Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Original Article

Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the frequency of pre-defined clinical outcomes in relation to umbilical cord coiling indices >90th percentile and <10th percentile in an unselected population of >1,000 women with a singleton pregnancy resulting in livebirth delivering at or near term and to report these findings in the context of a systematic review. Placentas of consecutive deliveries from an unselected low-risk population with >15 cm attached umbilical cords were included in the study. Clinical outcomes included interventional delivery, birthweight <10th percentile, Apgar score <7 at 1 min, neonatal acidosis (pH < 7.2) and admission to neonatal special care. Standard MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines were observed for the systematic review. Umbilical coiling index was determined for 1,082 placentas. Mean maternal age was 30.7 years (standard deviation [SD] = 5.7) and 519 women (48 %) were primiparous. Mean cord length was 43 cm (SD = 13) and mean cord coiling index 0.20 (SD = 0.09). A total of 866 cords were normally coiled, and 108 cases were hypercoiled (>90th centile) and 108 cases were undercoiled (<10th percentile). There were no differences between cases of overcoiled, normally coiled or undercoiled cords for any clinical outcome studied. The systematic review yielded a small number of clinical studies which were too statistically and clinically heterogenous to permit meta-analysis. There is insufficient evidence either from this unselected cohort study or from a systematic review to support the previous suggestion that cord coiling index >90th centile or <10th centile is associated with adverse clinical outcome in an unselected population. Previous studies that draw a link between abnormal cord coiling and clinical outcome are generally too small and/or selective to allow meaningful conclusions or applicability to low-risk populations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strong TH Jr, Jarles DL, Vega JS, Feldman DB (1994) The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:29–32PubMedCrossRef Strong TH Jr, Jarles DL, Vega JS, Feldman DB (1994) The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:29–32PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Azocarespin B (1964) Significance of coiling of the umbilical cord. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez 24:771–781PubMed Azocarespin B (1964) Significance of coiling of the umbilical cord. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez 24:771–781PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bankowski M (1964) Intrauterine asphyxia due to excessive coiling of the umbilical cord. Pol Tyg Lek 19:1248–1249PubMed Bankowski M (1964) Intrauterine asphyxia due to excessive coiling of the umbilical cord. Pol Tyg Lek 19:1248–1249PubMed
4.
go back to reference de Laat MW, Franx A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Nikkels PG (2006) Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 107:1049–1055PubMedCrossRef de Laat MW, Franx A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Nikkels PG (2006) Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 107:1049–1055PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference de Laat MW, Franx A, Nikkels PG, Visser GH (2006) Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:704–709PubMedCrossRef de Laat MW, Franx A, Nikkels PG, Visser GH (2006) Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:704–709PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Degani S, Leibovich Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G (2001) Early second-trimester low umbilical coiling index predicts small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 20:1183–1188PubMed Degani S, Leibovich Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G (2001) Early second-trimester low umbilical coiling index predicts small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 20:1183–1188PubMed
7.
go back to reference Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S, Saygili U, Cinar O, Mumcu A (1996) Umbilical coiling index: is it a marker for the foetus at risk? Br J Clin Pract 50:254–256PubMed Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S, Saygili U, Cinar O, Mumcu A (1996) Umbilical coiling index: is it a marker for the foetus at risk? Br J Clin Pract 50:254–256PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J (2006) The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:8–13PubMedCrossRef Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J (2006) The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:8–13PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rana J, Ebert GA, Kappy KA (1995) Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol 85:573–577PubMedCrossRef Rana J, Ebert GA, Kappy KA (1995) Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol 85:573–577PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E (2000) Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Dev Pathol 3:462–471PubMedCrossRef Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E (2000) Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Dev Pathol 3:462–471PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Sebire NJ (2007) Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:804–806PubMedCrossRef Sebire NJ (2007) Pathophysiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:804–806PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pathak S, Hook E, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Sebire NJ, Jessop F, Lees C (2010) Cord coiling, umbilical cord insertion and placental shape in an unselected cohort delivering at term: relationship with common obstetric outcomes. Placenta 31:963–968PubMedCrossRef Pathak S, Hook E, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Sebire NJ, Jessop F, Lees C (2010) Cord coiling, umbilical cord insertion and placental shape in an unselected cohort delivering at term: relationship with common obstetric outcomes. Placenta 31:963–968PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gersell DJ (1998) ASCP survey on placental examination. Am J Clin Pathol 109:127–143PubMed Gersell DJ (1998) ASCP survey on placental examination. Am J Clin Pathol 109:127–143PubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Pathak S, Lees CC, Hackett G, Jessop F, Sebire NJ (2011) Frequency and clinical significance of placental histological lesions in an unselected population at or near term. Virchows Arch 459:565–572PubMedCrossRef Pathak S, Lees CC, Hackett G, Jessop F, Sebire NJ (2011) Frequency and clinical significance of placental histological lesions in an unselected population at or near term. Virchows Arch 459:565–572PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pathak S, Sebire NJ, Hook L, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Jessop F, Lees C (2011) Relationship between placental morphology and histological findings in an unselected population near term.). Virchows Arch 459:11–20PubMedCrossRef Pathak S, Sebire NJ, Hook L, Hackett G, Murdoch E, Jessop F, Lees C (2011) Relationship between placental morphology and histological findings in an unselected population near term.). Virchows Arch 459:11–20PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.The Cochrane Collaboration. http://handbook.cochrane.org (version 5.1.0, updated March 2011). Accessed 31 August 2011. Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.The Cochrane Collaboration. http://​handbook.​cochrane.​org (version 5.1.0, updated March 2011). Accessed 31 August 2011.
22.
go back to reference Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S (2012) Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012:213–689CrossRef Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S (2012) Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012:213–689CrossRef
23.
go back to reference de Laat MW, van Alderen ED, Franx A, Visser GH, Bots ML, Nikkels PG (2007) The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:66–72PubMedCrossRef de Laat MW, van Alderen ED, Franx A, Visser GH, Bots ML, Nikkels PG (2007) The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 130:66–72PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST, Baergen RN, Chervenak FA (2005) Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:387–394PubMedCrossRef Predanic M, Perni SC, Chasen ST, Baergen RN, Chervenak FA (2005) Ultrasound evaluation of abnormal umbilical cord coiling in second trimester of gestation in association with adverse pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:387–394PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Otsubo Y, Yoneyama Y, Suzuki S, Sawa R, Araki T (1999) Sonographic evaluation of umbilical cord insertion with umbilical coiling index. J Clin Ultrasound 27:341–344PubMedCrossRef Otsubo Y, Yoneyama Y, Suzuki S, Sawa R, Araki T (1999) Sonographic evaluation of umbilical cord insertion with umbilical coiling index. J Clin Ultrasound 27:341–344PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ (2001) The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. New Engl J Med 344:467–471PubMedCrossRef Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ (2001) The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. New Engl J Med 344:467–471PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Armstrong L, Stenson BJ (2007) Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:430–434CrossRef Armstrong L, Stenson BJ (2007) Use of umbilical cord blood gas analysis in the assessment of the newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 92:430–434CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ernst LM, Minturn L, Huang MH, Curry E, Su EJ (2013) Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta 34:583–588PubMedCrossRef Ernst LM, Minturn L, Huang MH, Curry E, Su EJ (2013) Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta 34:583–588PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review
Publication date
01-01-2014
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1513-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Virchows Archiv 1/2014 Go to the issue