Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Article

Free digital image analysis software helps to resolve equivocal scores in HER2 immunohistochemistry

Authors: Henrik O. Helin, Vilppu J. Tuominen, Onni Ylinen, Heikki J. Helin, Jorma Isola

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is subject to interobserver variation and lack of reproducibility. Digital image analysis (DIA) has been shown to improve the consistency and accuracy of the evaluation and its use is encouraged in current testing guidelines. We studied whether digital image analysis using a free software application (ImmunoMembrane) can assist in interpreting HER2 IHC in equivocal 2+ cases. We also compared digital photomicrographs with whole-slide images (WSI) as material for ImmunoMembrane DIA. We stained 750 surgical resection specimens of invasive breast cancers immunohistochemically for HER2 and analysed staining with ImmunoMembrane. The ImmunoMembrane DIA scores were compared with the originally responsible pathologists’ visual scores, a researcher’s visual scores and in situ hybridisation (ISH) results. The originally responsible pathologists reported 9.1 % positive 3+ IHC scores, for the researcher this was 8.4 % and for ImmunoMembrane 9.5 %. Equivocal 2+ scores were 34 % for the pathologists, 43.7 % for the researcher and 10.1 % for ImmunoMembrane. Negative 0/1+ scores were 57.6 % for the pathologists, 46.8 % for the researcher and 80.8 % for ImmunoMembrane. There were six false positive cases, which were classified as 3+ by ImmunoMembrane and negative by ISH. Six cases were false negative defined as 0/1+ by IHC and positive by ISH. ImmunoMembrane DIA using digital photomicrographs and WSI showed almost perfect agreement. In conclusion, digital image analysis by ImmunoMembrane can help to resolve a majority of equivocal 2+ cases in HER2 IHC, which reduces the need for ISH testing.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rydén L, Haglund M, Bendahl PO, et al. (2009) Reproducibility of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 analysis in primary breast cancer: a national survey performed at pathology departments in Sweden. Acta Oncol 48:860–866. doi:10.1080/02841860902862511 PubMed Rydén L, Haglund M, Bendahl PO, et al. (2009) Reproducibility of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 analysis in primary breast cancer: a national survey performed at pathology departments in Sweden. Acta Oncol 48:860–866. doi:10.​1080/​0284186090286251​1 PubMed
3.
go back to reference Francis GD, Dimech M, Giles L, et al. (2007) Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program. J Clin Pathol 60:1277–1283. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.044701 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Francis GD, Dimech M, Giles L, et al. (2007) Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program. J Clin Pathol 60:1277–1283. doi:10.​1136/​jcp.​2006.​044701 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, et al. (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775 CrossRefPubMed Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, et al. (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:118–145. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​09.​2775 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:3997–4013. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 CrossRefPubMed Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:3997–4013. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​50.​9984 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Minot DM, Voss J, Rademacher S, et al. (2012) Image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemical staining. Reproducibility and concordance with fluorescence in situ hybridization of a laboratory-validated scoring technique. Am J Clin Pathol 137:270–276. doi:10.1309/AJCP9MKNLHQNK2ZX CrossRefPubMed Minot DM, Voss J, Rademacher S, et al. (2012) Image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemical staining. Reproducibility and concordance with fluorescence in situ hybridization of a laboratory-validated scoring technique. Am J Clin Pathol 137:270–276. doi:10.​1309/​AJCP9MKNLHQNK2ZX​ CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hall BH, Ianosi-Irimie M, Javidian P, et al. (2008) Computer-assisted assessment of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical assay in imaged histologic sections using a membrane isolation algorithm and quantitative analysis of positive controls. BMC Med Imaging 8:11. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-8-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hall BH, Ianosi-Irimie M, Javidian P, et al. (2008) Computer-assisted assessment of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical assay in imaged histologic sections using a membrane isolation algorithm and quantitative analysis of positive controls. BMC Med Imaging 8:11. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2342-8-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Rojo MG, Bueno G, Slodkowska J (2009) Review of imaging solutions for integrated quantitative immunohistochemistry in the pathology daily practice. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 47:349–354. doi:10.2478/v10042-008-0114-4 PubMed Rojo MG, Bueno G, Slodkowska J (2009) Review of imaging solutions for integrated quantitative immunohistochemistry in the pathology daily practice. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 47:349–354. doi:10.​2478/​v10042-008-0114-4 PubMed
28.
go back to reference Minot DM, Kipp BR, Root RM, et al. (2009) Automated cellular imaging system III for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer specimens: development of a standardized scoring method that correlates with FISH. Am J Clin Pathol 132:133–138. doi:10.1309/AJCPJV0SKAF2PCMY CrossRefPubMed Minot DM, Kipp BR, Root RM, et al. (2009) Automated cellular imaging system III for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer specimens: development of a standardized scoring method that correlates with FISH. Am J Clin Pathol 132:133–138. doi:10.​1309/​AJCPJV0SKAF2PCMY​ CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Cantaloni C, Tonini RE, Eccher C, et al. (2011) Diagnostic value of automated Her2 evaluation in breast cancer: a study on 272 equivocal (score 2+) Her2 immunoreactive cases using an FDA approved system. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 19:306–312. doi:10.1097/PAI.0b013e318205b03a CrossRefPubMed Cantaloni C, Tonini RE, Eccher C, et al. (2011) Diagnostic value of automated Her2 evaluation in breast cancer: a study on 272 equivocal (score 2+) Her2 immunoreactive cases using an FDA approved system. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 19:306–312. doi:10.​1097/​PAI.​0b013e318205b03a​ CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Turashvili G, Leung S, Turbin D, et al. (2009) Inter-observer reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical assessment and concordance with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis. BMC Cancer 9:165. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-9-165 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turashvili G, Leung S, Turbin D, et al. (2009) Inter-observer reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical assessment and concordance with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis. BMC Cancer 9:165. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2407-9-165 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Laurinaviciene A, Dasevicius D, Ostapenko V, et al. (2011) Membrane connectivity estimated by digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry is concordant with visual scoring and fluorescence in situ hybridization results: algorithm evaluation on breast cancer tissue microarrays. Diagn Pathol 6:87. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-6-87 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laurinaviciene A, Dasevicius D, Ostapenko V, et al. (2011) Membrane connectivity estimated by digital image analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry is concordant with visual scoring and fluorescence in situ hybridization results: algorithm evaluation on breast cancer tissue microarrays. Diagn Pathol 6:87. doi:10.​1186/​1746-1596-6-87 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Atkinson R, Mollerup J, Laenkholm AV, et al. (2011) Effects of the change in cutoff values for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a study comparing conventional brightfield microscopy, image analysis-assisted microscopy, and interobserver variation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135:1010–1016. doi:10.5858/2010-0462-OAR CrossRefPubMed Atkinson R, Mollerup J, Laenkholm AV, et al. (2011) Effects of the change in cutoff values for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization: a study comparing conventional brightfield microscopy, image analysis-assisted microscopy, and interobserver variation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135:1010–1016. doi:10.​5858/​2010-0462-OAR CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Starczynski J, Atkey N, Connelly Y, et al. (2012) HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: a rogues’ gallery of challenging diagnostic cases: UKNEQAS interpretation guidelines and research recommendations. Am J Clin Pathol 137:595–605. doi:10.1309/AJCPATBZ2JFN1QQC CrossRefPubMed Starczynski J, Atkey N, Connelly Y, et al. (2012) HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer: a rogues’ gallery of challenging diagnostic cases: UKNEQAS interpretation guidelines and research recommendations. Am J Clin Pathol 137:595–605. doi:10.​1309/​AJCPATBZ2JFN1QQC​ CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Wilbur DC, Brachtel EF, Gilbertson JR, et al. (2015) Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: accuracy, precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation. J Pathol Inform 6:22. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.157788 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilbur DC, Brachtel EF, Gilbertson JR, et al. (2015) Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: accuracy, precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation. J Pathol Inform 6:22. doi:10.​4103/​2153-3539.​157788 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Free digital image analysis software helps to resolve equivocal scores in HER2 immunohistochemistry
Authors
Henrik O. Helin
Vilppu J. Tuominen
Onni Ylinen
Heikki J. Helin
Jorma Isola
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1868-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Virchows Archiv 2/2016 Go to the issue