standardisation of histopathologic reporting for accuracy of survival estimates after pancreatoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 45:2850–2890CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Westgaard A, Clausen OPF, Gladhaug IP (2011) Survival estimates after pancreatoduodenectomy skewed by non-standardized histopathology reports. APMIS 119:689–700CrossRef Westgaard A, Clausen OPF, Gladhaug IP (2011) Survival estimates after pancreatoduodenectomy skewed by non-standardized histopathology reports. APMIS 119:689–700CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Barreto G, Shukla PJ (2008) Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 393:87–91CrossRef Shrikhande SV, Barreto G, Shukla PJ (2008) Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 393:87–91CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T et al (2012) Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1592–1608CrossRef Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T et al (2012) Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1592–1608CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Thampi CS, Nilkanth S, Jagannath P (2017) Reporting the margin in pancreaticoduodenectomies: R0 versus R1. Indian J Gastroenterol 36:81–87CrossRef Thampi CS, Nilkanth S, Jagannath P (2017) Reporting the margin in pancreaticoduodenectomies: R0 versus R1. Indian J Gastroenterol 36:81–87CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Somashekar BA et al (2013) Evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy in a tertiary cancer center in India: improved results from service reconfiguration. Pancreatology 13:63–71CrossRef Shrikhande SV, Barreto SG, Somashekar BA et al (2013) Evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy in a tertiary cancer center in India: improved results from service reconfiguration. Pancreatology 13:63–71CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Batra S, Suradkar K, Talole S, Desouza A, Goel M, Shrikhande SV (2016) Major gastrointestinal cancer resections in the elderly in India: poised for future challenges. Dig Surg 33:146–156CrossRef Batra S, Suradkar K, Talole S, Desouza A, Goel M, Shrikhande SV (2016) Major gastrointestinal cancer resections in the elderly in India: poised for future challenges. Dig Surg 33:146–156CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Schlitter AM, Esposito I (2010) Definition of microscopic tumor clearance (R0) in pancreatic cancer resections. Cancers (Basel) 2:2001–2010CrossRef Schlitter AM, Esposito I (2010) Definition of microscopic tumor clearance (R0) in pancreatic cancer resections. Cancers (Basel) 2:2001–2010CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Frampton AE, Cohen P, Kyriakides C, Bong JJ, Habib NA, Spalding DRC, Ahmad R, Jiao LR (2012) Tumor infiltration in the medial resection margin predicts survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1875–1882CrossRef Zhang Y, Frampton AE, Cohen P, Kyriakides C, Bong JJ, Habib NA, Spalding DRC, Ahmad R, Jiao LR (2012) Tumor infiltration in the medial resection margin predicts survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1875–1882CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Khalifa MA, Maksymov V, Rowsell C (2009) Retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen: anatomic mapping for the surgical pathologist. Virchows Arch 454:125–131CrossRef Khalifa MA, Maksymov V, Rowsell C (2009) Retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen: anatomic mapping for the surgical pathologist. Virchows Arch 454:125–131CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Verbeke C, Lohr M, Karlsson JS, Del Chiaro M (2015) Pathology reporting of pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: challenges and uncertainties. Cancer Treat Rev 41:17–26CrossRef Verbeke C, Lohr M, Karlsson JS, Del Chiaro M (2015) Pathology reporting of pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: challenges and uncertainties. Cancer Treat Rev 41:17–26CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Winner M, Goff SL, Chabot JA (2015) Neoadjuvant therapy for non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Semin Oncol 42:86–97CrossRef Winner M, Goff SL, Chabot JA (2015) Neoadjuvant therapy for non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Semin Oncol 42:86–97CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Khalifa MA, Maksymov V, Rowsell CH, Hanna S (2007) A novel approach to the intraoperative assessment of the uncinate margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen. HPB 9:146–149CrossRef Khalifa MA, Maksymov V, Rowsell CH, Hanna S (2007) A novel approach to the intraoperative assessment of the uncinate margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen. HPB 9:146–149CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, Blaszkowsky LS, Castillo CFD, Deshpande V, Hong TS, Kwak EL, Lauwers GY, Ryan DP, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR (2013) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a ‘true’ R0 resection? Ann Surg 257:731–736CrossRef Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, Blaszkowsky LS, Castillo CFD, Deshpande V, Hong TS, Kwak EL, Lauwers GY, Ryan DP, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR (2013) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a ‘true’ R0 resection? Ann Surg 257:731–736CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Mihara K, Sasaki K, Kanemoto H, Mizuno T, Okamura Y (2013) Margin status, recurrence pattern, and prognosis after resection of pancreatic cancer. Surgery 154:1078–1086CrossRef Sugiura T, Uesaka K, Mihara K, Sasaki K, Kanemoto H, Mizuno T, Okamura Y (2013) Margin status, recurrence pattern, and prognosis after resection of pancreatic cancer. Surgery 154:1078–1086CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Demir IE, Jäger C, Schlitter AM, Konukiewitz B, Stecher L, Schorn S, Tieftrunk E, Scheufele F, Calavrezos L, Schirren R, Esposito I, Weichert W, Friess H, Ceyhan GO (2017) R0 versus R1 resection matters after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and less after distal or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 2017:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002345 CrossRef Demir IE, Jäger C, Schlitter AM, Konukiewitz B, Stecher L, Schorn S, Tieftrunk E, Scheufele F, Calavrezos L, Schirren R, Esposito I, Weichert W, Friess H, Ceyhan GO (2017) R0 versus R1 resection matters after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and less after distal or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 2017:1. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000002345​ CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tumour origin and R1 rates in pancreatic resections: towards consilience in pathology reporting
Authors
Munita Bal
Swapnil Rane
Sanjay Talole
Mukta Ramadwar
Kedar Deodhar
Prachi Patil
Mahesh Goel
Shailesh Shrikhande
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2429-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Virchows Archiv 3/2018 Go to the issue