Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2018

01-08-2018 | How-I-Do-It Article

Segment 5 parenchymal sparing in extended left hepatectomy with respect to venous outflow—is it a feasible procedure?

Authors: Jun Li, Moustafa Mohamed, Lutz Fischer, Björn Nashan

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Segment 5 (S5) sparing liver resection for cases that require an anatomic left trisectionectomy has not been reported yet. The authors intended to verify the outcome of S5-sparing extended left hepatectomy (ELH) in respect to venous outflow.

Methods

All adult patients who underwent S5-sparing ELH between 2012 and 2017 in authors’ institute have been enrolled in this study. S5-sparring ELH was defined as resection of S2, S3, S4, and S8 with or without S1. The surgery planning was based on the images from two-dimensional triphasic computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. A three-dimensional image reconstruction and liver volumetric study were performed retrospectively.

Results

Out of 177 cases of major hepatic resection, only seven non-hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients underwent ELH during the study period. S5-sparing ELH was performed to five patients, in whom no tumor involvement in S5. The venous outflow of S5 has been maintained intraoperative, and S5 congestion has not been observed in all patients. Tailored management of the S5 venous outflow ensured an increase in functional remnant liver volume by 52.8% (range, 25.6 to 66.9%) by sparing of S5. A negative resection margin was achieved in all patients. One patient had postoperative bile leak requiring reoperation. No posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) has been observed.

Conclusion

S5-sparing ELH is technically feasible. Under the tailored management of S5 venous outflow, the functional future liver remnant can be increased. Further studies with larger sample size are needed to evaluate which circumstances the liver segment 5 could be preserved without venous reconstruction during the left extended hepatectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, Ponti A, Nuzzo G, Giulini SM, Aldrighetti L, Calise F, Gerunda GE, Tomatis M, Amisano M (2012) Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients. Arch Surg 147(12):1107–1113CrossRefPubMed Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, Ponti A, Nuzzo G, Giulini SM, Aldrighetti L, Calise F, Gerunda GE, Tomatis M, Amisano M (2012) Surgical approach for long-term survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 434 patients. Arch Surg 147(12):1107–1113CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Paik KY, Jung JC, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Kim YI (2008) What prognostic factors are important for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(5):766–770CrossRefPubMed Paik KY, Jung JC, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Kim YI (2008) What prognostic factors are important for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(5):766–770CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Starzl TE, Iwatsuki S, Shaw BW Jr, Waterman PM, Van Thiel D (1982) Left hepatic trisegmentectomy. Surger Gynecol Obs 155(1):21 Starzl TE, Iwatsuki S, Shaw BW Jr, Waterman PM, Van Thiel D (1982) Left hepatic trisegmentectomy. Surger Gynecol Obs 155(1):21
4.
go back to reference Nishio H, Hidalgo E, Hamady ZZ, Ravindra KV, Kotru A, Dasgupta D, Al-Mukhtar A, Prasad KR, Toogood GJ, Lodge JPA (2005) Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy: results and an appraisal of its current role. Ann Surg 242(2):267–275CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nishio H, Hidalgo E, Hamady ZZ, Ravindra KV, Kotru A, Dasgupta D, Al-Mukhtar A, Prasad KR, Toogood GJ, Lodge JPA (2005) Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy: results and an appraisal of its current role. Ann Surg 242(2):267–275CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
go back to reference Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Brokalaki EI, Radtke A, Frilling A, Molmenti EP, Malagó M, Broelsch CE (2006) Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 203(3):311–321CrossRefPubMed Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Brokalaki EI, Radtke A, Frilling A, Molmenti EP, Malagó M, Broelsch CE (2006) Left hepatic trisectionectomy for hepatobiliary malignancies. J Am Coll Surg 203(3):311–321CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lee SG (2015) A complete treatment of adult living donor liver transplantation: a review of surgical technique and current challenges to expand indication of patients. Am J Transplant 15(1):17–38CrossRefPubMed Lee SG (2015) A complete treatment of adult living donor liver transplantation: a review of surgical technique and current challenges to expand indication of patients. Am J Transplant 15(1):17–38CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tani K, Shindoh J, Akamatsu N, Arita J, Kaneko J, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N (2016) Venous drainage map of the liver for complex hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation. HPB 18(12):1031–1038CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tani K, Shindoh J, Akamatsu N, Arita J, Kaneko J, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N (2016) Venous drainage map of the liver for complex hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation. HPB 18(12):1031–1038CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Fan ST (2007) Precise hepatectomy guided by the middle hepatic vein. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 6(4):430–434PubMed Fan ST (2007) Precise hepatectomy guided by the middle hepatic vein. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 6(4):430–434PubMed
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688CrossRefPubMed Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Vauthey JN, Rees M (2011) Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 13(8):528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Vauthey JN, Rees M (2011) Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 13(8):528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Natsume S, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, Shimoyama Y, Nagino M (2012) Clinical significance of left trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an appraisal and comparison with left hepatectomy. Ann Surg 255(4):754–762CrossRefPubMed Natsume S, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Sugawara G, Shimoyama Y, Nagino M (2012) Clinical significance of left trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an appraisal and comparison with left hepatectomy. Ann Surg 255(4):754–762CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sano K, Makuuchi M, Miki K, Maema A, Sugawara Y, Imamura H, Matsunami H, Takayama T (2002) Evaluation of hepatic venous congestion: proposed indication criteria for hepatic vein reconstruction. Ann Surg 236(2):241–247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sano K, Makuuchi M, Miki K, Maema A, Sugawara Y, Imamura H, Matsunami H, Takayama T (2002) Evaluation of hepatic venous congestion: proposed indication criteria for hepatic vein reconstruction. Ann Surg 236(2):241–247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kaneko T, Kaneko K, Sugimoto H, Inoue S, Hatsuno T, Sawada K, Ando H, Nakao A (2000) Intrahepatic anastomosis formation between the hepatic veins in the graft liver of the living related liver transplantation: observation by Doppler ultrasonography. Transplantation 70(6):982–985CrossRefPubMed Kaneko T, Kaneko K, Sugimoto H, Inoue S, Hatsuno T, Sawada K, Ando H, Nakao A (2000) Intrahepatic anastomosis formation between the hepatic veins in the graft liver of the living related liver transplantation: observation by Doppler ultrasonography. Transplantation 70(6):982–985CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Scatton O, Plasse M, Dondero F, Vilgrain V, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (2008) Impact of localized congestion related to venous deprivation after hepatectomy. Surgery 143(4):483–489CrossRefPubMed Scatton O, Plasse M, Dondero F, Vilgrain V, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (2008) Impact of localized congestion related to venous deprivation after hepatectomy. Surgery 143(4):483–489CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, Schroeder T, Frühauf NR, Malagó M, Bourquain H, Peitgen HO, Oldhafer KJ, Broelsch CE (2005) Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 140(7):629–638CrossRefPubMed Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, Schroeder T, Frühauf NR, Malagó M, Bourquain H, Peitgen HO, Oldhafer KJ, Broelsch CE (2005) Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 140(7):629–638CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bismuth H (2013) Revisiting liver anatomy and terminology of hepatectomies. Ann Surg 257(3):383–386CrossRefPubMed Bismuth H (2013) Revisiting liver anatomy and terminology of hepatectomies. Ann Surg 257(3):383–386CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Phillips C (2013) Use and dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy and resections. Ann Surg 257(3):377–382CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Phillips C (2013) Use and dissemination of the Brisbane 2000 nomenclature of liver anatomy and resections. Ann Surg 257(3):377–382CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356:1545–1559CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356:1545–1559CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ogata S, Inoue K, Maruyama Y, Miyazaki A, Makuuchi M (2013) Planning of anatomical liver segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy with 3-dimensional simulation software. Am J Surg 206(4):530–538CrossRefPubMed Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ogata S, Inoue K, Maruyama Y, Miyazaki A, Makuuchi M (2013) Planning of anatomical liver segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy with 3-dimensional simulation software. Am J Surg 206(4):530–538CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Shindoh J, Mise Y, Satou S, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N (2010) The intersegmental plane of the liver is not always flat—tricks for anatomical liver resection. Ann Surg 251(5):917–922CrossRefPubMed Shindoh J, Mise Y, Satou S, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N (2010) The intersegmental plane of the liver is not always flat—tricks for anatomical liver resection. Ann Surg 251(5):917–922CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tang, R., Ma, L.F., Rong, Z.X., Li, M.D., Zeng, J.P., Wang, X.D., Liao, H.E. and Dong, J.H., 2018. Augmented reality technology for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during hepatobiliary surgery: a review of current methods. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, p.1 Tang, R., Ma, L.F., Rong, Z.X., Li, M.D., Zeng, J.P., Wang, X.D., Liao, H.E. and Dong, J.H., 2018. Augmented reality technology for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during hepatobiliary surgery: a review of current methods. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, p.1
25.
go back to reference Lim C, Vibert E, Azoulay D, Salloum C, Ishizawa T, Yoshioka R, Mise Y, Sakamoto Y, Aoki T, Sugawara Y, Hasegawa K (2014) Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in the surgical management of liver cancers: current facts and future implications. J Visceral Surger 151(2):117–124CrossRef Lim C, Vibert E, Azoulay D, Salloum C, Ishizawa T, Yoshioka R, Mise Y, Sakamoto Y, Aoki T, Sugawara Y, Hasegawa K (2014) Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in the surgical management of liver cancers: current facts and future implications. J Visceral Surger 151(2):117–124CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Uchiyama K, Ueno M, Ozawa S, Kiriyama S, Shigekawa Y, Hirono S, Kawai M, Tani M, Yamaue H (2011) Combined intraoperative use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography imaging using a sonazoid and fluorescence navigation system with indocyanine green during anatomical hepatectomy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 396(7):1101–1107CrossRef Uchiyama K, Ueno M, Ozawa S, Kiriyama S, Shigekawa Y, Hirono S, Kawai M, Tani M, Yamaue H (2011) Combined intraoperative use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography imaging using a sonazoid and fluorescence navigation system with indocyanine green during anatomical hepatectomy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 396(7):1101–1107CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Segment 5 parenchymal sparing in extended left hepatectomy with respect to venous outflow—is it a feasible procedure?
Authors
Jun Li
Moustafa Mohamed
Lutz Fischer
Björn Nashan
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1673-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2018 Go to the issue