Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 1/2014

01-07-2014 | Original Article

Ki-67 cytological index can distinguish well-differentiated from poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative cytohistological study of 53 cases

Authors: Gabriele Carlinfante, Paola Baccarini, Debora Berretti, Tiziana Cassetti, Maurizio Cavina, Rita Conigliaro, Alessandro De Pellegrin, Luca Di Tommaso, Carlo Fabbri, Adele Fornelli, Andrea Frasoldati, Giorgio Gardini, Luisa Losi, Livia Maccio, Raffaele Manta, Nico Pagano, Romano Sassatelli, Silvia Serra, Lorenzo Camellini

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The Ki-67 labeling index has been found to bear prognostic significance in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and it was recently incorporated in NET histological grading. Nevertheless, a reliable preoperative determination of NET grading could be useful in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to compare the results of Ki-67 labeling index, as measured on cytological samples and on surgical specimens of patients with pancreatic NETs (P-NETs). We also investigated whether concordance might be improved, using a 5 % (instead of 2 %) cutoff value for defining G2 tumors. We retrospectively identified 48 consecutive patients with 53 P-NETs, from our five institutions, and we measured Ki-67 labeling index on their cytological samples and surgical specimens. The traditional 2 % and the alternative 5 % cutoff values were used to classify G2 tumors. The concordance rate between cytological and histological grading was 46/53 (86.8 %; weighted κ statistic 0.77; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.60–0.94). No cases of cytological G1-G2 NETs were upgraded to G3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) at histological grading. Cytology was found to be highly specific in the diagnosis of both G2 (94.1 %; 95 % CI 80.3–99.3) and G3 tumors (100.0 %; 95 % CI 92.8–100), but the sensitivity was poor for G2 NETs (66.7 %; 95 % CI 38.4–88.2) and high for the prediction of G3 NECs (100 %; 95 % CI 39.8–100.0). When the 5 % cutoff value was adopted, concordance rate was 49/53 (92.4 %; weighted κ 0.82; 95 % CI 0.64–1.00). In conclusion, Ki-67 cytological expression can distinguish well-differentiated (both G1 and G2) from poorly differentiated P-NETs, and it may be useful for their preoperative classification.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW, Erikssson B, Falchetti A, Falconi M, Komminoth M, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol AM, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoazec JY, Wiedenmann B, Frascati Consensus Conference participants (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449:395–401PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW, Erikssson B, Falchetti A, Falconi M, Komminoth M, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol AM, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoazec JY, Wiedenmann B, Frascati Consensus Conference participants (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449:395–401PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, Capella C, Klimstra DS, Klöppel G, Komminoth P, Solcia E (2010) Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon, France, pp 13–14 Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, Capella C, Klimstra DS, Klöppel G, Komminoth P, Solcia E (2010) Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon, France, pp 13–14
3.
go back to reference Pape UF, Jann H, Mueller-Nordhorn J, Bockelbrink A, Berndt U, Willich SN, Koch M, Roecken C, Rindi G, Wiedenmann B (2008) Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 113:256–265PubMedCrossRef Pape UF, Jann H, Mueller-Nordhorn J, Bockelbrink A, Berndt U, Willich SN, Koch M, Roecken C, Rindi G, Wiedenmann B (2008) Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 113:256–265PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Strosberg J, Nasir A, Coppola D, Wick M, Kvols L (2009) Correlation between grade and prognosis in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Hum Pathol 40:1262–1268PubMedCrossRef Strosberg J, Nasir A, Coppola D, Wick M, Kvols L (2009) Correlation between grade and prognosis in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Hum Pathol 40:1262–1268PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scarpa A, Mantovani W, Capelli P, Beghelli S, Boninsegna L, Bettini R, Panzuto F, Pederzoli P, Delle Fave G, Falconi M (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients. Mod Pathol 23:824–833PubMedCrossRef Scarpa A, Mantovani W, Capelli P, Beghelli S, Boninsegna L, Bettini R, Panzuto F, Pederzoli P, Delle Fave G, Falconi M (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients. Mod Pathol 23:824–833PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Panzuto F, Boninsegna L, Fazio N, Campana D, Pia Brizzi M, Capurso G, Scarpa A, De Braud F, Dogliotti L, Tomassetti P, Delle Fave G, Falconi M (2011) Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression. J Clin Oncol 29:2372–2377PubMedCrossRef Panzuto F, Boninsegna L, Fazio N, Campana D, Pia Brizzi M, Capurso G, Scarpa A, De Braud F, Dogliotti L, Tomassetti P, Delle Fave G, Falconi M (2011) Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression. J Clin Oncol 29:2372–2377PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Boninsegna L, Panzuto F, Partelli S, Capelli P, Delle Fave G, Bettini R, Pederzoli P, Scarpa A, Falconi M (2012) Malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour: lymph node ratio and Ki-67 are predictors of recurrence after curative resections. Eur J Cancer 48:1608–1615PubMedCrossRef Boninsegna L, Panzuto F, Partelli S, Capelli P, Delle Fave G, Bettini R, Pederzoli P, Scarpa A, Falconi M (2012) Malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour: lymph node ratio and Ki-67 are predictors of recurrence after curative resections. Eur J Cancer 48:1608–1615PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Couvelard A, Deschamps L, Ravaud P, Baron G, Sauvanet A, Hentic O, Colnot N, Paradis V, Belghiti J, Bedossa P, Ruszniewski P (2009) Heterogeneity of tumor prognostic markers: a reproducibility study applied to liver metastases of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Mod Pathol 22:273–281PubMedCrossRef Couvelard A, Deschamps L, Ravaud P, Baron G, Sauvanet A, Hentic O, Colnot N, Paradis V, Belghiti J, Bedossa P, Ruszniewski P (2009) Heterogeneity of tumor prognostic markers: a reproducibility study applied to liver metastases of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Mod Pathol 22:273–281PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Adsay V, Chetty R, Deshpande V, Goenen M, Jensen RT, Kidd M, Kulke MH, Lloyd RV, Moran C, Moss SF, Oberg K, O’Toole D, Rindi G, Robert ME, Suster S, Tang LH, Tzen CY, Washington MK, Wiedenmann B, Yao J (2010) Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: application of the Delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set. Am J Surg Pathol 34:300–313PubMedCrossRef Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Adsay V, Chetty R, Deshpande V, Goenen M, Jensen RT, Kidd M, Kulke MH, Lloyd RV, Moran C, Moss SF, Oberg K, O’Toole D, Rindi G, Robert ME, Suster S, Tang LH, Tzen CY, Washington MK, Wiedenmann B, Yao J (2010) Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: application of the Delphic consensus process to the development of a minimum pathology data set. Am J Surg Pathol 34:300–313PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rindi G, Bordi C, La Rosa S, Solcia E, Delle Fave G on behalf of the “Gruppo Italiano Patologi Apparato Digerente (GIPAD)” and of the “Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citopatologia Diagnostica”/International Academy of Pathology, Italian division (SIAPEC/IAP) (2011) Gastroenteropancreatic (neuro)endocrine neoplasms: the histology report. Dig Liver Dis 43S:S356–S360 Rindi G, Bordi C, La Rosa S, Solcia E, Delle Fave G on behalf of the “Gruppo Italiano Patologi Apparato Digerente (GIPAD)” and of the “Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citopatologia Diagnostica”/International Academy of Pathology, Italian division (SIAPEC/IAP) (2011) Gastroenteropancreatic (neuro)endocrine neoplasms: the histology report. Dig Liver Dis 43S:S356–S360
11.
go back to reference Goodell PP, Krasinskas AM, Davison JM, Hartman DJ (2012) Comparison of methods for proliferative index analysis for grading pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 137:576–582PubMedCrossRef Goodell PP, Krasinskas AM, Davison JM, Hartman DJ (2012) Comparison of methods for proliferative index analysis for grading pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 137:576–582PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bettini R, Partelli S, Boninsegna L, Capelli P, Crippa S, Pederzoli P, Scarpa A, Falconi M (2011) Tumor size correlates with malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor. Surgery 150:75–82PubMedCrossRef Bettini R, Partelli S, Boninsegna L, Capelli P, Crippa S, Pederzoli P, Scarpa A, Falconi M (2011) Tumor size correlates with malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor. Surgery 150:75–82PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Oeberg K (2012) Neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive tract: impact of new classifications and new agents on therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Oncol 24:433–440CrossRef Oeberg K (2012) Neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive tract: impact of new classifications and new agents on therapeutic approaches. Curr Opin Oncol 24:433–440CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Piani P, Franchi GM, Cappelletti C, Scavini M, Albarello L, Zerbi Z, Arcidiacono PG, Bosi E, Manzoni MF (2008) Cytological Ki-67 in pancreatic endocrine tumours: an opportunity for pre-operative grading. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:175–181PubMedCrossRef Piani P, Franchi GM, Cappelletti C, Scavini M, Albarello L, Zerbi Z, Arcidiacono PG, Bosi E, Manzoni MF (2008) Cytological Ki-67 in pancreatic endocrine tumours: an opportunity for pre-operative grading. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:175–181PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Figueiredo FAF, Giovannini M, Monges G, Bories E, Pesenti C, Caillol F, Delpero JR (2009) EUS-FNA predicts 5-year survival in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 70:907–914PubMedCrossRef Figueiredo FAF, Giovannini M, Monges G, Bories E, Pesenti C, Caillol F, Delpero JR (2009) EUS-FNA predicts 5-year survival in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 70:907–914PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kaklamatos M, Dimitrios T, Kanakis G, Alexandrakis K, Sougioultzis S, Kaltsas G, Karoumpalis I, Salla C, Diakatou E, Kontogeorgos G (2011) Diagnostic accuracy and clinical significance of the fine needle aspiration Ki-67 labeling index in pancreatic endocrine tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 18:L1–L3CrossRef Kaklamatos M, Dimitrios T, Kanakis G, Alexandrakis K, Sougioultzis S, Kaltsas G, Karoumpalis I, Salla C, Diakatou E, Kontogeorgos G (2011) Diagnostic accuracy and clinical significance of the fine needle aspiration Ki-67 labeling index in pancreatic endocrine tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 18:L1–L3CrossRef
17.
go back to reference De Angelis C, Pacchioni D, Carucci P, Bruno M, Allegranza P, Barreca A, Brizzi F, Valente V, Mezzabotta L, Reggio D, Rizzetto M (2011) Role of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and value of Ki-67. Dig Liver Dis 43S:S143, AbsCrossRef De Angelis C, Pacchioni D, Carucci P, Bruno M, Allegranza P, Barreca A, Brizzi F, Valente V, Mezzabotta L, Reggio D, Rizzetto M (2011) Role of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and value of Ki-67. Dig Liver Dis 43S:S143, AbsCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Larghi A, Capurso G, Carnuccio A, Ricci R, Alfieri S, Galasso D, Lugli F, Bianchi A, Panzuto F, De Marinis L, Falconi M, Delle Fave Doglietto GB, Costamagna G, Rindi G (2012) Ki-67 grading of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on histologic samples obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 76:570–577PubMedCrossRef Larghi A, Capurso G, Carnuccio A, Ricci R, Alfieri S, Galasso D, Lugli F, Bianchi A, Panzuto F, De Marinis L, Falconi M, Delle Fave Doglietto GB, Costamagna G, Rindi G (2012) Ki-67 grading of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on histologic samples obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 76:570–577PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tatsumoto S, Kodama Y, Sakurai Y, Shinohara T, Katanuma A, Maguchi H (2013) Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: correlation between computed tomography enhancement patterns and prognostic factors of surgical and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Abdom Imaging 38:358–366PubMedCrossRef Tatsumoto S, Kodama Y, Sakurai Y, Shinohara T, Katanuma A, Maguchi H (2013) Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: correlation between computed tomography enhancement patterns and prognostic factors of surgical and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Abdom Imaging 38:358–366PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hasegawa T, Yamao K, Hijioka S, Bhatia V, Mizuno N, Hara K, Imaoka H, Niwa Y, Tajika M, Kondo S, Tanaka T, Shimizu Y, Kinoshita T, Kohsaki T, Nishimori I, Iwasaki S, Saibara T, Hosoda W, Yatabe Y (2013) Evaluation of Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens for the assessment of malignancy risk in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endoscopy. [Epub ahead of print] Hasegawa T, Yamao K, Hijioka S, Bhatia V, Mizuno N, Hara K, Imaoka H, Niwa Y, Tajika M, Kondo S, Tanaka T, Shimizu Y, Kinoshita T, Kohsaki T, Nishimori I, Iwasaki S, Saibara T, Hosoda W, Yatabe Y (2013) Evaluation of Ki-67 index in EUS-FNA specimens for the assessment of malignancy risk in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endoscopy. [Epub ahead of print]
21.
go back to reference McKee GT, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D (2001) A reliable method of demonstrating HER-2/neu, estrogen receptors, and progesterone receptors on routinely processed cytologic material. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 9:352–357PubMedCrossRef McKee GT, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D (2001) A reliable method of demonstrating HER-2/neu, estrogen receptors, and progesterone receptors on routinely processed cytologic material. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 9:352–357PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Krishnamurthy S, Dimashkieh H, Patel S, Sneige N (2003) Immunocytochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor on archival Papanicolau-stained fine needle aspirate smears. Diagn Cytopathol 29:309–314PubMedCrossRef Krishnamurthy S, Dimashkieh H, Patel S, Sneige N (2003) Immunocytochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor on archival Papanicolau-stained fine needle aspirate smears. Diagn Cytopathol 29:309–314PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P, Morales AR (2005) Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered. Am J Clin Pathol 123:21–27PubMedCrossRef Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P, Morales AR (2005) Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered. Am J Clin Pathol 123:21–27PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference McCall CM, Shi C, Cornish TC, Klimstra DS, Tang LH, Basturk O, Jun Mun L, Ellison TA, Wolfgang CL, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Edil BH, Hruban RH (2013) Grading of well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is improved by the inclusion of both Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic rate. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1671–1677PubMedCrossRef McCall CM, Shi C, Cornish TC, Klimstra DS, Tang LH, Basturk O, Jun Mun L, Ellison TA, Wolfgang CL, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Edil BH, Hruban RH (2013) Grading of well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is improved by the inclusion of both Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic rate. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1671–1677PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tang LH, Gonen M, Hedvat C, Modlin IM, Klimstra DS (2012) Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system. A comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1761–1770PubMedCrossRef Tang LH, Gonen M, Hedvat C, Modlin IM, Klimstra DS (2012) Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system. A comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods. Am J Surg Pathol 36:1761–1770PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yang Z, Tang LH, Klimstra DS (2011) Effect of Tumor Heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki-67 labeling index in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: implications for prognostic stratification. Am J Surg Pathol 35:853–860PubMedCrossRef Yang Z, Tang LH, Klimstra DS (2011) Effect of Tumor Heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki-67 labeling index in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: implications for prognostic stratification. Am J Surg Pathol 35:853–860PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, Albarello L, Boninsegna L, Buchler W, Capella C, Caplin M, Couvelard A, Doglioni C, Delle Fave G, Fisher L, Fusai G, de Herder WW, Jann H, Komminoth P, de Krijer RR, La Rosa S, Luong TV, Pape U, Perren A, Ruszniewski P, Scarpa A, Schmitt A, Solcia E, Wiedenmann B (2012) TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:764–777PubMedCrossRef Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, Albarello L, Boninsegna L, Buchler W, Capella C, Caplin M, Couvelard A, Doglioni C, Delle Fave G, Fisher L, Fusai G, de Herder WW, Jann H, Komminoth P, de Krijer RR, La Rosa S, Luong TV, Pape U, Perren A, Ruszniewski P, Scarpa A, Schmitt A, Solcia E, Wiedenmann B (2012) TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:764–777PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ki-67 cytological index can distinguish well-differentiated from poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative cytohistological study of 53 cases
Authors
Gabriele Carlinfante
Paola Baccarini
Debora Berretti
Tiziana Cassetti
Maurizio Cavina
Rita Conigliaro
Alessandro De Pellegrin
Luca Di Tommaso
Carlo Fabbri
Adele Fornelli
Andrea Frasoldati
Giorgio Gardini
Luisa Losi
Livia Maccio
Raffaele Manta
Nico Pagano
Romano Sassatelli
Silvia Serra
Lorenzo Camellini
Publication date
01-07-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-014-1585-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Virchows Archiv 1/2014 Go to the issue