Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2020

01-12-2020 | Enterostomy | Original Article

Is an enhanced recovery program (ERP) after rectal surgery as feasible as after colonic surgery? A multicentre Francophone study of 870 rectal resections

Authors: J. Veziant, K. Poirot, A. Mulliez, B. Pereira, K. Slim, The Francophone Group for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (GRACE)

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery program (ERP) is well-established in colorectal surgery. Rectal surgery (RS) is known to be associated with high morbidity and prolonged hospital stay, which might explain why ERPs are less applied in this specific group of patients. The aim of this large-scale study was to assess the feasibility of an ERP in RS compared with colonic surgery.

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database including 3740 patients eligible for colorectal resection from February 2014 to January 2017 in 75 European Francophone centres. Patients were divided into two groups (colon group C vs. rectum group R). The main endpoint was compliance with ERP components. A subgroup analysis was performed in patients for whom a defunctioning stoma (DS) was required after RS.

Results

A total of 3740 patients were included. There were 2870 patients in group C and 870 patients in group R. The overall compliance rate for ERPs was 81.71% in group C and 79.09% in group R. Patients were significantly less mobilized within 24 h in group R. Specific recommendations for RS concerning bowel preparation and abdominal drainage were significantly less implemented. Overall morbidity was significantly higher in group R. Mean length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in group C. In the sub-group analysis, a DS was significantly associated with fewer compliance with early mobilization and early feeding, leading to significantly longer LOS (group R).

Conclusion

ERP is safe and effective in RS, despite the well-known higher morbidity and LOS compared with colonic surgery. DS could be a limiting factor in ERP implementation after RS.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KCH, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6CrossRefPubMed Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KCH, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:285–305. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00268-012-1787-6CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AGH, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KCH, von Meyenfeldt MF (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5468CrossRefPubMed Maessen J, Dejong CHC, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AGH, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KCH, von Meyenfeldt MF (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​bjs.​5468CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Maurice-Szamburski A, Auquier P, Viarre-Oreal V, Cuvillon P, Carles M, Ripart J, Honore S, Triglia T, Loundou A, Leone M, Bruder N, PremedX Study Investigators (2015) Effect of sedative premedication on patient experience after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:916–925. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.1108CrossRefPubMed Maurice-Szamburski A, Auquier P, Viarre-Oreal V, Cuvillon P, Carles M, Ripart J, Honore S, Triglia T, Loundou A, Leone M, Bruder N, PremedX Study Investigators (2015) Effect of sedative premedication on patient experience after general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313:916–925. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2015.​1108CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld B, van der Zaag E, van Geloven A, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA, LAFA study group (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd1ceCrossRefPubMed Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld B, van der Zaag E, van Geloven A, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA, LAFA study group (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e31821fd1ce​CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Younis J, Salerno G, Fanto D, Hadjipavlou M, Chellar D, Trickett JP (2012) Focused preoperative patient stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge within the enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:43–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1252-2CrossRef Younis J, Salerno G, Fanto D, Hadjipavlou M, Chellar D, Trickett JP (2012) Focused preoperative patient stoma education, prior to ileostomy formation after anterior resection, contributes to a reduction in delayed discharge within the enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:43–47. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00384-011-1252-2CrossRef
48.
50.
go back to reference De Crignis L, Slim K, Cotte E, Meillat H, Dupré A (2020) Impact of surgical indication on patient outcomes and compliance with enhanced recovery program for colorectal surgery: A Francophone multicenter retrospective analysis. J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26097 De Crignis L, Slim K, Cotte E, Meillat H, Dupré A (2020) Impact of surgical indication on patient outcomes and compliance with enhanced recovery program for colorectal surgery: A Francophone multicenter retrospective analysis. J Surg Oncol. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jso.​26097
Metadata
Title
Is an enhanced recovery program (ERP) after rectal surgery as feasible as after colonic surgery? A multicentre Francophone study of 870 rectal resections
Authors
J. Veziant
K. Poirot
A. Mulliez
B. Pereira
K. Slim
The Francophone Group for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (GRACE)
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02001-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2020 Go to the issue